Literature DB >> 21504480

Immediately restored one-piece single-tooth implants with reduced diameter: one-year results of a multi-center study.

A Zembić1, L H Johannesen, S Schou, P Malo, T Reichert, M Farella, C H F Hämmerle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present multi-center study was to evaluate the treatment outcome of immediately restored one-piece single-tooth implants with a diameter of 3 mm after 1 year.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 57 one-piece implants (NobelDirect 3.0) were inserted in 47 patients (26 females, 21 males) with a mean age of 31 years (range: 17-76 years) at five different centers. The implants replaced maxillary lateral incisors and mandibular incisors. The implants were placed either in conjunction with tooth extraction or in healed sites, and all implants were immediately restored with a provisional resin crown. If needed, the abutment part of the implant was prepared before crown cementation. The permanent crown was placed after 1.9-14.5 months. Radiographs were taken at implant insertion as well as after 6 and 12 months to evaluate the peri-implant marginal bone level and bone loss. Moreover, plaque, bleeding on probing and complications were assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 44 patients (23 females, 21 males) with 54 implants were available for the 1-year follow-up. One implant was lost, thus the 1-year implant survival was 98%. A statistically significant mean marginal bone loss was observed between baseline and 6 months (1.1 mm, range: -0.7 to 4.4 mm; n=49) and between baseline and 12 months (1.6 mm, range: -0.8 to 4.6 mm; n=50). A total of 18% of the implants were characterized by a bone loss of more than 3 mm. No bleeding on probing was observed around 83% of the implants. Plaque was registered at 15% of the implants. The most common complications were related to the provisional crown, i.e. fracture (n=3) and loss of retention (n=3).
CONCLUSIONS: A high 1-year implant survival was observed in the present study. However, the excessive peri-implant marginal bone loss around several implants indicates that this implant should be used with caution until further studies have been conducted.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21504480     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02174.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  2 in total

1.  Immediate loading of one-piece implants in conjunction with a modified technique of inferior alveolar nerve lateralization: 10 years follow-up.

Authors:  Riham Eldibany; Joaquin G Rodriguez
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-01-13

Review 2.  Narrow-diameter implants: are they a predictable treatment option? A literature review.

Authors:  José-Luis Sierra-Sánchez; Amparo Martínez-González; Fernando García-Sala Bonmatí; José-Félix Mañes-Ferrer; Alejandro Brotons-Oliver
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2014-01-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.