OBJECTIVE: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) management for HIV-infected children is critical in many resource-constrained countries. We investigated the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of different frequencies of monitoring plasma viral load among HIV-positive children initiating ART in a resource-limited setting. DESIGN/ METHODS: A stochastic agent-based simulation model was built and directly informed by a cohort of 304 HIV-infected children starting ART in Thailand between 2001 and 2009. The model simulated the expected costs and clinical outcomes over time according to different viral load monitoring frequencies and initiation of second-line therapies when appropriate. RESULTS: The optimal frequency of viral load monitoring was found to be annual, after a single screening at 6 months. Associated costs of viral load monitoring and appropriate ART would approximately triple current treatment costs. Compared with current conditions, a single screening during the first year of ART led to a 58.4% reduction in the total person-years of virological failure with annual monitoring leading to a 76.6% reduction. The incremental cost per quality adjusted life year gained from the optimal monitoring frequency was estimated as US$ 68,084 when including costs of ART and US$ 7224 without ART costs. The estimated cost attributed to preventing 1 year of virological failure was US$ 3393 with ART costs and US$ 359 without ART costs. CONCLUSION: Even infrequent viral load monitoring is likely to provide substantial clinical benefit to HIV-infected children on ART. Viral load monitoring can be considered cost-effective in many resource-limited settings. However, the costs associated with second-line therapies could be a barrier to its economic feasibility.
OBJECTIVE: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) management for HIV-infectedchildren is critical in many resource-constrained countries. We investigated the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of different frequencies of monitoring plasma viral load among HIV-positive children initiating ART in a resource-limited setting. DESIGN/ METHODS: A stochastic agent-based simulation model was built and directly informed by a cohort of 304 HIV-infectedchildren starting ART in Thailand between 2001 and 2009. The model simulated the expected costs and clinical outcomes over time according to different viral load monitoring frequencies and initiation of second-line therapies when appropriate. RESULTS: The optimal frequency of viral load monitoring was found to be annual, after a single screening at 6 months. Associated costs of viral load monitoring and appropriate ART would approximately triple current treatment costs. Compared with current conditions, a single screening during the first year of ART led to a 58.4% reduction in the total person-years of virological failure with annual monitoring leading to a 76.6% reduction. The incremental cost per quality adjusted life year gained from the optimal monitoring frequency was estimated as US$ 68,084 when including costs of ART and US$ 7224 without ART costs. The estimated cost attributed to preventing 1 year of virological failure was US$ 3393 with ART costs and US$ 359 without ART costs. CONCLUSION: Even infrequent viral load monitoring is likely to provide substantial clinical benefit to HIV-infectedchildren on ART. Viral load monitoring can be considered cost-effective in many resource-limited settings. However, the costs associated with second-line therapies could be a barrier to its economic feasibility.
Authors: Luisa Salazar-Vizcaya; Olivia Keiser; Mary-Ann Davies; Andreas D Haas; Nello Blaser; Vivian Cox; Brian Eley; Helena Rabie; Harry Moultrie; Janet Giddy; Robin Wood; Matthias Egger; Janne Estill Journal: AIDS Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Benjamin P Westley; Allison K DeLong; Chhraing S Tray; Dim Sophearin; Elizabeth M Dufort; Eric Nerrienet; Leeann Schreier; Joseph I Harwell; Rami Kantor Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Victor Ssempijja; Martha Nason; Gertrude Nakigozi; Anthony Ndyanabo; Ron Gray; Maria Wawer; Larry W Chang; Erin Gabriel; Thomas C Quinn; David Serwadda; Steven J Reynolds Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2020-08-14 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Mary-Ann Davies; Andrew Boulle; Karl Technau; Brian Eley; Harry Moultrie; Helena Rabie; Daniela Garone; Janet Giddy; Robin Wood; Matthias Egger; Olivia Keiser Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2012-09-14 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Paul K Drain; Jienchi Dorward; Andrew Bender; Lorraine Lillis; Francesco Marinucci; Jilian Sacks; Anna Bershteyn; David S Boyle; Jonathan D Posner; Nigel Garrett Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2019-05-15 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: Steven J Reynolds; Hakim Sendagire; Kevin Newell; Barbara Castelnuovo; Immaculate Nankya; Moses Kamya; Thomas C Quinn; Yukari C Manabe; Andrew Kambugu Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2012-12-27 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Andrew P Craig; Hla-Hla Thein; Lei Zhang; Richard T Gray; Klara Henderson; David Wilson; Marelize Gorgens; David P Wilson Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 5.396