Literature DB >> 21493013

Geographic analysis of the radiation oncology workforce.

Sanjay Aneja1, Benjamin D Smith, Cary P Gross, Lynn D Wilson, Bruce G Haffty, Kenneth Roberts, James B Yu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate trends in the geographic distribution of the radiation oncology (RO) workforce. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We used the 1995 and 2007 versions of the Area Resource File to map the ratio of RO to the population aged 65 years or older (ROR) within different health service areas (HSA) within the United States. We used regression analysis to find associations between population variables and 2007 ROR. We calculated Gini coefficients for ROR to assess the evenness of RO distribution and compared that with primary care physicians and total physicians.
RESULTS: There was a 24% increase in the RO workforce from 1995 to 2007. The overall growth in the RO workforce was less than that of primary care or the overall physician workforce. The mean ROR among HSAs increased by more than one radiation oncologist per 100,000 people aged 65 years or older, from 5.08 per 100,000 to 6.16 per 100,000. However, there remained consistent geographic variability concerning RO distribution, specifically affecting the non-metropolitan HSAs. Regression analysis found higher ROR in HSAs that possessed higher education (p = 0.001), higher income (p < 0.001), lower unemployment rates (p < 0.001), and higher minority population (p = 0.022). Gini coefficients showed RO distribution less even than for both primary care physicians and total physicians (0.326 compared with 0.196 and 0.292, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a modest growth in the RO workforce, there exists persistent geographic maldistribution of radiation oncologists allocated along socioeconomic and racial lines. To solve problems surrounding the RO workforce, issues concerning both gross numbers and geographic distribution must be addressed. Copyright Â
© 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21493013     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  17 in total

1.  The influence of regional health system characteristics on the surgical management and receipt of post operative radiation therapy for glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Sanjay Aneja; Dhruv Khullar; James B Yu
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Where do patients with cancer in Iowa receive radiation therapy?

Authors:  Marcia M Ward; Fred Ullrich; Kevin Matthews; Gerard Rushton; Roger Tracy; Michael A Goldstein; Dean F Bajorin; Michael P Kosty; Suanna S Bruinooge; Amy Hanley; Geraldine M Jacobson; Charles F Lynch
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  The Impact of Graduates' Job Preferences on the Current Radiation Oncology Job Market.

Authors:  Mudit Chowdhary; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Neilayan Sen; Arpit M Chhabra; Leah M Katz; Naresh K Jegadeesh; Parul N Barry; Dian Wang; Trevor J Royce; Walter J Curran; Neha Vapiwala; Lynn D Wilson; Ross A Abrams; Gaurav Marwaha; Kirtesh R Patel
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Domestic Job Shortage or Job Maldistribution? A Geographic Analysis of the Current Radiation Oncology Job Market.

Authors:  Mudit Chowdhary; Arpit M Chhabra; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Jaymin Jhaveri; Neilayan Sen; Pretesh R Patel; Walter J Curran; Ross A Abrams; Kirtesh R Patel; Gaurav Marwaha
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  A 15-Year Profile of U.S. Radiation Oncology Residency Growth by Geographic Region, Metropolitan Size, and Program Size.

Authors:  Mudit Chowdhary; Neilayan Sen; Gaurav Marwaha; Ashley A Weiner; Neha Vapiwala; Kirtesh R Patel; Trevor J Royce
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-11-26

6.  Definitive chemoradiation at high volume facilities is associated with improved survival in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Waqar Haque; Vivek Verma; E Brian Butler; Bin S Teh
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Variation in receipt of radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery: assessing the impact of physicians and geographic regions.

Authors:  Aaron J Feinstein; Pamela R Soulos; Jessica B Long; Jeph Herrin; Kenneth B Roberts; James B Yu; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Association Between Geographic Access to Cancer Care and Receipt of Radiation Therapy for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Chun Chieh Lin; Suanna S Bruinooge; M Kelsey Kirkwood; Dawn L Hershman; Ahmedin Jemal; B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; James B Yu; Shane Hopkins; Michael Goldstein; Dean Bajorin; Sharon H Giordano; Michael Kosty; Anna Arnone; Amy Hanley; Stephanie Stevens; Christine Olsen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  The Canadian Plastic Surgery Workforce Analysis: Forecasting Future Need.

Authors:  Alexander Morzycki; Helene Retrouvey; Becher Alhalabi; Johnny Ionut Efanov; Sarah Al-Youha; Jamil Ahmad; David T Tang
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 0.947

10.  Overall survival based on oncologist density in the United States: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sudeep K Siddappa Malleshappa; Smith Giri; Smit Patel; Tapan Mehta; Leonard Appleman; Scott F Huntington; Vida Passero; Rahul A Parikh; Kathan D Mehta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.