Literature DB >> 21500934

Response rates track the history of reinforcement times.

Justin A Harris1, Saba Gharaei, Hannah L Pincham.   

Abstract

When conditioning involves a consistent temporal relationship between the conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (US), the expression of conditioned responses within a trial peaks at the usual time of the US relative to the CS. Here we examine the temporal profile of responses during conditioning with variable CS-US intervals. We conditioned stimuli with either uniformly distributed or exponentially distributed random CS-US intervals. In the former case, the frequency of each CS-US interval within a specified range is uniform but the momentary probability of the US (the hazard function) increases as time elapses during the trial; with the latter distribution, short CS-US intervals are more frequent than longer intervals, but the momentary probability of the US is constant across time within the trial. We report that, in a magazine approach paradigm, rats' response rates remained stable as time elapses during the CS when the CS-US intervals were uniformly distributed, whereas their response rates declined when the CS-US intervals were exponentially distributed. In other words, the profile of responding during the CS matched the frequency distribution of the US times, not the momentary probability of the US during the CS. These results are inconsistent with real-time associative models, which predict that associative strength tracks the momentary probability of the US, but may provide support for timing models of conditioning in which conditioned responding is tied to remembered times of reinforcement. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21500934     DOI: 10.1037/a0023079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  8 in total

Review 1.  Temporal contingency.

Authors:  C R Gallistel; Andrew R Craig; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 2.  Adjunctive behaviors are operants.

Authors:  Peter R Killeen; Ricardo Pellón
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Everywhere and everything: The power and ubiquity of time.

Authors:  Andrew T Marshall; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Int J Comp Psychol       Date:  2015

4.  Hazard function effects on promoting self-control in variable interval time-based interventions in rats.

Authors:  Carrie Bailey; Kelsey Panfil; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effects of conditioned stimulus (CS) duration, intertrial interval, and I/T ratio on appetitive Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Eric A Thrailkill; Travis P Todd; Mark E Bouton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 2.478

6.  Blood pressure variations real-time reflect the conditioned fear learning and memory.

Authors:  Yuan-Chang Hsu; Lung Yu; Hsiun-ing Chen; Hui-Ling Lee; Yu-Min Kuo; Chauying J Jen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Delay of reinforcement versus rate of reinforcement in Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Joseph M Austen; David J Sanderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.478

8.  The effects of stimulus distribution form during trace conditioning.

Authors:  Charlotte Bonardi; Dómhnall J Jennings
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.143

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.