Literature DB >> 21505205

Association between diagnosed diabetes and self-reported cancer among U.S. adults: findings from the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Chaoyang Li1, Lina S Balluz, Earl S Ford, Catherine A Okoro, James Tsai, Guixiang Zhao.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between diagnosed diabetes and self-reported cancer among U.S. adults. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed data for 397,783 adults who participated in the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and had valid data on diabetes and cancer.
RESULTS: After adjustment for potential confounders, diabetic men had higher adjusted prevalence ratios for cancers of the prostate (1.1 [95% CI 1.0-1.3]), colon (1.3 [1.0-1.7]), pancreas (4.6 [1.8-11.7]), rectum (2.2 [1.0-4.7]), urinary bladder (1.7 [1.2-2.2]), and kidney (1.9 [1.2-3.0]) than nondiabetic men (all P < 0.05). Diabetic women had higher adjusted prevalence ratios for cancers of the breast (1.1 [1.0-1.3]) and endometrium (1.6 [1.2-2.0]), and leukemia (2.3 [1.3-4.2]) than nondiabetic women (all P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that diabetic adults have higher prevalences of certain cancers than nondiabetic adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21505205      PMCID: PMC3114364          DOI: 10.2337/dc11-0020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


Diabetes and cancer are two common chronic diseases that exert serious adverse effects on public health in the U.S. Approximately 25.6 million adults (11.3%) aged 20 years or older were estimated to have diabetes in 2010 (1). Approximately 11.7 million Americans were living with cancer in 2007. Studies have found that diabetes is associated with an increased risk for certain types of cancer (2,3), and diabetes may increase the risk of all-cause mortality among people with cancer (4). To compare the prevalence of cancer between adults without and with diabetes, we analyzed a large population–based sample from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) in the U.S.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The BRFSS is a standardized telephone survey that annually assesses key behavioral risk factors and chronic diseases among adults aged 18 years or older in all U.S. states, District of Columbia, and territories. The median cooperation rate among states was 75.0% in 2009 (5). BRFSS data have consistently provided valid and reliable estimates compared with national household surveys (6,7). Diabetes status was ascertained by asking participants, “Have you ever been told by a doctor that you have diabetes?” Responses were coded as “yes,” “yes, but female told only during pregnancy,” or “no.” Gestational diabetes was coded as “no” diabetes. Cancer status was ascertained by asking participants, “Have you ever been told by a doctor, nurse, or other health professional that you have cancer?” Responses were coded as “yes,” or “no.” For those who answered “yes” to this question, the following questions were asked, “With your most recent diagnoses of cancer, what type of cancer was it?” The survey included 10 major cancer sites/tracts and 29 cancer types: breast cancer, male reproductive tract (prostate cancer, testicular cancer), head/neck (head and neck cancer, oral cancer, pharyngeal cancer, thyroid cancer), gastrointestinal tract (colon cancer, esophageal cancer, liver cancer, pancreatic cancer, rectal cancer, stomach cancer), leukemia/lymphoma (Hodgkin’s lymphoma, leukemia, non–Hodgkin’s lymphoma), skin (melanoma, other skin cancer), lung cancer, urinary tract (urinary bladder cancer, kidney cancer), and other sites (heart cancer, bone cancer, brain cancer, neuroblastoma, other). Demographic characteristics included sex, age (year), and race/ethnicity (non–Hispanic white, non–Hispanic black, Hispanic, and other). Health-related risk factors included health insurance coverage (none vs. any type of health insurance), smoking status (current smoker, former smoker, and never smoked), heavy drinking (consuming more than two drinks per day among men and more than one drink per day among women), BMI (kg/m2), and physical inactivity. We estimated the crude prevalence for cancer of all sites and specific types of cancer according to diabetes status. We estimated the prevalence ratios and their 95% CIs using log-linear models with a robust error variance estimator (8). The equality in the prevalence estimates was tested with a two-sample t test. We considered results with a two-tailed P value <0.05 or the 95% CI of a prevalence ratio estimate that did not include 1 to be statistically significant. We conducted all analyses using SUDAAN 9.0 software (Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC) to account for the complex sampling design.

