OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between objective measures of the built environment (BE) and recreational physical activity (PA) in adults from Curitiba, Brazil. METHOD: A phone survey was carried among a random sample of 1206 people. Walking during leisure time (WLT) and moderate and vigorous recreational PA (MVPA) was measured using IPAQ. Characteristics of the BE were determined in an area of 500 m surrounding respondent's homes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the associations between recreational PA and BE. RESULTS: After adjusting for confounders, WLT was associated with area income level US$971.45-3341.64 vs. US$167.05-461.06 (25.7% vs. 11.1% POR=2.5; 95% CI=1.5-4.4), having ≥ 2 gyms vs. none (26.1% vs. 12.7%, POR=1.9; 95% CI=1.2-3.0) and distance to recreation centers, 1769.1-2835.5 km vs. 2835.6-10,212.3 km (22.1% vs. 11.0%, POR=2.3; 95% CI=(1.0-2.5). MVPA was associated with neighborhood income US$971.45-3341.64 vs. US$167.05-461.06 (47.6% vs. 22.0% POR=3.0; 95% CI=1.5-5.9) and having ≥ 2 gyms vs. none (41.7% vs. 26.0%, POR=1.5; 95% CI=1.11-2.1). CONCLUSION: The presence of some recreational facilities for PA was associated with recommended levels of PA during leisure time in Curitiba, Brazil.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between objective measures of the built environment (BE) and recreational physical activity (PA) in adults from Curitiba, Brazil. METHOD: A phone survey was carried among a random sample of 1206 people. Walking during leisure time (WLT) and moderate and vigorous recreational PA (MVPA) was measured using IPAQ. Characteristics of the BE were determined in an area of 500 m surrounding respondent's homes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the associations between recreational PA and BE. RESULTS: After adjusting for confounders, WLT was associated with area income level US$971.45-3341.64 vs. US$167.05-461.06 (25.7% vs. 11.1% POR=2.5; 95% CI=1.5-4.4), having ≥ 2 gyms vs. none (26.1% vs. 12.7%, POR=1.9; 95% CI=1.2-3.0) and distance to recreation centers, 1769.1-2835.5 km vs. 2835.6-10,212.3 km (22.1% vs. 11.0%, POR=2.3; 95% CI=(1.0-2.5). MVPA was associated with neighborhood income US$971.45-3341.64 vs. US$167.05-461.06 (47.6% vs. 22.0% POR=3.0; 95% CI=1.5-5.9) and having ≥ 2 gyms vs. none (41.7% vs. 26.0%, POR=1.5; 95% CI=1.11-2.1). CONCLUSION: The presence of some recreational facilities for PA was associated with recommended levels of PA during leisure time in Curitiba, Brazil.
Authors: Pablo D Lemoine; Olga L Sarmiento; Jose David Pinzón; Jose D Meisel; Felipe Montes; Dario Hidalgo; Michael Pratt; Juan Manuel Zambrano; Juan Manuel Cordovez; Roberto Zarama Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Deborah Salvo; Olga L Sarmiento; Rodrigo S Reis; Adriano A F Hino; Manuel A Bolivar; Pablo D Lemoine; Priscilla B Gonçalves; Michael Pratt Journal: Prev Med Date: 2016-09-05 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Ester Cerin; Kelli L Cain; Terry L Conway; Delfien Van Dyck; Erica Hinckson; Jasper Schipperijn; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Neville Owen; Rachel C Davey; Adriano Akira Ferreira Hino; Josef Mitáš; Rosario Orzanco-Garralda; Deborah Salvo; Olga L Sarmiento; Lars B Christiansen; Duncan J Macfarlane; Grant Schofield; James F Sallis Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 5.411