BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Prior research has identified disparities in access to care, resource utilization, and outcomes in members of racial and ethnic minorities. However, the role that race/ethnicity may play in influencing outcomes after spine surgery has not been previously studied. PURPOSE: To characterize the effect of race and ethnicity on outcome after spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. PATIENT SAMPLE: Of 11 investigations selected in the initial analysis, four reported results in a fashion that enabled their inclusion in the meta-analysis. These four studies included a total of 128,635 patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: "Favorable" or "unfavorable" postsurgical outcomes were determined based on parameters described in each included investigation. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to identify all studies documenting outcomes, complications, or mortality after spine surgical procedures. Eligible studies had to include raw data that enabled separate analysis of white and nonwhite patients. Outcome was categorized as "favorable" or "unfavorable" based on scales included in each investigation. The Q-statistic was used to determine heterogeneity, and a meta-analysis was performed to assess the relative risk for unfavorable outcome among nonwhite patients after spine surgery. RESULTS: Eleven studies met initial selection criteria but only four were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis included 128,635 patients among whom 12,194 (9.5%) had unfavorable outcomes. Among white patients, 9.4% sustained an unfavorable outcome as compared with 10.4% of nonwhites. CONCLUSIONS: In light of the small number of studies able to be included in the meta-analysis, no firm conclusions can be drawn regarding the effect of race/ethnicity on outcome after spinal surgery. There is a pressing need for more robust research regarding spine surgical outcomes among different racial and ethnic minority groups. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Prior research has identified disparities in access to care, resource utilization, and outcomes in members of racial and ethnic minorities. However, the role that race/ethnicity may play in influencing outcomes after spine surgery has not been previously studied. PURPOSE: To characterize the effect of race and ethnicity on outcome after spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. PATIENT SAMPLE: Of 11 investigations selected in the initial analysis, four reported results in a fashion that enabled their inclusion in the meta-analysis. These four studies included a total of 128,635 patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: "Favorable" or "unfavorable" postsurgical outcomes were determined based on parameters described in each included investigation. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to identify all studies documenting outcomes, complications, or mortality after spine surgical procedures. Eligible studies had to include raw data that enabled separate analysis of white and nonwhite patients. Outcome was categorized as "favorable" or "unfavorable" based on scales included in each investigation. The Q-statistic was used to determine heterogeneity, and a meta-analysis was performed to assess the relative risk for unfavorable outcome among nonwhite patients after spine surgery. RESULTS: Eleven studies met initial selection criteria but only four were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis included 128,635 patients among whom 12,194 (9.5%) had unfavorable outcomes. Among white patients, 9.4% sustained an unfavorable outcome as compared with 10.4% of nonwhites. CONCLUSIONS: In light of the small number of studies able to be included in the meta-analysis, no firm conclusions can be drawn regarding the effect of race/ethnicity on outcome after spinal surgery. There is a pressing need for more robust research regarding spine surgical outcomes among different racial and ethnic minority groups. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Angel M Reyes; Jeffrey N Katz; Andrew J Schoenfeld; James D Kang; Elena Losina; Yuchiao Chang Journal: Spine J Date: 2020-11-20 Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: Harrison A Volaski; Zachary T Sharfman; Priyam Shah; Ananth Eleswarapu; David S Geller; Jonathan Krystal Journal: N Am Spine Soc J Date: 2022-09-15