Literature DB >> 21493740

Icodextrin increases technique survival rate in peritoneal dialysis patients with diabetic nephropathy by improving body fluid management: a randomized controlled trial.

Yuji Takatori1, Shigeru Akagi, Hitoshi Sugiyama, Junko Inoue, Shoichiro Kojo, Hiroshi Morinaga, Kazushi Nakao, Jun Wada, Hirofumi Makino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are still controversies whether peritoneal dialysis (PD) with icodextrin preserves residual renal and peritoneal membrane functions in patients with diabetes. However, there are no randomized controlled and long-term clinical trials in newly started PD patients with diabetic nephropathy. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Forty-one patients with diabetic nephropathy with ESRD were enrolled and randomly assigned to the glucose group (GLU) treated with 8 L of 1.5% or 2.5% glucose or an icodextrin group (ICO) treated with 1.5 or 2.0 L of 7.5% icodextrin-containing solutions. Technique failure, body fluid management, glucose and lipid metabolism, and residual renal and peritoneal functions and were evaluated over 2 years.
RESULTS: The technique survival rate was 71.4% in ICO and 45.0% in GLU, with most of the technique failure due to volume overload. ICO showed significantly better cumulative technique survival. Net ultrafiltration volume was significantly higher in ICO throughout the study period. There were no beneficial effects of icodextrin on hemoglobin A1c, glycoalbumin, and lipid profile at 24 months. Urine volume and residual renal function declined faster in ICO, but there were no significant differences between the two groups. For peritoneal function, no differences were observed in dialysis-to-plasma creatinine ratios during the observation.
CONCLUSIONS: In PD therapy for diabetic nephropathy, the use of icodextrin-containing solutions has a beneficial effect on technique survival, but there are no apparent benefits or disadvantages in residual renal and peritoneal functions compared with conventional PD with glucose solution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21493740      PMCID: PMC3109930          DOI: 10.2215/CJN.10041110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  26 in total

Review 1.  Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis: a single-center experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Konstantina Trigka; Periklis Dousdampanis; Maggie Chu; Saimah Khan; Mufazzal Ahmad; Joanne M Bargman; Dimitrios G Oreopoulos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Peritoneal effluent markers of inflammation in patients treated with icodextrin-based and glucose-based dialysis solutions.

Authors:  Alena Parikova; Machteld M Zweers; Dirk G Struijk; Raymond T Krediet
Journal:  Adv Perit Dial       Date:  2003

3.  Effects of icodextrin on the peritoneal membrane.

Authors:  Raymond T Krediet
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 5.992

4.  A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of icodextrin in peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Marsha Wolfson; Beth Piraino; Richard J Hamburger; A Ross Morton
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  Influence of dialysate on gastric emptying time in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  VlemBrunoA Van; Renaat S Schoonjans; Dirk G Struijk; Johan J Verbanck; Raymond C Vanholder; BiesenWimV Van; Romain A Lefebvre; VosMartineP De; Norbert H Lameire
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 6.  Clinical value of standardized equilibration tests in CAPD patients.

Authors:  Z J Twardowski
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.614

7.  Icodextrin improves the fluid status of peritoneal dialysis patients: results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Simon J Davies; Graham Woodrow; Kieron Donovan; Jörg Plum; Paul Williams; Ann Catherine Johansson; Hans-Peter Bosselmann; Olof Heimbürger; Ole Simonsen; Andrew Davenport; Anders Tranaeus; Jose C Divino Filho
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 8.  Icodextrin: a review of its use in peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  James E Frampton; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Glycemic control in diabetic CAPD patients assessed by continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS).

Authors:  Jennifer Marshall; Peter Jennings; Adrian Scott; Richard J Fluck; Christopher W McIntyre
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 10.612

10.  Ultrafiltration with an isosmotic solution during long peritoneal dialysis exchanges.

Authors:  C D Mistry; N P Mallick; R Gokal
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-07-25       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  20 in total

1.  The Effect of Fluid Overload on Clinical Outcome in Southern Chinese Patients Undergoing Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis.

Authors:  Qunying Guo; Jianxiong Lin; Jianying Li; Chunyan Yi; Haiping Mao; Xiao Yang; Xueqing Yu
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 2.  Strategies for preventing peritoneal fibrosis in peritoneal dialysis patients: new insights based on peritoneal inflammation and angiogenesis.

Authors:  Zhen Zhang; Na Jiang; Zhaohui Ni
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  A Patient on Peritoneal Dialysis with Refractory Volume Overload.

Authors:  Martin Wilkie
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 4.  An update on peritoneal dialysis solutions.

Authors:  Elvia García-López; Bengt Lindholm; Simon Davies
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 5.  Advances in Understanding and Management of Residual Renal Function in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Chunsun Dai
Journal:  Kidney Dis (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-07

Review 6.  [Peritoneal dialysis from the beginnings up to today: which developments of the last decades were important?].

Authors:  Andreas Vychytil
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2013-04-17

7.  Outcomes of peritoneal dialysis patients and switching to hemodialysis: a competing risks analysis.

Authors:  Jernej Pajek; Alastair J Hutchison; Shiv Bhutani; Paul E C Brenchley; Helen Hurst; Maja Pohar Perme; Angela M Summers; Anand Vardhan
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  The peritoneal-renal syndrome.

Authors:  Sharon J Nessim; Joanne M Bargman
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 28.314

9.  Left ventricular hypertrophy and chronic fluid overload in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Rizna Abdul Cader; Osama Ali Ibrahim; Samir Paul; Halim Abdul Gafor; Rozita Mohd
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Randomized, controlled trial of glucose-sparing peritoneal dialysis in diabetic patients.

Authors:  Philip K T Li; Bruce F Culleton; Amaury Ariza; Jun-Young Do; David W Johnson; Mauricio Sanabria; Ty R Shockley; Ken Story; Andrey Vatazin; Mauro Verrelli; Alex W Yu; Joanne M Bargman
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 10.121

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.