Literature DB >> 21496847

Delay of surgery in men with low risk prostate cancer.

Daniel O'Brien1, Stacy Loeb, Gustavo F Carvalhal, Barry B McGuire, Donghui Kan, Matthias D Hofer, Jessica T Casey, Brian T Helfand, William J Catalona.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Treatment options for patients with low risk prostate cancer include radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, and active surveillance. Among patients treated with radical prostatectomy, prior studies have demonstrated significantly higher biochemical progression rates with surgical delays of 6 months or greater. We determined the impact of surgical delay on radical prostatectomy outcomes specifically in low risk patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From our radical prostatectomy database we identified men who fulfilled the D'Amico low risk criteria (clinical stage T1c/T2a, prostate specific antigen less than 10 ng/ml, and biopsy Gleason 6 or less). Pathological tumor features and biochemical progression rates were compared between men with and without surgical delay. We used Cox proportional hazards models to examine predictors of biochemical progression.
RESULTS: Of 1,111 men who fulfilled the D'Amico low risk criteria, those with a surgical delay of 6 months or more were significantly older, had a higher proportion of African American men, and a lower proportion of clinical stage T2a (vs T1). A surgical delay of 6 months or more was associated with a greater risk of high grade disease at prostatectomy (p = 0.001) and biochemical progression (p = 0.04). The progression-free survival rate was significantly lower among men with a surgical delay. On multivariate analysis with prostate specific antigen and clinical stage, surgical delays of 6 months or more were significantly and independently associated with time to biochemical progression.
CONCLUSIONS: In men who met the D'Amico low risk criteria, a surgical delay of 6 months or more was associated with significantly worse radical prostatectomy outcomes, including more pathology upgrading and a higher rate of biochemical progression. Low risk patients choosing to defer initial definitive therapy should be counseled regarding the possibility of worse treatment outcomes at a later date.
Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21496847     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  31 in total

1.  Prostate cancer outcomes and delays in care.

Authors:  Michael E O'Callaghan; Zumin Shi; Tina Kopsaftis; Kim Moretti
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Surveillance biopsy and active treatment during active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Katsuyoshi Hashine; Hiroyuki Iio; Yoshiteru Ueno; Shohei Tsukimori; Iku Ninomiya
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Characteristics of modern Gleason 9/10 prostate adenocarcinoma: a single tertiary centre experience within the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  F O'Kelly; S Elamin; A Cahill; P Aherne; J White; J Buckley; K N O'Regan; A Brady; D G Power; M F O'Brien; P Sweeney; N Mayer; P J Kelly
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Robotic prostatectomy and access to care: Canadian vs. U.S. experience.

Authors:  Kevin C Zorn; Marc Zanaty; Assaad El-Hakim
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Prostate cancer radiomics and the promise of radiogenomics.

Authors:  Radka Stoyanova; Mandeep Takhar; Yohann Tschudi; John C Ford; Gabriel Solórzano; Nicholas Erho; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Sanoj Punnen; Elai Davicioni; Robert J Gillies; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.241

6.  Optimizing Time to Treatment to Achieve Durable Biochemical Disease Control after Surgery in Prostate Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Cohort Study.

Authors:  Shivanshu Awasthi; Travis Gerke; Jong Y Park; Francis A Asamoah; Vonetta L Williams; Angelina K Fink; Rajesh Balkrishnan; David I Lee; S Bruce Malkowicz; Priti Lal; Jasreman Dhillon; Julio M Pow-Sang; Timothy R Rebbeck; Kosj Yamoah
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Does time interval between prostate biopsy and surgery affect outcomes of radical prostatectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie Li; Qing Jiang; Qiubo Li; Yuanfeng Zhang; Liang Gao
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Time between diagnosis and surgical treatment on pathological and clinical outcomes in prostate cancer: does it matter?

Authors:  Mariana Andozia Morini; Roberto Lodeiro Muller; Paulo César Barbosa de Castro Junior; Rafael José de Souza; Eliney Ferreira Faria
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Timing of curative treatment for prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Roderick C N van den Bergh; Peter C Albertsen; Chris H Bangma; Stephen J Freedland; Markus Graefen; Andrew Vickers; Henk G van der Poel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Immediate versus delayed prostatectomy: Nationwide population-based study (.).

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Yasin Folkvaljon; David Robinson; Danil V Makarov; Ola Bratt; Hans Garmo; Pär Stattin
Journal:  Scand J Urol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 1.612

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.