Literature DB >> 21492765

Effects of treatment on exercise tolerance, cardiac function, and mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. A meta-analysis.

David J Holland1, Dharam J Kumbhani, Salim H Ahmed, Thomas H Marwick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether pharmacologic interventions changed exercise capacity, diastolic function, and mortality in a meta-analysis of trials in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
BACKGROUND: Treatment strategies for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction remain unproven despite several large-scale trials.
METHODS: Trials were included in the systematic review where clear comparisons between trial drug and diuretic or placebo were available. Exercise tolerance was assessed by treadmill time, and changes in diastolic function were quantified by transmitral flow (E/A ratio). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Weighted mean differences (MDs) and relative risks (RRs), along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were computed using random-effects models for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. The impact of potential covariates was assessed by meta-regression.
RESULTS: Data from 53,878 patients enrolled in 30 published reports were collated, including 18 randomized controlled trials (n = 11,253) and 12 observational studies (n = 42,625). In the randomized controlled trials, exercise tolerance was improved by combined therapy (n = 183; weighted MD = 51.5; 95% CI: 27.3 to 75.7; p < 0.001), whereas E/A ratio was not (n = 472; weighted MD = -0.01, 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.02; p = 0.54) even after accounting for baseline E/A (p = 0.87). Over a mean follow-up of 18.6 months, all-cause mortality was not improved by therapy in randomized controlled trials (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.92 to 1.06; p = 0.70), despite accounting for baseline ejection fraction (p = 0.72). In observational reports, there was a reduction in all-cause mortality with therapy in the unadjusted analyses (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.97; p = 0.27), but not after adjustment for clinical and demographic data (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.02; p = 0.10).
CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacotherapy of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction demonstrates a quantifiable improvement in exercise tolerance but not mortality.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21492765     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.10.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  52 in total

Review 1.  Exercise training in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

Authors:  Ambarish Pandey; Akhil Parashar; Dharam Kumbhani; Sunil Agarwal; Jalaj Garg; Dalane Kitzman; Benjamin Levine; Mark Drazner; Jarett Berry
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 8.790

2.  Understanding results of trials in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: remembering forgotten lessons and enduring principles.

Authors:  Dalane W Kitzman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Phenotype-Specific Treatment of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Multiorgan Roadmap.

Authors:  Sanjiv J Shah; Dalane W Kitzman; Barry A Borlaug; Loek van Heerebeek; Michael R Zile; David A Kass; Walter J Paulus
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Sirtuin 3, Endothelial Metabolic Reprogramming, and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Heng Zeng; Jian-Xiong Chen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.105

5.  Characterization of heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction: a comparison between ADHERE-US registry and ADHERE-International registry.

Authors:  Ryenn West; Li Liang; Gregg C Fonarow; Robb Kociol; Roger M Mills; Christopher M O'Connor; Adrian F Hernandez
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 15.534

Review 6.  Comparing new onset heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and new onset heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: an epidemiologic perspective.

Authors:  Frank P Brouwers; Hans L Hillege; Wiek H van Gilst; Dirk J van Veldhuisen
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2012-12

Review 7.  Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in the elderly: scope of the problem.

Authors:  Bharathi Upadhya; George E Taffet; Che Ping Cheng; Dalane W Kitzman
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 5.000

8.  GLP-1 Improves Diastolic Function and Survival in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  T Dung Nguyen; Yasushige Shingu; Paulo A Amorim; Christina Schenkl; Michael Schwarzer; Torsten Doenst
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 9.  Clinical adoption of prognostic biomarkers: the case for heart failure.

Authors:  Andreas P Kalogeropoulos; Vasiliki V Georgiopoulou; Javed Butler
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.194

Review 10.  Therapeutic interventions for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A summary of current evidence.

Authors:  Muhammad Asrar ul Haq; Chiew Wong; Vivek Mutha; Nagesh Anavekar; Kwang Lim; Peter Barlis; David L Hare
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-02-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.