RESULTS

The final analytic sample of 397,783 individuals (mean age, 46.8 years; range, 18–99 years or older; SE = 0.06 years) consisted of 151,459 men (38.1%), 318,070 non–Hispanic whites (80.0%), 31,168 non–Hispanic blacks (7.8%), 26,764 Hispanics (6.7%), and 21,781 other racial/ethnic participants (5.5%). After adjustment for age and all other potential confounders, men with diabetes had significantly higher prevalences of cancer of all sites and cancers of the prostate, colon, pancreas, rectum, urinary bladder, and kidney than men without diabetes (Table 1). Women with diabetes had significantly higher prevalences of cancer of all sites and cancers of the breast and endometrium as well as leukemia than women without diabetes (all P < 0.05). Diabetic men had a higher prevalence of liver cancer, whereas diabetic women had a higher prevalence of liver cancer and pancreatic cancer than their nondiabetic counterparts, albeit no statistical significance was detected (P = 0.07–0.13).
Table 1

Prevalences and prevalence ratios of cancer according to diabetes status among men and women, BRFSS 2009

Cancer site/tractCancer typeCrude prevalence, % (SE)
Prevalence ratio (95% CI)
DiabetesNo diabetesPModel 1*Model 2Model 3
Men, N19,719131,740
All cancers15.89 (0.45)7.49 (0.11)<0.00012.1 (2.0–2.3)1.1 (1.0–1.1)1.1 (1.1–1.2)
 Breast cancer0.10 (0.04)0.02 (0.01)0.0295.2 (2.1–12.7)3.0 (1.2–7.1)1.5 (0.4–4.8)
 Male reproductive5.35 (0.31)2.06 (0.06)<0.00012.6 (2.3–3.0)1.1 (1.0–1.3)1.1 (1.0–1.3)
Prostate5.11 (0.31)1.89 (0.05)<0.00012.7 (2.4–3.1)1.2 (1.0–1.3)1.1 (1.0–1.3)
Testicular0.27 (0.06)0.18 (0.03)0.201.5 (0.9–2.5)1.2 (0.7–2.1)1.1 (0.5–2.2)
 Head/neck0.58 (0.09)0.27 (0.02)0.00062.2 (1.6–3.1)1.2 (0.8–1.6)1.2 (0.8–1.7)
Head and neck0.11 (0.04)0.06 (0.01)0.181.9 (0.9–3.8)1.0 (0.5–2.0)1.2 (0.6–2.5)
Oral0.07 (0.03)0.05 (0.01)0.431.5 (0.6–3.4)0.9 (0.4–1.8)0.9 (0.4–2.1)
Pharyngeal0.14 (0.04)0.06 (0.01)0.0662.2 (1.2–4.2)1.0 (0.5–1.9)1.0 (0.5–1.9)
Thyroid0.26 (0.07)0.10 (0.01)0.0142.7 (1.5–4.8)1.6 (0.9–2.8)1.4 (0.8–2.6)
 Gastrointestinal1.90 (0.17)0.58 (0.03)<0.00013.2 (2.7–4.0)1.5 (1.2–1.8)1.4 (1.2–1.8)
