Literature DB >> 21501384

Characterization of a thiamin diphosphate-dependent phenylpyruvate decarboxylase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Malea M Kneen1, Razvan Stan, Alejandra Yep, Ryan P Tyler, Choedchai Saehuan, Michael J McLeish.   

Abstract

The product of the ARO10 gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae was initially identified as a thiamine diphosphate-dependent phenylpyruvate decarboxylase with a broad substrate specificity. It was suggested that the enzyme could be responsible for the catabolism of aromatic and branched-chain amino acids, as well as methionine. In the present study, we report the overexpression of the ARO10 gene product in Escherichia coli and the first detailed in vitro characterization of this enzyme. The enzyme is shown to be an efficient aromatic 2-keto acid decarboxylase, consistent with it playing a major in vivo role in phenylalanine, tryptophan and possibly also tyrosine catabolism. However, its substrate spectrum suggests that it is unlikely to play any significant role in the catabolism of the branched-chain amino acids or of methionine. A homology model was used to identify residues likely to be involved in substrate specificity. Site-directed mutagenesis on those residues confirmed previous studies indicating that mutation of single residues is unlikely to produce the immediate conversion of an aromatic into an aliphatic 2-keto acid decarboxylase. In addition, the enzyme was compared with the phenylpyruvate decarboxylase from Azospirillum brasilense and the indolepyruvate decarboxylase from Enterobacter cloacae. We show that the properties of the two phenylpyruvate decarboxylases are similar in some respects yet quite different in others, and that the properties of both are distinct from those of the indolepyruvate decarboxylase. Finally, we demonstrate that it is unlikely that replacement of a glutamic acid by leucine leads to discrimination between phenylpyruvate and indolepyruvate, although, in this case, it did lead to unexpected allosteric activation.
© 2011 The Authors Journal compilation © 2011 FEBS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21501384     DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08103.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEBS J        ISSN: 1742-464X            Impact factor:   5.542


  13 in total

Review 1.  Thiamine: a key nutrient for yeasts during wine alcoholic fermentation.

Authors:  Pwj Labuschagne; B Divol
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  The Mandelate Pathway, an Alternative to the Phenylalanine Ammonia Lyase Pathway for the Synthesis of Benzenoids in Ascomycete Yeasts.

Authors:  Maria Jose Valera; Eduardo Boido; Juan Carlos Ramos; Eduardo Manta; Rafael Radi; Eduardo Dellacassa; Francisco Carrau
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Production of C4 and C5 branched-chain alcohols by engineered Escherichia. coli.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Chen; Jingliang Xu; Liu Yang; Zhenhong Yuan; Shiyuan Xiao; Yu Zhang; Cuiyi Liang; Minchao He; Ying Guo
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  The Characterization of an Efficient Phenylpyruvate Decarboxylase KDC4427, Involved in 2-Phenylethanol and IAA Production from Bacterial Enterobacter sp. CGMCC 5087.

Authors:  Wenzhi Bao; Xing Li; Jinfeng Liu; Rong Zheng; Lijuan Liu; Haibo Zhang
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-04-04

5.  Substrate specificity of thiamine pyrophosphate-dependent 2-oxo-acid decarboxylases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Gabriele Romagnoli; Marijke A H Luttik; Peter Kötter; Jack T Pronk; Jean-Marc Daran
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Defining intermediates and redundancies in coenzyme Q precursor biosynthesis.

Authors:  Kyle P Robinson; Adam Jochem; Sheila E Johnson; Thiruchelvi R Reddy; Jason D Russell; Joshua J Coon; David J Pagliarini
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Metabolic engineering of a synergistic pathway for n-butanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Shuobo Shi; Tong Si; Zihe Liu; Hongfang Zhang; Ee Lui Ang; Huimin Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Improvement of Xylose Fermentation Ability under Heat and Acid Co-Stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Using Genome Shuffling Technique.

Authors:  Kentaro Inokuma; Ryo Iwamoto; Takahiro Bamba; Tomohisa Hasunuma; Akihiko Kondo
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2017-12-20

9.  GAT1 Gene, the GATA Transcription Activator, Regulates the Production of Higher Alcohol during Wheat Beer Fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ya-Ping Wang; Lin Liu; Xue-Shan Wang; Kun-Qiang Hong; Li-Hua Zhang; Zhong-Guan Sun; Dong-Guang Xiao
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08

10.  Evidence for loss and reacquisition of alcoholic fermentation in a fructophilic yeast lineage.

Authors:  Carla Gonçalves; Jennifer H Wisecaver; Jacek Kominek; Madalena Salema Oom; Maria José Leandro; Xing-Xing Shen; Dana A Opulente; Xiaofan Zhou; David Peris; Cletus P Kurtzman; Chris Todd Hittinger; Antonis Rokas; Paula Gonçalves
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.