Literature DB >> 21498175

Veterinary opinions on refusing euthanasia: justifications and philosophical frameworks.

J W Yeates1, D C J Main.   

Abstract

To obtain information on euthanasia decisions from practising veterinary surgeons, respondents were asked to estimate how often during their time in practice they had refused to euthanase a dog and how often they had wanted to refuse to euthanase a dog but not done so because of other pressures. For each, respondents were then asked to state their most common reasons for refusing/not refusing in free text. The responses of clinicians were considered in the light of established ethical concepts to produce an evidence-based ethical framework for decision making. In total, 58 practitioners responded. Common reasons given for decisions on whether to refuse euthanasia referred to the patient's interests, such as the possibility of treatment or rehoming, and the fear of other unacceptable outcomes for the dog. Other reasons were based on concern for owners' interests. Some respondents reported being pressured into euthanasia by clients and other veterinary surgeons. This gives insight into the ethical principles that explicitly underlie veterinary surgeons' euthanasia decisions and the resultant framework may be useful for discussing and teaching euthanasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21498175     DOI: 10.1136/vr.c6352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Rec        ISSN: 0042-4900            Impact factor:   2.695


  17 in total

1.  Perpetration-induced traumatic stress - A risk for veterinarians involved in the destruction of healthy animals.

Authors:  Terry L Whiting; Colleen R Marion
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Expected consequences of convenience euthanasia perceived by veterinarians in Quebec.

Authors:  Dominick Rathwell-Deault; Béatrice Godard; Diane Frank; Béatrice Doizé
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Conceptualization of convenience euthanasia as an ethical dilemma for veterinarians in Quebec.

Authors:  Dominick Rathwell-Deault; Béatrice Godard; Diane Frank; Béatrice Doizé
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.008

4. 

Authors:  Dominick Rathwell-Deault; Béatrice Godard; Diane Frank; André Ravel; Béatrice Doizé
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.008

5.  'We wouldn't let a dog suffer like this'.

Authors:  Juliet Duncan; David Jeffrey
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Veterinarians' role for pet owners facing pet loss.

Authors:  P Fernandez-Mehler; P Gloor; E Sager; F I Lewis; T M Glaus
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 2.695

7.  Veterinarians' role in clients' decision-making regarding seriously ill companion animal patients.

Authors:  Stine Billeschou Christiansen; Annemarie Thuri Kristensen; Jesper Lassen; Peter Sandøe
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 1.695

8.  Attitudes of Austrian veterinarians towards euthanasia in small animal practice: impacts of age and gender on views on euthanasia.

Authors:  Sonja Hartnack; Svenja Springer; Marta Pittavino; Herwig Grimm
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Ethical challenges facing veterinary professionals in Ireland: results from Policy Delphi with vignette methodology.

Authors:  M Magalhães-Sant'Ana; S J More; D B Morton; A Hanlon
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.695

10.  Longevity and mortality in Kennel Club registered dog breeds in the UK in 2014.

Authors:  T W Lewis; B M Wiles; A M Llewellyn-Zaidi; K M Evans; D G O'Neill
Journal:  Canine Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.