Literature DB >> 21497203

Is individual nasal sensitivity related to cellular metabolism of formaldehyde and susceptibility towards formaldehyde-induced genotoxicity?

Jasmin Zeller1, Alexandra Ulrich, Joerg U Mueller, Clarissa Riegert, Simone Neuss, Thomas Bruckner, Gerhard Triebig, Günter Speit.   

Abstract

Forty-one volunteers (male non-smokers, aged 32 ± 9.6yrs) were tested for susceptibility towards unspecific nasal irritation (sensitivity towards CO(2)) in order to define subgroups of hypersensitive and hyposensitive subjects. Blood samples were taken and the expression (mRNA level) of the GSH-dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase gene (FDH, identical to alcohol dehydrogenase 5, ADH5; EC 1.2.1.46) was measured in leukocytes by quantitative real-time RT-PCR with TaqMan probes. FDH is the most important enzyme for the metabolic inactivation of FA. Blood samples were exposed to 150μM formaldehyde (FA) for 2h and the induction of DNA-protein crosslinks (DPX) in leukocytes was measured by means of a modification of the alkaline comet assay (i.e., by assessing the reduction of DNA migration induced by γ-radiation). Removal of DPX was determined by the abolition of FA-induced reduction in DNA migration within 4h after the end of the exposure. Furthermore, the induction of sister chromatid exchange (SCE) in cultured lymphocytes was studied after treatment of whole blood cultures with FA (150μM). A correlation analysis was performed for all parameters tested for the whole study group and for hypersensitive and hyposensitive subgroups. The results indicate that despite large differences in CO(2)-sensitivity, the susceptibility towards nasal irritation was not related to the induction of genotoxic effects (DPX, SCE) in peripheral blood or to the protection of blood cells against FA-induced effects (expression of FDH, repair capacity for FA-induced DPX). There was no correlation between CO(2)-sensitivity and the expression of FDH. There was also no close correlation between the various indicators of cellular sensitivity towards FA-induced genotoxic effects and no subgroups were identified with particular mutagen sensitivity towards FA.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21497203     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2011.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  4 in total

1.  Exposure study to examine chemosensory effects of formaldehyde on hyposensitive and hypersensitive males.

Authors:  Joerg U Mueller; Thomas Bruckner; Gerhard Triebig
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 2.  Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens.

Authors:  Andrea Hartwig; Michael Arand; Bernd Epe; Sabine Guth; Gunnar Jahnke; Alfonso Lampen; Hans-Jörg Martus; Bernhard Monien; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Simone Schmitz-Spanke; Gerlinde Schriever-Schwemmer; Pablo Steinberg; Gerhard Eisenbrand
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 3.  Recent trend in risk assessment of formaldehyde exposures from indoor air.

Authors:  Gunnar Damgård Nielsen; Søren Thor Larsen; Peder Wolkoff
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.153

4.  New results on formaldehyde: the 2nd International Formaldehyde Science Conference (Madrid, 19-20 April 2012).

Authors:  Hermann M Bolt; Peter Morfeld
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 5.153

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.