Colon1.37 (0.15)0.42 (0.02)<0.00013.2 (2.5–4.1)1.5 (1.1–1.8)1.3 (1.0–1.7)
Esophageal0.03 (0.01)0.03 (0.01)0.951.0 (0.5–2.1)0.4 (0.2–0.9)0.6 (0.3–1.4)
Liver0.12 (0.04)0.03 (0.01)0.0223.7 (1.8–7.6)1.9 (0.9–4.0)1.8 (0.9–3.4)
Pancreatic0.16 (0.07)0.02 (0.01)0.0347.0 (2.8–17.3)3.4 (1.4–8.3)4.6 (1.8–11.7)
Rectal0.14 (0.04)0.03 (0.01)0.0034.7 (2.6–8.8)2.1 (1.1–4.0)2.2 (1.0–4.7)
Stomach0.09 (0.03)0.04 (0.01)0.122.2 (1.0–4.5)1.1 (0.5–2.2)1.0 (0.4–2.5)
 Leukemia/lymphoma0.68 (0.10)0.44 (0.04)0.0261.6 (1.1–2.2)1.0 (0.7–1.4)1.1 (0.8–1.6)
Hodgkin’s lymphoma0.32 (0.08)0.14 (0.02)0.0232.4 (1.4–4.1)1.7 (0.9–3.0)1.8 (0.9–3.4)
Leukemia0.15 (0.04)0.13 (0.02)0.611.2 (0.7–2.1)0.7 (0.4–1.2)0.8 (0.5–1.6)
Non–Hodgkin’s lymphoma0.21 (0.05)0.17 (0.03)0.531.2 (0.7–2.2)0.8 (0.5–1.4)0.8 (0.4–1.4)
 Skin5.57 (0.27)3.09 (0.06)<0.00011.8 (1.6–2.0)0.9 (0.8–1.0)1.0 (0.9–1.1)
Melanoma2.01 (0.15)0.99 (0.04)<0.00012.0 (1.7–2.4)1.0 (0.8–1.2)1.1 (0.9–1.3)
Other skin3.71 (0.23)2.14 (0.05)<0.00011.7 (1.5–2.0)0.9 (0.8–1.0)1.0 (0.9–1.1)
 Lung0.38 (0.06)0.19 (0.02)0.00362.0 (1.3–2.9)0.9 (0.6–1.3)0.8 (0.5–1.4)
 Urinary1.35 (0.14)0.33 (0.02)<0.00014.1 (3.2–5.1)1.8 (1.4–2.3)1.7 (1.3–2.2)
Bladder0.86 (0.11)0.22 (0.02)<0.00014.0 (3.0–5.3)1.7 (1.3–2.3)1.7 (1.2–2.2)
Kidney0.50 (0.09)0.12 (0.01)<0.00014.3 (2.9–6.4)2.2 (1.4–3.3)1.9 (1.2–3.0)
 Other sites1.53 (0.15)0.70 (0.04)<0.00012.2 (1.8–2.7)1.2 (1.0–1.5)1.2 (1.0–1.6)
HeartRare§Rare
Bone0.11 (0.04)0.06 (0.02)0.281.9 (0.7–4.9)1.6 (0.7–3.9)1.5 (0.6–3.7)
Brain0.07 (0.03)0.04 (0.01)0.331.7 (0.7–3.9)1.6 (0.7–4.0)2.2 (0.9–5.6)
NeuroblastomaRareRare
Other1.36 (0.14)0.60 (0.03)<0.00012.3 (1.8–2.8)1.2 (0.9–1.5)1.2 (1.0–1.5)
Women, N28,699217,625
All cancers17.08 (0.39)10.37 (0.11)<0.00011.7 (1.6–1.7)1.1 (1.0–1.1)1.1 (1.1–1.2)
 Breast5.52 (0.24)2.87 (0.06)<0.00011.9 (1.8–2.1)1.1 (1.0–1.2)1.1 (1.0–1.3)
 Reproductive4.08 (0.25)2.22 (0.06)<0.00011.8 (1.6–2.1)1.5 (1.3–1.7)1.3 (1.2–1.6)
Cervical1.87 (0.15)1.36 (0.05)0.00111.4 (1.2–1.6)1.3 (1.1–1.6)1.2 (1.0–1.5)
Endometrial1.45 (0.17)0.45 (0.02)<0.00013.2 (2.5–4.1)2.0 (1.6–2.6)1.6 (1.2–2.0)
