Literature DB >> 21502825

Accuracy in celiac disease diagnostics by controlling the small-bowel biopsy process.

Charlotta Webb1, Britta Halvarsson, Fredrik Norström, Anna Myléus, Annelie Carlsson, Lars Danielsson, Lotta Högberg, Anneli Ivarsson, Eva Karlsson, Lars Stenhammar, Olof Sandström.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In a Swedish celiac disease screening study (Exploring the Iceberg of Celiacs in Sweden), we systematically reviewed the clinical diagnostic procedures with the aim to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and to take advantage of lessons learned for improving diagnostic routines.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A school-based celiac disease screening study involving 5 Swedish centers, with 10,041 invited 12-year-olds with 7567 consenting participation. All 192 children with elevated serological markers were recommended to undergo small-bowel biopsy, performed and evaluated according to local clinical routines. All of the mucosal specimens were reevaluated by 1 and, when needed, 2 expert pathologists to reach diagnostic consensus.
RESULTS: Small-bowel biopsies were performed in 184 children: 130 by endoscopy and 54 by suction capsule. Endoscopic biopsies were inconclusive in 0.6%, compared with 7.4% of biopsies by suction capsule. A patchy enteropathy was found in 9.1%. Reevaluation by the expert pathologist resulted in 6 additional cases with celiac disease and 1 cleared. Sixteen children with normal or inconclusive biopsies, 4 after endoscopy, and 12 after suction capsule were endoscopically rebiopsied, resulting in another 8 cases. The celiac disease prevalence of 30 of 1000 (95% confidence interval 26-34) was not statistically different from that previously reported.
CONCLUSIONS: The present review revealed the importance of controlling each step of the diagnostic procedure. Several cases would have been missed by relying only on local routines. To improve the quality of childhood celiac disease diagnostics, we recommend multiple endoscopic biopsies from both proximal and distal duodenum and standardized evaluation by a pathologist with good knowledge of celiac disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21502825     DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181fa434f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr        ISSN: 0277-2116            Impact factor:   2.839


  10 in total

1.  Body mass index is not a reliable tool in predicting celiac disease in children.

Authors:  Maria van der Pals; Anna Myléus; Fredrik Norström; Solveig Hammarroth; Lotta Högberg; Anna Rosén; Anneli Ivarsson; Annelie Carlsson
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.125

2.  Gastroscopy in pediatric surgery: indications, complications, outcomes, and ethical aspects.

Authors:  Louise Roth; Martin Salö; Mette Hambraeus; Pernilla Stenström; Einar Arnbjörnsson
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.260

3.  Is mass screening for coeliac disease a wise use of resources? A health economic evaluation.

Authors:  Fredrik Norström; Anna Myléus; Katrina Nordyke; Annelie Carlsson; Lotta Högberg; Olof Sandström; Lars Stenhammar; Anneli Ivarsson; Lars Lindholm
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Prevalence of thyroid autoimmunity in children with celiac disease compared to healthy 12-year olds.

Authors:  Maria van der Pals; Anneli Ivarsson; Fredrik Norström; Lotta Högberg; Johan Svensson; Annelie Carlsson
Journal:  Autoimmune Dis       Date:  2014-01-27

5.  Internalizing the threat of risk--a qualitative study about adolescents' experience living with screening-detected celiac disease 5 years after diagnosis.

Authors:  Katrina Nordyke; Anna Rosén; Maria Emmelin; Anneli Ivarsson
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Health-related quality of life is not impaired in children with undetected as well as diagnosed celiac disease: a large population based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Anna Myléus; Solveig Petersen; Annelie Carlsson; Solveig Hammarroth; Lotta Högberg; Anneli Ivarsson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  The serological diagnosis of coeliac disease - a step forward.

Authors:  Geoffrey Holmes; Carolina Ciacci
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2018

8.  Value of biopsy in a cohort of children with high-titer celiac serologies: observation of dynamic policy differences between Europe and North America.

Authors:  Kamran Badizadegan; David M Vanlandingham; Wesley Hampton; Kimberly M Thompson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Deciphering the Transcriptomic Heterogeneity of Duodenal Coeliac Disease Biopsies.

Authors:  Johannes Wolf; Edith Willscher; Henry Loeffler-Wirth; Maria Schmidt; Gunter Flemming; Marlen Zurek; Holm H Uhlig; Norman Händel; Hans Binder
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Improving coeliac disease risk prediction by testing non-HLA variants additional to HLA variants.

Authors:  Jihane Romanos; Anna Rosén; Vinod Kumar; Gosia Trynka; Lude Franke; Agata Szperl; Javier Gutierrez-Achury; Cleo C van Diemen; Roan Kanninga; Soesma A Jankipersadsing; Andrea Steck; Georges Eisenbarth; David A van Heel; Bozena Cukrowska; Valentina Bruno; Maria Cristina Mazzilli; Concepcion Núñez; Jose Ramon Bilbao; M Luisa Mearin; Donatella Barisani; Marian Rewers; Jill M Norris; Anneli Ivarsson; H Marieke Boezen; Edwin Liu; Cisca Wijmenga
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 23.059

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.