Literature DB >> 21492608

Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in patients with malfunctioning CSF-shunt.

Armen Melikian1, Anton Korshunov.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A less favorable outcome is usually claimed for ETV in formerly shunted patients, and continuous bias exists on using endoscopy in cases with malfunctioning CSF shunts.
METHODS: A cohort of 60 patients with obstructive triventricular hydrocephalus (mean age 22 years, range 1-68) underwent an ETV instead of shunt revision. Fourteen patients had a history of multiple shunt-related surgeries (more than three times). Median follow-up lasted 2 years (range 1 month-8 years). Data on patients' preoperative condition and their history, including particularities of the surgery, were studied to define the impact of any given variable on the outcome. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess differences among groups.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients did not improve and needed permanent shunts anyway. The remaining 44 patients improved and became free of shunt (72%). No reliable correlation has been found regarding final outcome and data, characterizing patients' profile, for example, etiology of hydrocephalus, the history of intraventricular bleeding and/or CNS infection, age at onset and age at the first shunting, number of shunt surgeries, the origin of shunt malfunction, and complicated ventricular anatomy. There were no deaths, and overall cases with morbidity comprised 20% (12 cases); among them, serious complications with neurologic deficit were noted in three (5%) patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with obstructive hydrocephalus could benefit from ETV in case of their shunt malfunction and if carefully selected have about 70% probability to become shunt free. In formerly shunted patients, endoscopy has somewhat greater risk of serious complications; thus a wider experience is essential when offering them an ETV.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21492608     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  7 in total

Review 1.  Controversy about Management of Hydrocephalus - Shunt vs. Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy.

Authors:  Vikas Kumar; Shaam Bodeliwala; Daljit Singh
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Endoscopic third ventriculocisternostomy in hydrocephalic children under 2 years of age: appropriate or not? A single-center retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  L Fani; T H R de Jong; R Dammers; M L C van Veelen
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 3.  Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy: Success and Failure.

Authors:  Chandrashekhar E Deopujari; Vikram S Karmarkar; Salman T Shaikh
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2017-05-01

4.  Markedly Improved Success Rate of Endoscopically Assisted Third Ventriculostomy Is Achieved by Routine Placement of External Lumbar Drain.

Authors:  Justen Watkins; Marc Cabanne; Dan Miulli
Journal:  J Neurol Surg Rep       Date:  2017-04

5.  Functional and Radiological Parameters to Assess Outcome of Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy in Shunt Failure Patients.

Authors:  R N Naga Santhosh Irrinki; Monika Bawa; Shalini Hegde; Rajesh Chhabra; Vivek Gupta; Sunil K Gupta
Journal:  J Pediatr Neurosci       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun

6.  Simultaneous ventriculoperitoneal shunt removal and endoscopic third ventriculostomy for three patients previously treated for intracranial germ cell tumors more than 20 years ago.

Authors:  Daisuke Kita; Yasuhiko Hayashi; Issei Fukui; Masahiro Oishi; Mitsutoshi Nakada
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Endoscopic third ventriculostomy.

Authors:  Yad Ram Yadav; Vijay Parihar; Sonjjay Pande; Hemant Namdev; Moneet Agarwal
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2012-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.