Ovarian0.87 (0.13)0.44 (0.03)0.00112.0 (1.4–2.7)1.5 (1.1–2.1)1.4 (0.9–2.0)
 Head/neck0.67 (0.08)0.42 (0.02)0.00231.6 (1.2–2.1)1.1 (0.8–1.4)1.1 (0.8–1.5)
Head and neck0.07 (0.02)0.05 (0.01)0.381.4 (0.7–2.9)0.8 (0.4–1.7)1.1 (0.5–2.2)
Oral0.07 (0.03)0.03 (0.01)0.212.0 (0.8–4.7)1.1 (0.4–2.6)1.0 (0.3–3.0)
Pharyngeal0.06 (0.02)0.03 (0.005)0.182.2 (0.9–5.0)1.3 (0.5–3.1)1.3 (0.6–3.0)
Thyroid0.48 (0.07)0.31 (0.02)0.0191.5 (1.1–2.1)1.1 (0.8–1.5)1.1 (0.8–1.6)
 Gastrointestinal1.42 (0.12)0.59 (0.03)<0.00012.4 (2.0–2.9)1.3 (1.1–1.5)1.2 (0.9–1.5)
Colon1.12 (0.10)0.47 (0.02)<0.00012.4 (2.0–2.9)1.3 (1.0–1.6)1.1 (0.9–1.4)
EsophagealRare0.02 (0.003)
Liver0.10 (0.04)0.02 (0.01)0.0714.7 (1.7–12.7)3.2 (1.1–9.3)2.9 (0.9–9.6)
Pancreatic0.08 (0.03)0.02 (0.005)0.0323.6 (1.6–7.8)2.0 (0.9–4.4)2.5 (0.9–6.8)
Rectal0.08 (0.03)0.04 (0.01)0.112.2 (1.1–4.7)1.2 (0.6–2.4)1.2 (0.5–2.8)
Stomach0.04 (0.01)0.03 (0.01)0.401.4 (0.7–3.0)0.8 (0.4–1.7)0.9 (0.4–2.0)
 Leukemia/lymphoma0.63 (0.09)0.36 (0.02)0.00191.8 (1.3–2.4)1.1 (0.9–1.5)1.2 (0.8–1.6)
Hodgkin’s lymphoma0.17 (0.05)0.12 (0.01)0.341.4 (0.8–2.5)1.0 (0.5–1.8)1.0 (0.5–1.8)
Leukemia0.30 (0.06)0.10 (0.01)0.00153.1 (1.9–4.9)2.0 (1.3–3.4)2.3 (1.3–4.2)
Non–Hodgkin’s lymphoma0.16 (0.03)0.14 (0.01)0.511.2 (0.8–1.8)0.7 (0.5–1.1)0.7 (0.4–1.1)
 Skin4.35 (0.20)3.25 (0.06)<0.00011.3 (1.2–1.5)0.8 (0.7–0.9)1.0 (0.9–1.2)
Melanoma1.35 (0.12)0.90 (0.03)0.00041.5 (1.2–1.8)0.9 (0.8–1.1)1.2 (1.0–1.5)
Other skin3.08 (0.16)2.39 (0.05)0.00011.3 (1.2–1.4)0.7 (0.7–0.8)1.0 (0.9–1.1)
 Lung0.37 (0.05)0.24 (0.02)0.03141.5 (1.1–2.2)0.8 (0.6–1.2)0.7 (0.4–1.1)
 Urinary0.43 (0.06)0.19 (0.01)0.00022.3 (1.7–3.2)1.2 (0.9–1.7)1.2 (0.8–1.6)
Bladder0.19 (0.04)0.10 (0.01)0.0092.0 (1.3–3.0)1.0 (0.7–1.5)0.9 (0.6–1.3)
Kidney0.24 (0.05)0.09 (0.01)0.00712.6 (1.6–4.4)1.6 (1.0–2.6)1.6 (0.9–2.7)
 Other sites1.60 (0.15)0.84 (0.04)<0.00011.9 (1.6–2.3)1.3 (1.0–1.5)1.2 (0.9–1.4)
HeartRareRare
Bone0.05 (0.02)0.05 (0.01)0.941.0 (0.5–2.1)0.9 (0.4–1.7)0.9 (0.4–2.0)
Brain0.04 (0.02)0.06 (0.01)0.540.7 (0.3–2.1)0.8 (0.3–2.1)0.7 (0.2–2.8)
NeuroblastomaRareRare
Other1.50 (0.14)0.73 (0.03)<0.00012.1 (1.7–2.5)1.3 (1.1–1.6)1.2 (1.0–1.5)

