Literature DB >> 21502444

High-quality, low-cost gastrectomy care at high-volume hospitals: results from a population-based study in South Korea.

Jung A Lee1, Jong Hyock Park, Eun Jung Lee, So Young Kim, Yoon Kim, Sang Il Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate associations among hospital volume, costs, and length of stay (LOS) and to assess whether reduced hospital cost of care adversely affected quality of care.
DESIGN: Four-year, nationwide, population-based study.
SETTING: Data were obtained from claims submitted to the South Korean National Health Insurance database. PATIENTS: We identified 48 938 patients at 274 hospitals who had undergone gastric resection from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2005. Hospital volumes were divided into quartiles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographics and socioeconomic and clinical variables were investigated as factors that might affect costs and LOS.
RESULTS: Independent predictors of higher costs and longer LOS included older age, increased Charlson score, and hospitals with fewer beds. After adjusting for relevant factors, an inverse relationship between volume and costs or LOS was found such that higher-volume hospitals had the lowest procedure costs and LOS. Results showed no association between hospital cost and quality of care.
CONCLUSIONS: Higher hospital volume is predictive of lower costs and LOS for patients undergoing gastric resection. By referring these patients to high-volume centers, we may improve quality of care and reduce costs. Furthermore, high-quality care can be maintained when costs are lowered due to high volume.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21502444     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  6 in total

1.  Improvement of diabetes and hypertension after gastrectomy: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Eun Kyung Lee; So Young Kim; You Jin Lee; Mi Hyang Kwak; Hak Jin Kim; Il Ju Choi; Soo-Jeong Cho; Young Woo Kim; Jong Yeul Lee; Chan Gyoo Kim; Hong Man Yoon; Bang Wool Eom; Sun-Young Kong; Min Kyong Yoo; Jong Hyock Park; Keun Won Ryu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Are we lacking economic evaluations in gastric cancer treatment?

Authors:  Alyson L Mahar; Abraham El-Sedfy; Savtaj S Brar; Ana Johnson; Natalie Coburn
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Economic impacts of care by high-volume providers for non-curative esophagogastric cancer: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Julie Hallet; Nicole J Look Hong; Victoria Zuk; Laura E Davis; Vaibhav Gupta; Craig C Earle; Nicole Mittmann; Natalie G Coburn
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Multivisceral Resection for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  John G Aversa; Laurence P Diggs; Brendan L Hagerty; Dana A Dominguez; Philip H G Ituarte; Jonathan M Hernandez; Jeremy L Davis; Andrew M Blakely
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Disparities in Utilization and Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Techniques for Gastric Cancer Surgery in the United States.

Authors:  Joon Y Park; Arjun Verma; Zachary K Tran; Michael A Mederos; Peyman Benharash; Mark Girgis
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Diagnostic value of clinical T staging assessed by endoscopy and stomach protocol computed tomography in gastric cancer: the experience of a low-volume institute.

Authors:  Tae Hyeon Kim; Jeong Jae Kim; Seung Hyoung Kim; Bong Soo Kim; Hyun Joo Song; Soo Young Na; Sun Jin Boo; Heung Up Kim; Young Hee Maeng; Chang Lim Hyun; Kwang Sig Kim; In Ho Jeong
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.720

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.