Literature DB >> 21503940

Efficacy and safety of entecavir versus adefovir in chronic hepatitis B patients with hepatic decompensation: a randomized, open-label study.

Yun-Fan Liaw1, Maria Raptopoulou-Gigi, Hugo Cheinquer, Shiv Kumar Sarin, Tawesak Tanwandee, Nancy Leung, Cheng-Yuan Peng, Robert P Myers, Robert S Brown, Lennox Jeffers, Naoky Tsai, Jolanta Bialkowska, Shijie Tang, Suzanne Beebe, Elizabeth Cooney.   

Abstract

A randomized, open-label comparative study of entecavir versus adefovir therapy was performed in subjects with chronic hepatitis B who had hepatic decompensation (Child-Turcotte-Pugh score ≥7). Adult subjects were randomized and treated (n = 191) with entecavir 1.0 mg or adefovir 10 mg daily for up to 96 weeks from the date of last subject randomization. Subjects were positive or negative for hepatitis B e antigen and experienced or naive for treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean reduction in serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, as determined by polymerase chain reaction, at week 24, adjusted for baseline HBV DNA and lamivudine resistance status by linear regression analysis. Entecavir demonstrated superiority to adefovir for this endpoint (treatment difference 1.74 log(10) copies/mL [95% confidence interval -2.30, -1.18]; P < 0.0001). The entecavir group showed a greater change from baseline in HBV DNA at all time points through week 48 and a higher proportion of subjects who achieved HBV DNA < 300 copies/mL at weeks 24 (entecavir 49%; adefovir 16%; P < 0.0001) and 48 (entecavir 57%; adefovir 20%; P < 0.0001). Approximately two-thirds of subjects in both groups showed improvement/stabilization in Child-Turcotte-Pugh status. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score change at week 48 was -2.6 for entecavir and -1.7 for adefovir. Adverse event rates were comparable between groups. Cumulative hepatocellular carcinoma rates were 12% for entecavir and 20% for adefovir. Cumulative death rates were 23% for entecavir and 33% for adefovir. Week 24 mortality rates were 12% for both groups. conclusion: Entecavir demonstrated superior virologic efficacy to adefovir in a population of patients with chronic hepatitis B who had hepatic decompensation. Biochemical and clinical benefits were also demonstrated. Entecavir was well tolerated, and early mortality rates were consistent with rates observed in similar populations treated with lamivudine.
Copyright © 2011 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21503940     DOI: 10.1002/hep.24361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  53 in total

Review 1.  Entecavir: a review of its use in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in patients with decompensated liver disease.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Prevention of post liver transplant HBV recurrence.

Authors:  Geoffrey W McCaughan
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 6.047

3.  Lactic Acidosis during Entecavir Antiviral Treatment in a Patient with Hepatitis B Virus-related Decompensated Cirrhosis.

Authors:  H Mao; T Kang
Journal:  West Indian Med J       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 0.171

Review 4.  Antiviral therapies and prospects for a cure of chronic hepatitis B.

Authors:  Fabien Zoulim; David Durantel
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 6.915

5.  Entecavir safety and effectiveness in a national cohort of treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients in the US - the ENUMERATE study.

Authors:  J Ahn; H M Lee; J K Lim; C Q Pan; M H Nguyen; W Ray Kim; A Mannalithara; H Trinh; D Chu; T Tran; A Min; S Do; H Te; K R Reddy; A S Lok
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 8.171

6.  De novo combined lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil therapy vs entecavir monotherapy for hepatitis B virus-related decompensated cirrhosis.

Authors:  Jiang-Shan Lian; Lin-Yan Zeng; Jian-Yang Chen; Hong-Yu Jia; Yi-Min Zhang; Dai-Rong Xiang; Liang Yu; Jian-Hua Hu; Ying-Feng Lu; Ling Zheng; Lan-Juan Li; Yi-Da Yang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Treatment of chronic hepatitis B in clinical practice with entecavir or tenofovir.

Authors:  Ezequiel Ridruejo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  KASL clinical practice guidelines: management of chronic hepatitis B.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Mol Hepatol       Date:  2016-03-28

Review 9.  Μanagement of patients with hepatitis B and C before and after liver and kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Chrysoula Pipili; Evangelos Cholongitas
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2014-05-27

Review 10.  Does antiviral therapy reduce complications of cirrhosis?

Authors:  Goh Eun Chung; Jeong-Hoon Lee; Yoon Jun Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.