*Model 1: unadjusted.

†Model 2: adjusted for age (years, continuous) only.

‡Model 3: adjusted for age (years, continuous), race/ethnicity (non–Hispanic white, non–Hispanic black, Hispanic, other), health insurance coverage (any vs. none), smoking status (current smoker, former smoker, never smoked), heavy drinking (yes, consuming more than two drinks per day among men and more than one drink per day among women vs. no), BMI (kg/m2, continuous), and physical inactivity (yes vs. no).

§Rare: prevalence estimate is between 0 and 0.01%. Statistical tests are not provided due to insufficient data.

Prevalences and prevalence ratios of cancer according to diabetes status among men and women, BRFSS 2009 *Model 1: unadjusted. †Model 2: adjusted for age (years, continuous) only. ‡Model 3: adjusted for age (years, continuous), race/ethnicity (non–Hispanic white, non–Hispanic black, Hispanic, other), health insurance coverage (any vs. none), smoking status (current smoker, former smoker, never smoked), heavy drinking (yes, consuming more than two drinks per day among men and more than one drink per day among women vs. no), BMI (kg/m2, continuous), and physical inactivity (yes vs. no). §Rare: prevalence estimate is between 0 and 0.01%. Statistical tests are not provided due to insufficient data.

CONCLUSIONS

Our prevalence ratio estimates for the cancer of all sites among men and women were comparable to relative risk estimates in studies on cancer incidence (3,9). Our results support an association between diabetes and cancer. Previous findings have shown that diabetes is linked to an increased risk of cancers of the pancreas, liver, kidney, colorectal, urinary bladder, endometrium, breast, and non–Hodgkin’s lymphoma (3). The possible biologic mechanisms that link diabetes and cancer include hyperinsulinemia, hyperglycemia, and/or chronic inflammation (2). These findings have significant public health implications because the strong associations of diabetes with certain cancer types may inform public health decisions and policies regarding the priorities of cancer screening and clinical management. Regular screening is an important tool to detect certain types of cancer early in their onset, particularly those with high prevalence among adults with diabetes. As shown in a previous study (10), U.S. women with diagnosed diabetes had low rates of screening for cancers of the breast, cervix, colon and rectum compared with recommended levels. Moreover, diabetic women were less likely to be screened for cervical cancer compared with nondiabetic women. Therefore, enhanced efforts may be needed to promote cancer screening, particularly for the cancers highly related to diabetes, as evidenced in our study. Our results were subject to several limitations. First, although there is a substantial agreement in determinations of diabetes status by self-reports and those based on actual diagnoses (11), misclassification bias of the diabetes status of participants with undiagnosed diabetes could have resulted in the underestimation of our results. Second, the BRFSS survey excludes adults who have been institutionalized or hospitalized and those with only mobile telephones, which may have led us to underestimate the true prevalence of cancer. In conclusion, our results suggest that adults with diabetes had a higher prevalence of cancer than those without diabetes. These findings highlight a need for increased attention to and efforts in preventing and screening for certain cancers to reduce the disease burden and improve the quality of life among adults with diabetes in the general population.
  9 in total

1.  Public health surveillance for behavioral risk factors in a changing environment. Recommendations from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Team.

Authors:  Ali H Mokdad; Donna F Stroup; Wayne H Giles
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2003-05-23

2.  A comparison of national estimates from the National Health Interview Survey and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Authors:  David E Nelson; Eve Powell-Griner; Machell Town; Mary Grace Kovar
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Diabetes and cancer: a consensus report.

Authors:  Edward Giovannucci; David M Harlan; Michael C Archer; Richard M Bergenstal; Susan M Gapstur; Laurel A Habel; Michael Pollak; Judith G Regensteiner; Douglas Yee
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 4.  Diabetes mellitus, hyperglycaemia and cancer.

