Norbert Pfeiffer1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Mainz University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. pfeiffer@augen.klinik.uni-mainz.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and safety of timolol 0.5% versus brinzolamide 1.0% when added to travoprost monotherapy in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS:Patients meeting selection criteria (IOP one eye 19 mmHg and ≤32 mmHg and IOP both eyes ≤32 mmHg at 8:00 h) were switched to travoprost monotherapy for 4 weeks. Patients then insufficiently controlled on travoprost (IOP at 8:00 h ≥19 mmHg) at baseline were randomized to receive either travoprost and brinzolamide or travoprost and timolol in a double-masked fashion for 12 weeks. RESULTS:Two hundred and fifty-three patients underwent the 4-week run-in period. Switching to travoprost resulted in adequate IOP control (<19 mmHg) for 21.7% of patients. After 3 months of treatment, both drug combinations statistically significantly reduced the mean IOP at each time point (8:00, 12:00 and 16:00 h) and the mean diurnal IOP, which was 17.9 ± 2.6 mmHg for the brinzolamide group and 17.0 ± 3.2 mmHg for the timolol group. Both combinations were well-tolerated. However, a statistically significant difference occurred at 16:00 h, with pressures of 16.4 ± 3.2 mmHg and 17.3 ± 2.8 mmHg for the timolol and brinzolamide groups, respectively (p = 0.038). Fifty percent of patients reported one adverse event, whereas in 13.2% three or more adverse effects were named. Hyperemia was found most often (6.3% of the patients). CONCLUSION: Both adjunctive combinations moderately reduced IOP in patients inadequately controlled with travoprost monotherapy, with timolol being slightly stronger 8 hours after instillation. Adjunctive treatment with brinzolamide and travoprost may be an alternative for patients not tolerant or not responsive to treatment with timolol and travoprost.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and safety of timolol 0.5% versus brinzolamide 1.0% when added to travoprost monotherapy in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS:Patients meeting selection criteria (IOP one eye 19 mmHg and ≤32 mmHg and IOP both eyes ≤32 mmHg at 8:00 h) were switched to travoprost monotherapy for 4 weeks. Patients then insufficiently controlled on travoprost (IOP at 8:00 h ≥19 mmHg) at baseline were randomized to receive either travoprost and brinzolamide or travoprost and timolol in a double-masked fashion for 12 weeks. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-three patients underwent the 4-week run-in period. Switching to travoprost resulted in adequate IOP control (<19 mmHg) for 21.7% of patients. After 3 months of treatment, both drug combinations statistically significantly reduced the mean IOP at each time point (8:00, 12:00 and 16:00 h) and the mean diurnal IOP, which was 17.9 ± 2.6 mmHg for the brinzolamide group and 17.0 ± 3.2 mmHg for the timolol group. Both combinations were well-tolerated. However, a statistically significant difference occurred at 16:00 h, with pressures of 16.4 ± 3.2 mmHg and 17.3 ± 2.8 mmHg for the timolol and brinzolamide groups, respectively (p = 0.038). Fifty percent of patients reported one adverse event, whereas in 13.2% three or more adverse effects were named. Hyperemia was found most often (6.3% of the patients). CONCLUSION: Both adjunctive combinations moderately reduced IOP in patients inadequately controlled with travoprost monotherapy, with timolol being slightly stronger 8 hours after instillation. Adjunctive treatment with brinzolamide and travoprost may be an alternative for patients not tolerant or not responsive to treatment with timolol and travoprost.
Authors: G Holló; D Chiselita; N Petkova; B Cvenkel; I Liehneova; B Izgi; A Berta; J Szaflik; E Turacli; W C Stewart Journal: Eur J Ophthalmol Date: 2006 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.597
Authors: J García-Feijoo; J M Martínez-de-la-Casa; A Castillo; C Méndez; A Fernández-Vidal; J García-Sánchez Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 2.580
Authors: P A Netland; T Landry; E K Sullivan; R Andrew; L Silver; A Weiner; S Mallick; J Dickerson; M V Bergamini; S M Robertson; A A Davis Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: J M Martinez-de-la-Casa; A Castillo; J Garcia-Feijoo; C Mendez-Hernandez; A Fernandez-Vidal; J Garcia-Sanchez Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 2.580
Authors: Katharina Bell; Christina Korb; Christina Butsch; Bert Constantin Giers; Anna Beck; Alicja Strzalkowska; Christian Ruckes; Ulrike Klingberg; Norbert Pfeiffer; Katrin Lorenz Journal: J Ophthalmol Date: 2022-07-20 Impact factor: 1.974