Literature DB >> 21501894

Accelerated takedown of the paramedian forehead flap at 1 week: indications, technique, and improving patient quality of life.

Brian Somoano1, Jeremy Kampp, Hayes B Gladstone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The paramedian forehead flap (PFF) is a common method of reconstruction for large nasal defects. Generally, surgeons divide this flap at 3 weeks. This delay can result in a significant decrease in the quality of life for these patients.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe the indications and technique for trunk division at 1 week after PFF reconstruction, and to evaluate the clinical outcomes.
METHODS: This was a case series of consecutive patients undergoing primarily nasal defect reconstruction by PFF repair during the past 6 years. We explored medical record review of associated complications, patient rating of impact on quality of life and final results of repair, and patient preferences regarding time to flap division.
RESULTS: A total of 26 patients underwent accelerated trunk division at a mean of 7.2 days. Of these, 27% had a history of tobacco use, 23% were diabetic, and 19% had cartilage grafts used in their repairs. None developed necrosis and other complications were minor. Most patients considered their trunk very disfiguring, preventing them from daily activities. This was especially true for those younger than 70 years. Of all patients, 94% preferred trunk division at 1 week, rather than 3 weeks. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study design and number of patients were limitations.
CONCLUSION: PFF trunk division at 1 week is safe and effective for resurfacing of large nasal defects, including those reconstructions that require cartilage. Younger and healthier patients may be the most ideal candidates for accelerated division given the greater negative impact of an intact trunk on their lives.
Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21501894     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.01.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  5 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of Nasolabial Flap Versus Paramedian Forehead Flap for Nasal Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sourabh Shankar Chakraborty; Akhil Dhanesh Goel; Ranjit Kumar Sahu; Manojit Midya; Sudeshna Acharya; Neha Shakrawal
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 2.708

2.  Complete division of the pedicle of the forehead flap is possible after 1 week of engraftment in selected patients.

Authors:  Moritz Felcht; Tino Wetzig
Journal:  JAAD Int       Date:  2020-11-30

3.  Indocyanine green near-infrared laser angiography predicts timing for the division of a forehead flap.

Authors:  Joani M Christensen; Donald P Baumann; Jeffrey N Myers; Kate Buretta; Justin M Sacks
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2012-08-31

4.  A national multi-institutional analysis of predictors of surgical site complications and unplanned reoperation after paramedian forehead flap reconstruction.

Authors:  Garrett Ni; Rohan Brebion; Pablo A Baltodano; Michael C Coronado; Nicholas Elmer; Theresa K Webster; Huaqing Zhao; Xiaoning Lu; Sthefano Araya; Sameer Patel
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2022-06-29

5.  Spectacles under Pedicles: Eyewear Modification with the Paramedian Forehead Flap.

Authors:  Linda T Qu; John P Kelpin; Mitchell G Eichhorn; Ewa Komorowska-Timek
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-08-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.