OBJECTIVE: The effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on post-infarct ventricular remodeling remains controversial. We hypothesized that the timing of G-CSF administration after myocardial ischemia plays an important role in determining its efficacy. METHODS: Rat myocardial ischemia was induced by 60 min coronary ligation and reperfusion. Surviving animals received G-CSF after 1 h (E-G) or 24 h (D-G) of reperfusion randomly at 100 μg/kg/d for five consecutive days. 7 days or 3 months post-ischemia, rat hearts were quickly removed for ex vivo electrophysiological measurements or histological analysis (collagen disposition and angiogenesis) and metalloproteinase-2 and -9 activity assays (gelatin zymography). Left ventricular (LV) invasive hemodynamic analysis was performed in 3-month recovery animals before sacrifice. RESULTS: At 3 months post ischemia, LV mechanical remodeling was further impaired with early G-CSF administration (0.65 ± 0.17%, 13.21 ± 7.36 mmHg, -4,684 ± 1,560 mmHg/s) compared with the control group (0.28 ± 0.12%, 6.45 ± 3.43 mmHg, -6,267 ± 1,111 mmHg/s) and D-G group (0.34 ± 0.12%, 7.90 ± 5.33 mmHg, -6,227 ± 1,075 mmHg/s) as shown by increased expansion index (P < 0.01), deterioration of myocardial function with increased LVDP (P < 0.05), and decreased -dP/dt (max) (P < 0.05). By contrast, there was a significant increase in electrical properties including monophasic action potential (MAP) 90 dispersion (12.58 ± 4.46 vs. 30.56 ± 6.17 ms at 7 days; 18.54 ± 4.31 vs. 34.78 ± 5.24 ms at 3 months; P < 0.05 for both) and inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias (4.78 ± 1.19 vs. 11.58 ± 2.76 ms at 3 months; P < 0.05) with early G-CSF treatment compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Both early and delayed administrations of G-CSF can improve electrophysiological properties after myocardial ischemia, but have no beneficial effects on LV mechanical remodeling.
OBJECTIVE: The effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on post-infarct ventricular remodeling remains controversial. We hypothesized that the timing of G-CSF administration after myocardial ischemia plays an important role in determining its efficacy. METHODS:Ratmyocardial ischemia was induced by 60 min coronary ligation and reperfusion. Surviving animals received G-CSF after 1 h (E-G) or 24 h (D-G) of reperfusion randomly at 100 μg/kg/d for five consecutive days. 7 days or 3 months post-ischemia, rat hearts were quickly removed for ex vivo electrophysiological measurements or histological analysis (collagen disposition and angiogenesis) and metalloproteinase-2 and -9 activity assays (gelatin zymography). Left ventricular (LV) invasive hemodynamic analysis was performed in 3-month recovery animals before sacrifice. RESULTS: At 3 months post ischemia, LV mechanical remodeling was further impaired with early G-CSF administration (0.65 ± 0.17%, 13.21 ± 7.36 mmHg, -4,684 ± 1,560 mmHg/s) compared with the control group (0.28 ± 0.12%, 6.45 ± 3.43 mmHg, -6,267 ± 1,111 mmHg/s) and D-G group (0.34 ± 0.12%, 7.90 ± 5.33 mmHg, -6,227 ± 1,075 mmHg/s) as shown by increased expansion index (P < 0.01), deterioration of myocardial function with increased LVDP (P < 0.05), and decreased -dP/dt (max) (P < 0.05). By contrast, there was a significant increase in electrical properties including monophasic action potential (MAP) 90 dispersion (12.58 ± 4.46 vs. 30.56 ± 6.17 ms at 7 days; 18.54 ± 4.31 vs. 34.78 ± 5.24 ms at 3 months; P < 0.05 for both) and inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias (4.78 ± 1.19 vs. 11.58 ± 2.76 ms at 3 months; P < 0.05) with early G-CSF treatment compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Both early and delayed administrations of G-CSF can improve electrophysiological properties after myocardial ischemia, but have no beneficial effects on LV mechanical remodeling.