Literature DB >> 21494087

Indirect effects of tending ants on holm oak volatiles and acorn quality.

Carolina I Paris1, Joan Llusia, Josep Peñuelas.   

Abstract

The indirect effect of ants on plants through their mutualism with honeydew-producing insects has been extensively investigated. Honeydew-producing insects that are tended by ants impose a cost on plant fitness and health by reducing seed production and/or plant growth. This cost is associated with sap intake and virus transmissions but may be overcompesated by tending ants if they deter or prey on hebivorous insects. The balance between cost and benefits depends on the tending ant species. In this study we report other indirect effects on plants of the mutualism between aphids and ants. We have found that two Lasius ant species, one native and the other invasive, may change the composition of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of the holm oak (Quercus ilex) blend when they tend the aphid Lachnus roboris. The aphid regulation of its feeding and honeydew production according to the ant demands was proposed as a plausible mechanism that triggers changes in VOCs. Additionally, we now report here that aphid feeding, which is located most of the time on acorns cap or petiole, significantly increased the relative content of linolenic acid in acorns from holm oak colonized by the invasive ant. This acid is involved in the response of plants to insect herbivory as a precursor or jasmonic acid. No effect was found on acorn production, germination or seedlings quality. These results suggest that tending-ants may trigger the physiological response of holm oaks involved in plant resistance toward aphid herbivory and this response is ant species dependant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21494087      PMCID: PMC3142389          DOI: 10.4161/psb.6.4.14839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Signal Behav        ISSN: 1559-2316


  11 in total

Review 1.  Competitive displacement among insects and arachnids.

Authors:  Stuart R Reitz; John T Trumble
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Ungulate herbivory: indirect effects cascade into the treetops.

Authors:  Andrew J Larson; Robert T Paine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions.

Authors:  Martin Heil
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 4.  Plant-aphid interactions: molecular and ecological perspectives.

Authors:  Fiona L Goggin
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 7.834

5.  The importance of floral signals in the establishment of plant-ant mutualisms.

Authors:  Clara de Vega
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2009-06-24

6.  Indirect effects in community ecology: Their definition, study and importance.

Authors:  S Y Strauss
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 7.  Ecological consequences of interactions between ants and honeydew-producing insects.

Authors:  John D Styrsky; Micky D Eubanks
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Changes in monoterpene emission rates of Quercus ilex infested by aphids tended by native or invasive Lasius ant species.

Authors:  Carolina I Paris; Joan Llusia; Josep Peñuelas
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Direct and indirect effects of giant kelp determine benthic community structure and dynamics.

Authors:  Katie K Arkema; Daniel C Reed; Stephen C Schroeter
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.499

10.  Foliar methyl salicylate emissions indicate prolonged aphid infestation on silver birch and black alder.

Authors:  James D Blande; Minna Korjus; Jarmo K Holopainen
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 4.196

View more
  1 in total

1.  Ecological interactions shape the dynamics of seed predation in Acrocomia aculeata (Arecaceae).

Authors:  Anielle C F Pereira; Francine S A Fonseca; Gleicielle R Mota; Ane K C Fernandes; Marcílio Fagundes; Ronaldo Reis-Júnior; Maurício L Faria
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.