BACKGROUND: There are widespread assumptions that a large proportion of American adults use a variety of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies. The goal of this study is to explore the clustering or linkages among CAM categories in the general population. Linkset analysis and data from the 2002 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) were used to address two specific aims. First, the dominant linkages of CAM categories used by the same individual were delineated, and population estimates were generated of the percentage of American adults using different linksets of CAM categories. Second, it was determined whether dominant linkages of CAM modalities differ by age, gender, ethnicity, and education. METHODS: Linkset analysis, a method of estimating co-occurrence beyond chance, was used on data from the 2002 NHIS (N = 29,862) to identify possible sets of CAM use. RESULTS: Most adults use CAM therapies from a single category. Approximately 20% of adults combined two CAM categories, with the combination of mind-body therapies and biologically based therapies estimated to be most common. Only 5% of adults use therapies representing three or more CAM categories. Combining therapies across multiple CAM categories was more common among those 46-64, women, whites, and those with a college education. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study allow researchers to refine descriptions of CAM use in the adult population. Most adults do not use a wide assortment of CAM; most use therapies within a single CAM category. Sets of CAM use were found to differ by age, gender, ethnicity, and education in ways consistent with previous research.
BACKGROUND: There are widespread assumptions that a large proportion of American adults use a variety of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies. The goal of this study is to explore the clustering or linkages among CAM categories in the general population. Linkset analysis and data from the 2002 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) were used to address two specific aims. First, the dominant linkages of CAM categories used by the same individual were delineated, and population estimates were generated of the percentage of American adults using different linksets of CAM categories. Second, it was determined whether dominant linkages of CAM modalities differ by age, gender, ethnicity, and education. METHODS: Linkset analysis, a method of estimating co-occurrence beyond chance, was used on data from the 2002 NHIS (N = 29,862) to identify possible sets of CAM use. RESULTS: Most adults use CAM therapies from a single category. Approximately 20% of adults combined two CAM categories, with the combination of mind-body therapies and biologically based therapies estimated to be most common. Only 5% of adults use therapies representing three or more CAM categories. Combining therapies across multiple CAM categories was more common among those 46-64, women, whites, and those with a college education. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study allow researchers to refine descriptions of CAM use in the adult population. Most adults do not use a wide assortment of CAM; most use therapies within a single CAM category. Sets of CAM use were found to differ by age, gender, ethnicity, and education in ways consistent with previous research.
Authors: Joseph G Grzywacz; Thomas A Arcury; Ronny A Bell; Wei Lang; Cynthia K Suerken; Shannon L Smith; Sara A Quandt Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2006 Jan-Feb
Authors: Thomas A Arcury; Joseph G Grzywacz; Ronny A Bell; Rebecca H Neiberg; Wei Lang; Sara A Quandt Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Thomas A Arcury; Joseph G Grzywacz; Eleanor P Stoller; Ronny A Bell; Kathryn P Altizer; Christine Chapman; Sara A Quandt Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2009-03-13 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Thomas A Arcury; Cynthia K Suerken; Joseph G Grzywacz; Ronny A Bell; Wei Lang; Sara A Quandt Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2006 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Joseph G Grzywacz; Rebecca Neiberg; Sara A Quandt; Wei Lang; Ronny A Bell; Thomas A Arcury Journal: Complement Ther Med Date: 2011-11-03 Impact factor: 2.446
Authors: Emily M Agree; Abby C King; Cynthia M Castro; Adrienne Wiley; Dina L G Borzekowski Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-03-24 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Mayilee Canizares; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Monique A M Gignac; Richard H Glazier; Elizabeth M Badley Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rod P Bonello; Marc Cohen; John Reece; Arun Aggarwal; Curtis Rigney Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2014-06-05 Impact factor: 2.629
Authors: Garrett Strizich; Marilie D Gammon; Judith S Jacobson; Melanie Wall; Page Abrahamson; Patrick T Bradshaw; Mary Beth Terry; Susan Teitelbaum; Alfred I Neugut; Heather Greenlee Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med Date: 2015-11-19 Impact factor: 3.659