Literature DB >> 21493981

Evaluation of a subject-specific transfer-function-based nonlinear QT interval rate-correction method.

Vincent Jacquemet1, Bruno Dubé, Robin Knight, Réginald Nadeau, A Robert LeBlanc, Marcio Sturmer, Giuliano Becker, Alain Vinet, Teresa Kuś.   

Abstract

The QT interval in the electrocardiogram (ECG) is a measure of total duration of depolarization and repolarization. Correction for heart rate is necessary to provide a single intrinsic physiological value that can be compared between subjects and within the same subject under different conditions. Standard formulas for the corrected QT (QTc) do not fully reproduce the complexity of the dependence in the preceding interbeat intervals (RR) and inter-subject variability. In this paper, a subject-specific, nonlinear, transfer function-based correction method is formulated to compute the QTc from Holter ECG recordings. The model includes five parameters: three describing the static QT-RR relationship and two representing memory/hysteresis effects that intervene in the calculation of effective RR values. The parameter identification procedure is designed to minimize QTc fluctuations and enforce zero correlation between QTc and effective RR. Weighted regression is used to better handle unbalanced or skewed RR distributions. The proposed optimization approach provides a general mathematical framework for further extensions of the model. Validation, robustness evaluation and comparison with existing QT correction formulas is performed on ECG signals recorded during sinus rhythm, atrial pacing, tilt-table tests, stress tests and atrial flutter (29 subjects in total). The resulting average modeling error on the QTc is 4.9 ± 1.1 ms with a sampling interval of 2 ms, which outperforms correction formulas currently used. The results demonstrate the benefits of subject-specific rate correction and hysteresis reduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21493981     DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/32/6/001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  8 in total

Review 1.  Clinical applications of QT/RR hysteresis assessment: A systematic review.

Authors:  Hugo Gravel; Vincent Jacquemet; Nagib Dahdah; Daniel Curnier
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 2.  Categorization and theoretical comparison of quantitative methods for assessing QT/RR hysteresis.

Authors:  Hugo Gravel; Daniel Curnier; Nagib Dahdah; Vincent Jacquemet
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  QT/RR curvatures in healthy subjects: sex differences and covariates.

Authors:  Marek Malik; Katerina Hnatkova; Donna Kowalski; James J Keirns; E Marcel van Gelderen
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Universal Correction for QT/RR Hysteresis.

Authors:  Marek Malik; Lars Johannesen; Katerina Hnatkova; Norman Stockbridge
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  QT interval variability in body surface ECG: measurement, physiological basis, and clinical value: position statement and consensus guidance endorsed by the European Heart Rhythm Association jointly with the ESC Working Group on Cardiac Cellular Electrophysiology.

Authors:  Mathias Baumert; Alberto Porta; Marc A Vos; Marek Malik; Jean-Philippe Couderc; Pablo Laguna; Gianfranco Piccirillo; Godfrey L Smith; Larisa G Tereshchenko; Paul G A Volders
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.214

6.  Importance of QT/RR hysteresis correction in studies of drug-induced QTc interval changes.

Authors:  Marek Malik; Christine Garnett; Katerina Hnatkova; Lars Johannesen; Jose Vicente; Norman Stockbridge
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 2.745

7.  Physiologic heart rate dependency of the PQ interval and its sex differences.

Authors:  Ondřej Toman; Katerina Hnatkova; Peter Smetana; Katharina M Huster; Martina Šišáková; Petra Barthel; Tomáš Novotný; Georg Schmidt; Marek Malik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Sex and Rate Change Differences in QT/RR Hysteresis in Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Irena Andršová; Katerina Hnatkova; Martina Šišáková; Ondřej Toman; Peter Smetana; Katharina M Huster; Petra Barthel; Tomáš Novotný; Georg Schmidt; Marek Malik
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 4.566

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.