OBJECTIVES: To evaluate associations among hospital volume, costs, and length of stay (LOS) and to assess whether reduced hospital cost of care adversely affected quality of care. DESIGN: Four-year, nationwide, population-based study. SETTING: Data were obtained from claims submitted to the South Korean National Health Insurance database. PATIENTS: We identified 48 938 patients at 274 hospitals who had undergone gastric resection from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2005. Hospital volumes were divided into quartiles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographics and socioeconomic and clinical variables were investigated as factors that might affect costs and LOS. RESULTS: Independent predictors of higher costs and longer LOS included older age, increased Charlson score, and hospitals with fewer beds. After adjusting for relevant factors, an inverse relationship between volume and costs or LOS was found such that higher-volume hospitals had the lowest procedure costs and LOS. Results showed no association between hospital cost and quality of care. CONCLUSIONS: Higher hospital volume is predictive of lower costs and LOS for patients undergoing gastric resection. By referring these patients to high-volume centers, we may improve quality of care and reduce costs. Furthermore, high-quality care can be maintained when costs are lowered due to high volume.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate associations among hospital volume, costs, and length of stay (LOS) and to assess whether reduced hospital cost of care adversely affected quality of care. DESIGN: Four-year, nationwide, population-based study. SETTING: Data were obtained from claims submitted to the South Korean National Health Insurance database. PATIENTS: We identified 48 938 patients at 274 hospitals who had undergone gastric resection from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2005. Hospital volumes were divided into quartiles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographics and socioeconomic and clinical variables were investigated as factors that might affect costs and LOS. RESULTS: Independent predictors of higher costs and longer LOS included older age, increased Charlson score, and hospitals with fewer beds. After adjusting for relevant factors, an inverse relationship between volume and costs or LOS was found such that higher-volume hospitals had the lowest procedure costs and LOS. Results showed no association between hospital cost and quality of care. CONCLUSIONS: Higher hospital volume is predictive of lower costs and LOS for patients undergoing gastric resection. By referring these patients to high-volume centers, we may improve quality of care and reduce costs. Furthermore, high-quality care can be maintained when costs are lowered due to high volume.
Authors: Eun Kyung Lee; So Young Kim; You Jin Lee; Mi Hyang Kwak; Hak Jin Kim; Il Ju Choi; Soo-Jeong Cho; Young Woo Kim; Jong Yeul Lee; Chan Gyoo Kim; Hong Man Yoon; Bang Wool Eom; Sun-Young Kong; Min Kyong Yoo; Jong Hyock Park; Keun Won Ryu Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Julie Hallet; Nicole J Look Hong; Victoria Zuk; Laura E Davis; Vaibhav Gupta; Craig C Earle; Nicole Mittmann; Natalie G Coburn Journal: Gastric Cancer Date: 2019-12-13 Impact factor: 7.370
Authors: John G Aversa; Laurence P Diggs; Brendan L Hagerty; Dana A Dominguez; Philip H G Ituarte; Jonathan M Hernandez; Jeremy L Davis; Andrew M Blakely Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2020-07-23 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Joon Y Park; Arjun Verma; Zachary K Tran; Michael A Mederos; Peyman Benharash; Mark Girgis Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-01-07 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Tae Hyeon Kim; Jeong Jae Kim; Seung Hyoung Kim; Bong Soo Kim; Hyun Joo Song; Soo Young Na; Sun Jin Boo; Heung Up Kim; Young Hee Maeng; Chang Lim Hyun; Kwang Sig Kim; In Ho Jeong Journal: J Gastric Cancer Date: 2012-12-31 Impact factor: 3.720