PURPOSE: National Comprehensive Cancer Network practice guidelines indicate that pelvic lymph node dissection can be omitted at radical cystectomy in elderly patients. We examined the pelvic lymph node dissection rate in patients 80 years old or older and the impact of pelvic lymph node dissection on cancer specific and overall mortality in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined the records of 11,183 patients treated with radical cystectomy in 17 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registries. We performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis to test the effect of pelvic lymph node dissection on cancer specific and overall mortality. RESULTS: Overall pelvic lymph node dissection was omitted in 25% of patients, including 24.2% younger than 80 years and 30.8% 80 years old or older (p <0.001). The 5-year rate of freedom from cancer specific mortality for pelvic lymph node dissection vs no pelvic lymph node dissection was 62.5% vs 59.9% in patients younger than 80 years, and 50.0% vs 46.1% in those 80 years old or older (p = 0.01 and 0.005, respectively). The 5-year rate of freedom from overall mortality for the same categories was 48.8% vs 43.9% and 28.3% vs 24.7% (p <0.001 and 0.01, respectively). On multivariate analysis omitting pelvic lymph node dissection was associated with a 1.3-fold higher cancer specific rate at ages less than 80 and 80 years or greater (each p <0.001). Omitting pelvic lymph node dissection was also associated with a 1.3-fold higher overall mortality rate, including 1.3 at ages less than 80 years and 1.2-fold at ages 80 years or greater (each p ≤0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that pelvic lymph node dissection was more often omitted in patients 80 years old or older than in those younger than 80 years. However, the protective effect of pelvic lymph node dissection on cancer specific and overall mortality was virtually the same in the 2 age categories. Thus, advanced age should not be a limiting factor for performing pelvic lymph node dissection at radical cystectomy.
PURPOSE: National Comprehensive Cancer Network practice guidelines indicate that pelvic lymph node dissection can be omitted at radical cystectomy in elderly patients. We examined the pelvic lymph node dissection rate in patients 80 years old or older and the impact of pelvic lymph node dissection on cancer specific and overall mortality in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined the records of 11,183 patients treated with radical cystectomy in 17 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registries. We performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis to test the effect of pelvic lymph node dissection on cancer specific and overall mortality. RESULTS: Overall pelvic lymph node dissection was omitted in 25% of patients, including 24.2% younger than 80 years and 30.8% 80 years old or older (p <0.001). The 5-year rate of freedom from cancer specific mortality for pelvic lymph node dissection vs no pelvic lymph node dissection was 62.5% vs 59.9% in patients younger than 80 years, and 50.0% vs 46.1% in those 80 years old or older (p = 0.01 and 0.005, respectively). The 5-year rate of freedom from overall mortality for the same categories was 48.8% vs 43.9% and 28.3% vs 24.7% (p <0.001 and 0.01, respectively). On multivariate analysis omitting pelvic lymph node dissection was associated with a 1.3-fold higher cancer specific rate at ages less than 80 and 80 years or greater (each p <0.001). Omitting pelvic lymph node dissection was also associated with a 1.3-fold higher overall mortality rate, including 1.3 at ages less than 80 years and 1.2-fold at ages 80 years or greater (each p ≤0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that pelvic lymph node dissection was more often omitted in patients 80 years old or older than in those younger than 80 years. However, the protective effect of pelvic lymph node dissection on cancer specific and overall mortality was virtually the same in the 2 age categories. Thus, advanced age should not be a limiting factor for performing pelvic lymph node dissection at radical cystectomy.
Authors: M May; C Protzel; M W Vetterlein; M Gierth; J Noldus; A Karl; T Grimm; B Wullich; M O Grimm; P Nuhn; P J Bastian; J Roigas; B Hadaschik; C Gilfrich; M Burger; M Fisch; S Brookman-May; A Aziz; O W Hakenberg Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2016-11-28 Impact factor: 2.370