Literature DB >> 2149972

Reflections on the pathogenesis of Down syndrome.

J M Opitz1, E F Gilbert-Barness.   

Abstract

Present efforts to identify, isolate, and characterize in molecular terms the "consensus" segment of 21q sufficient to cause most of the major and some of the most characteristic minor manifestations of Down syndrome will soon provide answers to many questions. However, we think that a reductionist approach to explain the Down syndrome phenotype in a "linear" manner from the DNA sequence of the segment will be doomed to failure from the outset because of the open, complex, nonlinear, hierarchical nature of morphogenetic systems. Neo-Darwinism is under strong attack; most genetic changes accumulated over time may very well be of neutral effect, and detailed studies in several related groups of vertebrate species has shown that molecular and organismal evolution are largely independent of one another. It has been pointed out recently that biology lacks a theory of ontogenetic and phylogenetic development, and that a purely "genocentric" view of biology at the expense of the complexly hierarchical intrinsic epigenetic attributes of developmental systems is "out of focus with respect to ... biological organization and morphogenesis," and may be "a residue of nineteenth century romantic idealism." Down syndrome impresses us as a paradigm of increased developmental variability due to a deceleration of the rate of development (neoteny) with many anomalies of incomplete morphogenesis (vestigia), atavisms, increased morphometric variability with many decreased means, increased variances, and increased fluctuating asymmetry. These abnormalities, together with highly increased risk of prenatal death and postnatal morbidity, impaired growth, and abnormal CNS and gonadal structure and function characteristic of most aneuploidy syndromes, suggest to us that the pathogenesis of Down syndrome is best viewed in terms of the mechanisms of speciation. Transgenic experiment involving sequential or overlapping pieces of "the consensus segment" on distal 21q22.1-22.3 may help decide to what extent the Down syndrome phenotype can be resolved into the additive effect of several pleiotropic oligogenes with epistatic interaction or the indirect secondary "mass" effect of a specific segment of 21q with epistatic interaction involving multiple loci on 21q and other chromosomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2149972     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320370707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet Suppl        ISSN: 1040-3787


  5 in total

1.  The Influence of trisomy 21 on facial form and variability.

Authors:  John M Starbuck; Theodore M Cole; Roger H Reeves; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.802

2.  The innate immune system stimulating cytokine GM-CSF improves learning/memory and interneuron and astrocyte brain pathology in Dp16 Down syndrome mice and improves learning/memory in wild-type mice.

Authors:  Md Mahiuddin Ahmed; Athena Ching-Jung Wang; Mihret Elos; Heidi J Chial; Stefan Sillau; D Adriana Solano; Christina Coughlan; Leila Aghili; Paige Anton; Neil Markham; Vanesa Adame; Katheleen J Gardiner; Timothy D Boyd; Huntington Potter
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 7.046

Review 3.  Modeling neurodevelopmental disorders using human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Michael Telias; Dalit Ben-Yosef
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 4.  Theories of schizophrenia: a genetic-inflammatory-vascular synthesis.

Authors:  Daniel R Hanson; Irving I Gottesman
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2005-02-11       Impact factor: 2.103

5.  Implications of Down's syndrome on oral health status in patients: A prevalence-based study.

Authors:  E V Soma Sekhar Goud; Saakshi Gulati; Akriti Agrawal; Pooja Pani; K Nishant; Samarjeet J Pattnaik; Shivam Gupta
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-11-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.