Eugene A Kiyatkin1, Magalie Lenoir. 1. Behavioral Neuroscience Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, 333 Cassell Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA. ekiyatki@intra.nida.nih.gov
Abstract
RATIONALE: Addictive drugs are commonly delivered in the organism by means of intravenous (i.v.) injections. Since saline mimics the blood environment by basic ionic properties and pH, it is generally assumed that it should not have any physiological effects, serving as a control for the effects induced by drugs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine central, behavioral, and physiological effects of stress- and cue-free i.v. saline injection in freely moving rats. METHODS: We examined how a typical low-volume and slow-speed saline injections affect cortical electroencephalograpy (EEG), neck electromyography (EMG), locomotor activity as well as central and peripheral temperatures. RESULTS: Saline injection made during slow-wave synchronized activity induces rapid transient EEG desynchronization, manifesting as a drop of EEG total power, decrease in alpha activity, and increases in beta and gamma activities. Saline injection did not affect locomotor activity as well as brain and body temperatures, but induced a transient increase in neck EMG activity and a rapid brief drop in skin temperature, suggesting peripheral vasoconstriction. These responses were virtually fully absent when saline injection was made during naturally occurring desynchronized EEG activity during behavioral activity. CONCLUSIONS: Since i.v. injection is able to produce a peripheral sensory signal that is transmitted rapidly to the CNS and followed by a more prolonged effect of the injected drug on brain cells, with repeated drug administrations, the injection itself could play a role of drug-related sensory cue, thus inducing conditioned physiological responses and altering the effects of injected drugs.
RATIONALE: Addictive drugs are commonly delivered in the organism by means of intravenous (i.v.) injections. Since saline mimics the blood environment by basic ionic properties and pH, it is generally assumed that it should not have any physiological effects, serving as a control for the effects induced by drugs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine central, behavioral, and physiological effects of stress- and cue-free i.v. saline injection in freely moving rats. METHODS: We examined how a typical low-volume and slow-speed saline injections affect cortical electroencephalograpy (EEG), neck electromyography (EMG), locomotor activity as well as central and peripheral temperatures. RESULTS:Saline injection made during slow-wave synchronized activity induces rapid transient EEG desynchronization, manifesting as a drop of EEG total power, decrease in alpha activity, and increases in beta and gamma activities. Saline injection did not affect locomotor activity as well as brain and body temperatures, but induced a transient increase in neck EMG activity and a rapid brief drop in skin temperature, suggesting peripheral vasoconstriction. These responses were virtually fully absent when saline injection was made during naturally occurring desynchronized EEG activity during behavioral activity. CONCLUSIONS: Since i.v. injection is able to produce a peripheral sensory signal that is transmitted rapidly to the CNS and followed by a more prolonged effect of the injected drug on brain cells, with repeated drug administrations, the injection itself could play a role of drug-related sensory cue, thus inducing conditioned physiological responses and altering the effects of injected drugs.
Authors: H Sasaki; P Coffey; M P Villegas-Perez; M Vidal-Sanz; M J Young; R D Lund; Y Fukuda Journal: Neurosci Lett Date: 1996-10-25 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Anne-Noël Samaha; Nicolas Mallet; Susan M Ferguson; François Gonon; Terry E Robinson Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2004-07-14 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Hanbing Lu; Svetlana Chefer; Pradeep K Kurup; Karine Guillem; D Bruce Vaupel; Thomas J Ross; Anna Moore; Yihong Yang; Laura L Peoples; Elliot A Stein Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2012-06-01 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Bin Wang; Zhi-Bing You; Erik B Oleson; Joseph F Cheer; Stephanie Myal; Roy A Wise Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2013-03-27 Impact factor: 7.853