OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at assessing the evolution of cardiovascular characteristics during hemodialysis and ultrafiltration by a perturbation accurately defined in its magnitude and directly relevant to the problem of volume adjustment in stable hemodialysis patients. METHODS: Excess fluid volume was removed by constant ultrafiltration-rate as prescribed. Hemodynamic variables were continuously measured throughout treatments using non-invasive finger plethysmography. In addition to ongoing volume reduction by ultrafiltration (long-term perturbation), well-defined magnitudes of intravascular volume were transiently and reversibly sequestered (short-term perturbation) into the extracorporeal circulation at hourly intervals. Sensitivities of hemodynamic variables and of the baroreflex to the acute change in intravascular volume (volume sensitivities) were analyzed. RESULTS: Eight stable patients were assessed during two subsequent treatments. Treatments were accompanied by a decrease in cardiac output (p<0.05) and stroke volume (p<0.01), and by an increase in peripheral resistance (p<0.05) and diastolic pressure (p<0.05). Mean arterial pressure remained unchanged for the whole group but correlated with the change in total peripheral resistance in individual treatments (p<0.01). The average volume sensitivity of mean arterial pressure was 11.9±9.9 mmHg/L and increased (p<0.01) during treatments, while the average volume sensitivity of heart rate remained unchanged at -7.9±8.58 1/(min L). The corresponding volume sensitivity of the baroreflex was -0.81±1.5 1/(min mmHg) and remained unchanged for the whole group, but the change correlated with the change in mean arterial pressure in individual treatments (p<0.05). INTERPRETATION: The changes in arterial pressures during hemodialysis appear to relate to an unbalanced response of barocontrol mechanisms characterized by a compromised chronotropy and vascular over-reactivity.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at assessing the evolution of cardiovascular characteristics during hemodialysis and ultrafiltration by a perturbation accurately defined in its magnitude and directly relevant to the problem of volume adjustment in stable hemodialysis patients. METHODS: Excess fluid volume was removed by constant ultrafiltration-rate as prescribed. Hemodynamic variables were continuously measured throughout treatments using non-invasive finger plethysmography. In addition to ongoing volume reduction by ultrafiltration (long-term perturbation), well-defined magnitudes of intravascular volume were transiently and reversibly sequestered (short-term perturbation) into the extracorporeal circulation at hourly intervals. Sensitivities of hemodynamic variables and of the baroreflex to the acute change in intravascular volume (volume sensitivities) were analyzed. RESULTS: Eight stable patients were assessed during two subsequent treatments. Treatments were accompanied by a decrease in cardiac output (p<0.05) and stroke volume (p<0.01), and by an increase in peripheral resistance (p<0.05) and diastolic pressure (p<0.05). Mean arterial pressure remained unchanged for the whole group but correlated with the change in total peripheral resistance in individual treatments (p<0.01). The average volume sensitivity of mean arterial pressure was 11.9±9.9 mmHg/L and increased (p<0.01) during treatments, while the average volume sensitivity of heart rate remained unchanged at -7.9±8.58 1/(min L). The corresponding volume sensitivity of the baroreflex was -0.81±1.5 1/(min mmHg) and remained unchanged for the whole group, but the change correlated with the change in mean arterial pressure in individual treatments (p<0.05). INTERPRETATION: The changes in arterial pressures during hemodialysis appear to relate to an unbalanced response of barocontrol mechanisms characterized by a compromised chronotropy and vascular over-reactivity.
Authors: Dominique Laude; Jean-Luc Elghozi; Arlette Girard; Elisabeth Bellard; Malika Bouhaddi; Paolo Castiglioni; Catherine Cerutti; Andrei Cividjian; Marco Di Rienzo; Jacques-Olivier Fortrat; Ben Janssen; John M Karemaker; Georges Lefthériotis; Gianfranco Parati; Pontus B Persson; Alberto Porta; Luc Quintin; Jacques Regnard; Heinz Rüdiger; Harald M Stauss Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2003-09-18 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Stephen M Smith; John F Potter; Nilesh J Samani; Emily L Sammons; Wendy E Rathbone; Stephen Bentley; Ronney B Panerai Journal: Clin Physiol Funct Imaging Date: 2008-07-01 Impact factor: 2.273
Authors: Lindsay J Chesterton; Nicholas M Selby; James O Burton; Jana Fialova; Cian Chan; Chris W McIntyre Journal: Hemodial Int Date: 2009-11-03 Impact factor: 1.812
Authors: Esmée M Ettema; Johanna Kuipers; Martijn van Faassen; Henk Groen; Arie M van Roon; Joop D Lefrandt; Ralf Westerhuis; Ido P Kema; Harry van Goor; Ron T Gansevoort; Carlo A J M Gaillard; Casper F M Franssen Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2018-08-22 Impact factor: 2.388