Authors:  D Simon; B Balkau
Journal:  Diabetes Metab       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.041

Review 5.  Diabetes and cancer.

Authors:  Paolo Vigneri; Francesco Frasca; Laura Sciacca; Giuseppe Pandini; Riccardo Vigneri
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 5.678

6.  Prevalence and trends of receipt of cancer screenings among US women with diagnosed diabetes.

Authors:  Guixiang Zhao; Earl S Ford; Indu B Ahluwalia; Chaoyang Li; Ali H Mokdad
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Long-term all-cause mortality in cancer patients with preexisting diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bethany B Barone; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Claire F Snyder; Kimberly S Peairs; Kelly B Stein; Rachel L Derr; Antonio C Wolff; Frederick L Brancati
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Validity of cardiovascular disease risk factors assessed by telephone survey: the Behavioral Risk Factor Survey.

Authors:  S J Bowlin; B D Morrill; A N Nafziger; P L Jenkins; C Lewis; T A Pearson
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio.

Authors:  Aluísio J D Barros; Vânia N Hirakata
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2003-10-20       Impact factor: 4.615

  9 in total
  19 in total

1.  Association between longer therapy with thiazolidinediones and risk of bladder cancer: a cohort study.

Authors:  Ronac Mamtani; Kevin Haynes; Warren B Bilker; David J Vaughn; Brian L Strom; Karen Glanz; James D Lewis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Metformin and cancer.

Authors:  Natalia G Vallianou; Angelos Evangelopoulos; Christos Kazazis
Journal:  Rev Diabet Stud       Date:  2014-02-10

3.  Association of insulin resistance with breast, ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancers in non-diabetic women.

Authors:  Wanwan Sun; Jieli Lu; Shengli Wu; Yufang Bi; Yiming Mu; Jiajun Zhao; Chao Liu; Lulu Chen; Lixin Shi; Qiang Li; Tao Yang; Li Yan; Qin Wan; Yan Liu; Guixia Wang; Zuojie Luo; Xulei Tang; Gang Chen; Yanan Huo; Zhengnan Gao; Qing Su; Zhen Ye; Youmin Wang; Guijun Qin; Huacong Deng; Xuefeng Yu; Feixia Shen; Li Chen; Liebin Zhao; Tiange Wang; Jichao Sun; Min Xu; Yu Xu; Yuhong Chen; Meng Dai; Jie Zhang; Di Zhang; Shenghan Lai; Donghui Li; Guang Ning; Weiqing Wang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 6.166

4.  Is diabetes a risk factor for central venous access port-related bloodstream infection in oncological patients?

Authors:  A Touré; P Vanhems; C Lombard-Bohas; J-C Souquet; M Lauverjat; C Chambrier
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 5.  Diabetes mellitus and the incidence of colorectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Longying Deng; Zhifu Gui; Lianying Zhao; Jianping Wang; Lizong Shen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  Is diabetes mellitus a risk factor for pancreatic cancer?

Authors:  Raffaele Pezzilli; Nico Pagano
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Sugar-sweetened beverage intake and the risk of type I and type II endometrial cancer among postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Maki Inoue-Choi; Kim Robien; Andrea Mariani; James R Cerhan; Kristin E Anderson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Diabetes and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  P Boyle; M Boniol; A Koechlin; C Robertson; F Valentini; K Coppens; L-L Fairley; M Boniol; T Zheng; Y Zhang; M Pasterk; M Smans; M P Curado; P Mullie; S Gandini; M Bota; G B Bolli; J Rosenstock; P Autier
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Diabetes mellitus and risk of bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  Zhaowei Zhu; Xiaohua Zhang; Zhoujun Shen; Shan Zhong; Xianjin Wang; Yingli Lu; Chen Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Prevalence of diagnosed cancer according to duration of diagnosed diabetes and current insulin use among U.S. adults with diagnosed diabetes: findings from the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Authors:  Chaoyang Li; Guixiang Zhao; Catherine A Okoro; Xiao-Jun Wen; Earl S Ford; Lina S Balluz
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.