Literature DB >> 21499161

Bare platinum vs matrix detachable coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a multivariate logistic regression analysis and review of the literature.

Michelle J Smith1, Justin Mascitelli, Alejandro Santillan, Jennifer Sousa Brennan, A John Tsiouris, Howard A Riina, Y Pierre Gobin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing acceptance of endovascular coiling for treating intracranial aneurysms, incomplete occlusion remains a limitation. Attempts to reduce recanalization have prompted creation of polyglycolic/polylactic acid-coated (Matrix) coils shown to improve neointima formation; however, previous publications demonstrate conflicting results regarding their efficacy. Few studies account for factors influencing recurrence, and only 4 studies include bare platinum (BP) coil control groups.
OBJECTIVE: To compare initial and short- and mid-term occlusion as well as retreatment rates using Matrix compared with BP coils.
METHODS: Retrospective review of patients undergoing coiling of cerebral aneurysms from 2001 to 2005 was performed. Analysis included a multivariate logistic regression model designed to detect a 35% absolute difference in initial occlusion between coil treatment groups with 80% power.
RESULTS: Complete initial occlusion was achieved in 64% of BP (n = 45) and 63% of Matrix (n = 56) cases (P = 1.0). Follow-up occlusion rates in the short term and mid term were 52% and 60%, respectively, for BP cases and 42% and 67%, respectively, for Matrix cases (P = .24 and P = .38, respectively). After adjusting for size, morphology, volumetric packing density, location, rupture, and balloon remodeling, no difference in initial and subsequent occlusion or retreatment rates for BP coils versus Matrix coils was appreciated.
CONCLUSION: After controlling for factors influencing recanalization, this investigation failed to show a significant difference between coil groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21499161     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31821a86da

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  5 in total

1.  Autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells improve healing of coiled experimental saccular aneurysms: an angiographic and histopathological study.

Authors:  Aymeric Rouchaud; Waleed Brinjikji; Daying Dai; Yong-Hong Ding; Tina Gunderson; Dana Schroeder; Laurent Spelle; David F Kallmes; Ramanathan Kadirvel
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 5.836

2.  In memoriam: the matrix coil.

Authors:  W J van Rooij; M Sluzewski; J Peluso
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Bioactive versus bare platinum coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: the MAPS (Matrix and Platinum Science) trial.

Authors:  C G McDougall; S Claiborne Johnston; A Gholkar; S L Barnwell; J C Vazquez Suarez; J Massó Romero; J C Chaloupka; A Bonafe; A K Wakhloo; D Tampieri; C F Dowd; A J Fox; S J Imm; K Carroll; A S Turk
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Coil type does not affect angiographic follow-up outcomes of cerebral aneurysm coiling: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  I Rezek; G Mousan; Z Wang; M H Murad; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Endovascular treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy (JR-NET) 1 and 2.

Authors:  Hirotoshi Imamura; Nobuyuki Sakai; Chiaki Sakai; Toshiyuki Fujinaka; Akira Ishii
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 1.742

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.