Literature DB >> 21498309

The CT flare response of metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer.

Christina Messiou1, Gary Cook, Alison H M Reid, Gerhardt Attard, David Dearnaley, Johann S de Bono, Nandita M de Souza.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New or worsening bone lesions in patients responding to treatment, known as the flare phenomenon is well described on (99m)Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy, but to our knowledge has not previously been described on CT. The appearance of new or worsening bone sclerosis on CT in patients with prostate cancer may therefore be erroneously classified as disease progression.
PURPOSE: To assess the incidence of osteoblastic healing flare response at 3-month CT assessment in patients with castrate-resistant prostate cancer and to identify associated features that enable differentiation from progressive metastatic bone disease at 3 months.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: CT scans of 67 patients with castrate-resistant prostate cancer undergoing treatment were reviewed by a radiologist blinded to clinical outcome. Changes in number, size, and density of metastatic bone lesions were documented and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) in soft tissue lesions, alkaline phosphatase, prostate specific antigen, and (99m)Tc-MDP bone scans were used for correlation.
RESULTS: Of the 39 patients who had 3- and 6-month follow-up, eight patients (21%) demonstrated an increase in number, size, or density of sclerotic lesions on the 3-month CT scan despite improvement in PSA and soft tissue lesions. Three out of eight patients (8%) maintained partial response/remained stable at follow-up and were defined as showing a flare response: in this group bone metastases evident on CT showed a qualitative and quantitative increase in density and no lesions faded at 3 months. In contrast, in all patients who progressed at 3 months by PSA/RECIST criteria (n = 8) bone lesions showed a mixed pattern with some lesions increasing and others decreasing in density.
CONCLUSION: The incidence of flare response of metastatic bone disease evident at 3-month post-treatment CT in patients with prostate cancer undergoing systemic treatment is 8%. In patients with falling PSA and stable/responding soft tissue disease at 3 months an increase in bone sclerosis in the absence of fading bone metastases can be interpreted as flare and is likely to represent a response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21498309     DOI: 10.1258/ar.2011.100342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  18 in total

1.  Case report of a rare giant bone island in a vertebral body combined with hemangioma.

Authors:  Qi Gou; Hui Huang; Yuecheng Wang; Rong Zeng; Daiying Zhou; Xuemei Huang; Dongmei Chen; Tao Ma; Qingshan Liu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.671

2.  Quantitative contrast-enhanced CT attenuation evaluation of osseous metastases following chemotherapy.

Authors:  Connie Y Chang; F Joseph Simeone; Martin Torriani; Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  A review of prostate cancer imaging, positron emission tomography, and radiopharmaceutical-based therapy.

Authors:  Amy Pawson; Zonia Ghumman; Phillip H Kuo; Hossein Jadvar; Twyla Bartel; Bobby Shayegan; Katherine Zukotynski
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  False-positive diagnosis of disease progression by magnetic resonance imaging for response assessment in prostate cancer with bone metastases: A case report and review of the pitfalls of images in the literature.

Authors:  Yi-Shan Yu; Wan-Hu Li; Ming-Huan Li; Xue Meng; L I Kong; Jin-Ming Yu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Flare on Serial Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT Examinations in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: First Observations.

Authors:  Katherine A Zukotynski; John Valliant; François Bénard; Steven P Rowe; Chun K Kim; Martin G Pomper; Steve Y Cho
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 7.794

Review 6.  [The role of PSMA PET-CT in patients with metastatic prostate cancer].

Authors:  J von Hardenberg; K-A Büsing; P Nuhn; M Ritter
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  [The role of PSMA PET-CT in patients with metastatic prostate cancer].

Authors:  J von Hardenberg; K-A Büsing; P Nuhn; M Ritter
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Use of apparent diffusion coefficient as a response biomarker in bone: effect of developing sclerosis on quantified values.

Authors:  C Messiou; D J Collins; V A Morgan; D Bianchini; J S de Bono; N M de Souza
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Performance of 18F-fluciclovine PET/MR in the evaluation of osseous metastases from castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gary J R Cook
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  A predictive model for pain response following radiotherapy for treatment of spinal metastases.

Authors:  Kohei Wakabayashi; Yutaro Koide; Takahiro Aoyama; Hidetoshi Shimizu; Risei Miyauchi; Hiroshi Tanaka; Hiroyuki Tachibana; Katsumasa Nakamura; Takeshi Kodaira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.