Literature DB >> 21500928

The role of stimulus comparison in human perceptual learning: effects of distractor placement.

Dominic M Dwyer1, Matthew E Mundy, Robert C Honey.   

Abstract

Within-subjects procedures were used to assess the influence of stimulus comparison on perceptual learning in humans. In Experiment 1, participants received intermixed (A, A', A, A',…) or blocked (B, B,…, B', B',…) exposure to pairs of similar female faces. In a subsequent same/different discrimination task, participants were more accurate when the test involved A and A' than when it involved B and B' (or novel faces: C and C'). This perceptual learning effect was reduced by placing a visual distractor (*: either another face or a checkerboard) between successive presentations of the faces during the exposure stage (e.g., A - * - A'). The attenuation of the intermixed versus blocked difference was particularly marked when faces were used as the distractor. In Experiment 2, this reduction in perceptual learning was more marked when * was positioned between the pairs of intermixed faces (i.e., A - * - A') than when it preceded and succeeded those faces (i.e., * - A - A' - *). These results provide the first direct evidence that the opportunity to compare stimuli plays a causal role in supporting perceptual learning. They also support the specific view that perceptual learning reflects an interaction between a short-term habituation process, that ordinarily biases processing away from the frequently presented common elements and toward their less frequently presented unique elements, and a long-term representational process that reflects this bias. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21500928     DOI: 10.1037/a0023078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  5 in total

Review 1.  Visual category learning: Navigating the intersection of rules and similarity.

Authors:  Gregory I Hughes; Ayanna K Thomas
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-01-19

2.  Putting category learning in order: Category structure and temporal arrangement affect the benefit of interleaved over blocked study.

Authors:  Paulo F Carvalho; Robert L Goldstone
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-04

Review 3.  What you learn is more than what you see: what can sequencing effects tell us about inductive category learning?

Authors:  Paulo F Carvalho; Robert L Goldstone
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-30

4.  Learning faces: similar comparator faces do not improve performance.

Authors:  Scott P Jones; Dominic M Dwyer; Michael B Lewis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Brain correlates of experience-dependent changes in stimulus discrimination based on the amount and schedule of exposure.

Authors:  Matthew E Mundy; Paul E Downing; Robert C Honey; Krish D Singh; Kim S Graham; Dominic M Dwyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.