Literature DB >> 21496160

Comparison of chronic biphasic pacing versus cathodal pacing of the right ventricle on left ventricular function in sheep after myocardial infarction.

Morton M Mower1, Dennis Hepp, Ralph Hall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The physiological effects of biphasic pacing have not been studied in compromised hearts.
METHODS: Myocardial infarction was induced in 12 sheep by high coronary artery ligation. Perioperative mortality was 33%. The surviving eight animals exhibited increased left ventricular volume and reduced percent fractional shortening. Two weeks after the infarction, sheep were implanted with atrial-triggered, right ventricular pacemaker systems capable of pacing with cathodal (cathodal pulse) and biphasic (anodal pulse followed by cathodal pulse) waveforms, and randomly assigned to an initial mode. At 3-month intervals, or whenever pacing was lost for any reason, the pacing system was switched to the alternative mode. Cardiac function was assessed at 2- to 3-week intervals through the use of echocardiograms. Successful pacing was confirmed over an average of 8 weeks in each mode.
RESULTS: Cathodal pulsing had neither beneficial nor deleterious effect on the diminished cardiac performance induced by myocardial infarction. When compared to the cathodal mode, biphasic pulsing improved cardiac performance as reflected by decrease of diastolic and systolic ventricular volumes, reduction in left ventricular systolic diameter, and increases in percent fractional shortening. When compared to the unpaced state after the myocardial infarction, the percent fractional shortening was significantly increased by biphasic pacing. Concordant trends in improvement in the other cardiac parameters were also observed for the biphasic mode. No ventricular tachyarrhythmias or mortality was associated with biphasic stimulation.
CONCLUSION: When compared to cathodal pacing, myocardial biphasic pacing has no safety issues in sheep that have undergone a large myocardial infarction. Importantly, biphasic pulsing elicited significant benefits in cardiac performance. ©2011, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21496160      PMCID: PMC6932136          DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2011.00430.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol        ISSN: 1082-720X            Impact factor:   1.468


  3 in total

1.  Biventricular pacing in end-stage heart failure improves functional capacity and left ventricular function.

Authors:  P F Bakker; H W Meijburg; J W de Vries; M M Mower; A C Thomas; M L Hull; E O Robles De Medina; J J Bredée
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Multiple chambered pacing for treatment of congestive heart failure.

Authors:  A C Thomas; M M Mower
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Effect of varying pacing waveform shapes on propagation and hemodynamics in the rabbit heart.

Authors:  N V Thakor; R Ranjan; S Rajasekhar; M M Mower
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1997-03-20       Impact factor: 2.778

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Paced monophasic and biphasic waveforms alter transmembrane potentials and metabolism of human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Sean F O'Hearn; Bethany J Ackerman; Morton M Mower
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep       Date:  2016-09-23

2.  A novel computational sheep atria model for the study of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Timothy D Butters; Oleg V Aslanidi; Jichao Zhao; Bruce Smaill; Henggui Zhang
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 3.906

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.