Literature DB >> 21497296

Avoiding pitfalls in molecular genetic testing: case studies of high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization testing in the definitive diagnosis of Mowat-Wilson syndrome.

Michael Joseph Kluk1, Yu An, Philip James, David Coulter, David Harris, Bai-Lin Wu, Yiping Shen.   

Abstract

The molecular testing options available for the diagnosis of genetic disorders are numerous and include a variety of different assay platforms. The consultative input of molecular pathologists and cytogeneticists, working closely with the ordering clinicians, is often important for definitive diagnosis. Herein, we describe two patients who had long histories of unexplained signs and symptoms with a high clinical suspicion of an underlying genetic etiology. Initial molecular testing in both cases was negative, but the application of high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization technology lead to definitive diagnosis in both cases. We summarize the clinical findings and molecular testing in each case, discuss the differential diagnoses, and review the clinical and pathological findings of Mowat-Wilson syndrome. This report highlights the importance for those involved in molecular testing to know the nature of the underlying genetic abnormalities associated with the suspected diagnosis, to recognize the limitations of each testing platform, and to persistently pursue repeat testing using high-resolution technologies when indicated. This concept is applicable to both germline and somatic molecular genetic testing.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21497296      PMCID: PMC3077740          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2011.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  20 in total

Review 1.  Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S C Hillman; S Pretlove; A Coomarasamy; D J McMullan; E V Davison; E R Maher; M D Kilby
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 2.  Comparative genomic hybridization array study and its utility in detection of constitutional and acquired anomalies.

Authors:  Joris Andrieux; Frenny Sheth
Journal:  Indian J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 0.818

3.  ZFHX1B mutations in patients with Mowat-Wilson syndrome.

Authors:  Florence Dastot-Le Moal; Meredith Wilson; David Mowat; Nathalie Collot; Florence Niel; Michel Goossens
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 4.  Use of array CGH in the evaluation of dysmorphology, malformations, developmental delay, and idiopathic mental retardation.

Authors:  Pawel Stankiewicz; Arthur L Beaudet
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 5.  Mowat-Wilson syndrome: facial phenotype changing with age: study of 19 Italian patients and review of the literature.

Authors:  L Garavelli; M Zollino; P Cerruti Mainardi; F Gurrieri; F Rivieri; F Soli; R Verri; E Albertini; E Favaron; M Zignani; D Orteschi; P Bianchi; F Faravelli; F Forzano; M Seri; A Wischmeijer; D Turchetti; E Pompilii; M Gnoli; G Cocchi; L Mazzanti; R Bergamaschi; D De Brasi; M P Sperandeo; F Mari; V Uliana; R Mostardini; M Cecconi; M Grasso; S Sassi; G Sebastio; A Renieri; M Silengo; S Bernasconi; N Wakamatsu; G Neri
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 6.  Clinical utility of array CGH for the detection of chromosomal imbalances associated with mental retardation and multiple congenital anomalies.

Authors:  Lisa Edelmann; Kurt Hirschhorn
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Comprehensive ZEB2 gene analysis for Mowat-Wilson syndrome in a North American cohort: a suggested approach to molecular diagnostics.

Authors:  Carol J Saunders; Weiwei Zhao; Holly H Ardinger
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Array analysis and karyotyping: workflow consequences based on a retrospective study of 36,325 patients with idiopathic developmental delay in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Ron Hochstenbach; Ellen van Binsbergen; John Engelen; Aggie Nieuwint; Abeltje Polstra; Pino Poddighe; Claudia Ruivenkamp; Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz; Dominique Smeets; Martin Poot
Journal:  Eur J Med Genet       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 9.  Array CGH in patients with learning disability (mental retardation) and congenital anomalies: updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 studies and 13,926 subjects.

Authors:  Gurdeep S Sagoo; Adam S Butterworth; Simon Sanderson; Charles Shaw-Smith; Julian P T Higgins; Hilary Burton
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  Mowat-Wilson syndrome.

Authors:  Livia Garavelli; Paola Cerruti Mainardi
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 4.123

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Hirschsprung's disease in children with Mowat-Wilson syndrome.

Authors:  David Coyle; Prem Puri
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 2.  A novel interstitial deletion of chromosome 2q21.1-q23.3: Case report and literature review.

Authors:  Bader Almuzzaini; Nasser S Alatwi; Saif Alsaif; Mohammed A Al Balwi
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.183

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.