Literature DB >> 21502337

The role of the hippocampus in retaining relational information across short delays: the importance of memory load.

Annette Jeneson1, Kristin N Mauldin, Ramona O Hopkins, Larry R Squire.   

Abstract

Patients with hippocampal damage are sometimes impaired at remembering information across delays as short as a few seconds. How are these impairments to be understood? One possibility is that retention of some kinds of information is critically dependent on the hippocampus, regardless of the retention interval and regardless of whether the task depends on working memory or long-term memory. Alternatively, retention may be dependent on the hippocampus only when the task involves a memory load large enough to exceed working memory capacity. To explore these possibilities, we assessed the performance of patients with hippocampal lesions on two tasks requiring retention of the same object-in-scene information across a brief delay. The tasks placed different demands on memory. In one task, which used a continuous recognition format, participants needed to try to hold up to nine scenes in mind, even when no scene intervened between the study scene and the corresponding test scene. Patients were impaired in this condition. In a second task, using a conventional study-test format, participants needed to hold in mind only one scene at a time for either 3 or 14 sec. With this procedure, patients performed as well as controls after a 3-sec delay but were impaired after a 14-sec delay. We suggest that retention of object-in-scene information is dependent on the hippocampus only when working memory is insufficient to support performance (because memory load is high or the retention interval is long). In these circumstances performance depends, at least in part, on long-term memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21502337      PMCID: PMC3083641          DOI: 10.1101/lm.2010711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  37 in total

1.  Binding in short-term visual memory.

Authors:  Mary E Wheeler; Anne M Treisman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2002-03

2.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 3.  Working memory: looking back and looking forward.

Authors:  Alan Baddeley
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects.

Authors:  G A Alvarez; P Cavanagh
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-02

5.  The nature of change detection and online representations of scenes.

Authors:  Jennifer D Ryan; Neal J Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.

Authors:  S J Luck; E K Vogel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Disorders of learning and memory after temporal lobe lesions in man.

Authors:  B Milner
Journal:  Clin Neurosurg       Date:  1972

8.  Memory and the hippocampal complex. II. Is memory a multiple process?

Authors:  D A Drachman; J Arbit
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1966-07

9.  Intact working memory for relational information after medial temporal lobe damage.

Authors:  Annette Jeneson; Kristin N Mauldin; Larry R Squire
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Intact verbal and nonverbal short-term memory following damage to the human hippocampus.

Authors:  C B Cave; L R Squire
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.899

View more
  33 in total

1.  Neural evidence for a distinction between short-term memory and the focus of attention.

Authors:  Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock; Andrew T Drysdale; Klaus Oberauer; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Memory for items and relationships among items embedded in realistic scenes: disproportionate relational memory impairments in amnesia.

Authors:  Deborah E Hannula; Daniel Tranel; John S Allen; Brenda A Kirchhoff; Allison E Nickel; Neal J Cohen
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 3.  Covert rapid action-memory simulation (CRAMS): a hypothesis of hippocampal-prefrontal interactions for adaptive behavior.

Authors:  Jane X Wang; Neal J Cohen; Joel L Voss
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 4.  Conscious and unconscious memory systems.

Authors:  Larry R Squire; Adam J O Dede
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 10.005

5.  Egocentric and allocentric visuospatial working memory in premotor Huntington's disease: A double dissociation with caudate and hippocampal volumes.

Authors:  Katherine L Possin; Hosung Kim; Michael D Geschwind; Tacie Moskowitz; Erica T Johnson; Sharon J Sha; Alexandra Apple; Duan Xu; Bruce L Miller; Steven Finkbeiner; Christopher P Hess; Joel H Kramer
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Glucose and memory: the influence of drink, expectancy, and beliefs.

Authors:  Brian Stollery; Leonie Christian
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  The special role of item-context associations in the direct-access region of working memory.

Authors:  Guillermo Campoy
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-07-25

8.  Visual short-term memory for high resolution associations is impaired in patients with medial temporal lobe damage.

Authors:  Joshua D Koen; Alyssa A Borders; Michael T Petzold; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 3.899

9.  Intrinsic hippocampal activity as a biomarker for cognition and symptoms in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jason R Tregellas; Jason Smucny; Josette G Harris; Ann Olincy; Keeran Maharajh; Eugene Kronberg; Lindsay C Eichman; Emma Lyons; Robert Freedman
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  Dissociation of active working memory and passive recognition in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Benjamin M Basile; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.