Literature DB >> 21501856

An assessment of the fate, behaviour and environmental risk associated with sunscreen TiO₂ nanoparticles in UK field scenarios.

Andrew C Johnson1, Michael J Bowes, Alison Crossley, Helen P Jarvie, Kerstin Jurkschat, Monika D Jürgens, Alan J Lawlor, Barry Park, Phillip Rowland, David Spurgeon, Claus Svendsen, Ian P Thompson, Robert J Barnes, Richard J Williams, Nan Xu.   

Abstract

The fate of Ti was examined in an activated sludge plant serving over 200,000 people. These studies revealed a decrease of 30 to 3.2 μg/L of Ti < 0.45 μm from influent to effluent and a calculated Ti presence of 305 mg/kg DW in wasted sludge. Thus, using sludge as a fertiliser would result in a predicted deposition of up to 250 mg/m² of Ti to soil surfaces using a recommended maximal agricultural application rate. Given the major use of TiO₂ in many industrial and domestic applications where loss to the sewer is possible, this measured Ti was presumed to have been largely TiO₂, a proportion of which will be nanoparticle sized. To assess the behaviour of engineered nanoparticle (ENP) TiO₂ in sewage and toxicology studies, Optisol (Oxonica Materials Ltd) and P25 (Evonik Industries AG), which are representative of forms used in sunscreen and cosmetic products, were used. These revealed a close association of TiO₂ ENPs with activated sludge. Using commercial information on consumption, and removal rates for sewage treatment, predictions were made for river water concentrations for sunscreen TiO₂ ENPs for the Anglian and Thames regions in Southern England. The highest predicted value from these exercises was 8.8 μg/L for the Thames region in which it was assumed that one in four people used the recommended application of sunscreen during a low flow (Q95) period. Ecotoxicological studies using potentially vulnerable species indicated that 1000 μg/L TiO₂ ENP did not affect the viability of a mixed community of river bacteria in the presence of UV light. Direct exposure to TiO₂ ENPs did not impair the immuno-effectiveness of earthworm coelomocyte cells at concentrations greatly above those predicted for sewage sludge.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21501856     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.03.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  12 in total

Review 1.  Analytical approaches to support current understanding of exposure, uptake and distributions of engineered nanoparticles by aquatic and terrestrial organisms.

Authors:  Carolin Schultz; Kate Powell; Alison Crossley; Kerstin Jurkschat; Peter Kille; A John Morgan; Daniel Read; William Tyne; Elma Lahive; Claus Svendsen; David J Spurgeon
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Study of mitochondrial swelling, membrane fluidity and ROS production induced by nano-TiO2 and prevented by Fe incorporation.

Authors:  Tejal Barkhade; Santosh Kumar Mahapatra; Indrani Banerjee
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.524

3.  Considerations of Environmentally Relevant Test Conditions for Improved Evaluation of Ecological Hazards of Engineered Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Patricia A Holden; Jorge L Gardea-Torresdey; Fred Klaessig; Ronald F Turco; Monika Mortimer; Kerstin Hund-Rinke; Elaine A Cohen Hubal; David Avery; Damià Barceló; Renata Behra; Yoram Cohen; Laurence Deydier-Stephan; P Lee Ferguson; Teresa F Fernandes; Barbara Herr Harthorn; W Matthew Henderson; Robert A Hoke; Danail Hristozov; John M Johnston; Agnes B Kane; Larry Kapustka; Arturo A Keller; Hunter S Lenihan; Wess Lovell; Catherine J Murphy; Roger M Nisbet; Elijah J Petersen; Edward R Salinas; Martin Scheringer; Monita Sharma; David E Speed; Yasir Sultan; Paul Westerhoff; Jason C White; Mark R Wiesner; Eva M Wong; Baoshan Xing; Meghan Steele Horan; Hilary A Godwin; André E Nel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Parametric estimation of P(X > Y) for normal distributions in the context of probabilistic environmental risk assessment.

Authors:  Rianne Jacobs; Andriëtte A Bekker; Hilko van der Voet; Cajo J F Ter Braak
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Modeling flows and concentrations of nine engineered nanomaterials in the Danish environment.

Authors:  Fadri Gottschalk; Carsten Lassen; Jesper Kjoelholt; Frans Christensen; Bernd Nowack
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Toxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles to Escherichia coli: effects of particle size, crystal phase and water chemistry.

Authors:  Xiuchun Lin; Jingyi Li; Si Ma; Gesheng Liu; Kun Yang; Meiping Tong; Daohui Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Nano silver and nano zinc-oxide in surface waters - exposure estimation for Europe at high spatial and temporal resolution.

Authors:  Egon Dumont; Andrew C Johnson; Virginie D J Keller; Richard J Williams
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 8.071

8.  A citizen science approach estimating titanium dioxide released from personal care products.

Authors:  Fan Wu; Matt Seib; Samantha Mauel; Sydney Klinzing; Andrea L Hicks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The presence of contaminations in sewage sludge - The current situation.

Authors:  Krzysztof Fijalkowski; Agnieszka Rorat; Anna Grobelak; Malgorzata J Kacprzak
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 6.789

10.  Influence of material properties on TiO2 nanoparticle agglomeration.

Authors:  Dongxu Zhou; Zhaoxia Ji; Xingmao Jiang; Darren R Dunphy; Jeffrey Brinker; Arturo A Keller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.