| Literature DB >> 21492475 |
Liang Wen1, Chengyi Li, Minghe Lin, Zhengquan Yuan, Donghui Huo, Shenlong Li, Yong Wang, Chenyi Chu, Ruizhong Jia, Hongbin Song.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malaria incidence in China's Hainan province has dropped significantly, since Malaria Programme of China Global Fund Round 1 was launched. To lay a foundation for further studies to evaluate the efficacy of Malaria Programme and to help with public health planning and resource allocation in the future, the temporal and spatial variations of malaria epidemic are analysed and areas and seasons with a higher risk are identified at a fine geographic scale within a malaria endemic county in Hainan.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21492475 PMCID: PMC3094226 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-10-88
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Figure 1Location of Wanning county on Hainan island, China.
Figure 2Annual malaria incidence of all 197 villages in Wanning county from 2005 to 2009.
Figure 3Monthly reported number of malaria cases in 37 villages in Wanning county from 2005 to 2009.
Figure 4Total reported number of malaria cases by month in 37 villages in Wanning county from 2005 to 2009.
The clusters of malaria cases detected using the purely temporal analysis
| Year | Cluster time frame | Relative risk | P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 2005/3/1 - 2005/8/31 | 215 | 175.93 | 1.58 | 8.83 | 0.00 |
| 2006 | 2006/5/1 - 2006/10/31 | 202 | 153.25 | 1.95 | 15.95 | 0.00 |
| 2007 | 2007/3/1 - 2007/4/30 | 48 | 30.58 | 1.77 | 5.25 | 0.02 |
| 2008 | 2008/1/1 - 2008/5/31 | 45 | 33.64 | 1.76 | 3.22 | 0.11 |
| 2009 | 2009/2/1 - 2009/7/31 | 18 | 11.90 | 3.05 | 3.24 | 0.12 |
a: The number of observed cases in a cluster; b: The number of expected cases in a cluster;
c: Log likelihood ratio
The clusters of malaria cases detected using the purely spatial analysis
| Cluster | Relative risk | P | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Latitude(N) | Longitude(E) | Radius(Km) | ||||||
| 2005 | A | 18.64666 | 110.10916 | 4.72 | 176 | 47.36 | 6.50 | 134.99 | 0.00 |
| B | 18.96730 | 110.26496 | 0 | 31 | 5.48 | 6.11 | 29.17 | 0.00 | |
| 2006 | A | 18.64666 | 110.10916 | 4.72 | 161 | 41.41 | 7.14 | 131.70 | 0.00 |
| B | 18.96730 | 110.26496 | 0 | 34 | 4.84 | 7.79 | 38.60 | 0.00 | |
| 2007 | A | 18.67405 | 110.14340 | 25.11 | 167 | 86.37 | 11.68 | 81.34 | 0.00 |
| 2008 | A | 18.69753 | 110.17359 | 15.18 | 71 | 26.41 | 14.67 | 53.24 | 0.00 |
| 2009 | A | 18.64666 | 110.10916 | 8.37 | 18 | 4.94 | 11.59 | 16.35 | 0.00 |
a: The number of observed cases in a cluster; b: The number of expected cases in a cluster;
c:Log likelihood ratio; A: Most likely cluster; B: Secondary cluster.
Figure 5Locations of the detected clusters of malaria cases from 2005 to 2009, based on the purely spatial analysis.
The clusters of malaria cases detected using the space-time analysis
| Clusters | Time frame | Coordinates/radius | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 05/1/1-- 07/5/31 | (18.65 N, 110.11 E)/4.72 km | 374 | 60.91 | 9.53 | 429..44 | 0.00 |
| B_1 | 05/2/1-- 07/2/28 | (18.97 N, 110.26 E)/0 km* | 70 | 6.10 | 12.33 | 109.20 | 0.00 |
| B_2 | 05/1/1-- 05/3/31 | (18.84 N, 110.11 E)/17.68 km | 59 | 19.10 | 3.23 | 27.52 | 0.00 |
A: Most likely cluster; B: Secondary cluster; a: The number of observed cases in a cluster;
b: The number of expected cases in a cluster; c: Log likelihood ratio;
#: Relative risk. *: Only 1 village was included in the cluster;
Figure 6Locations of the detected clusters of malaria cases from 2005 to 2009, based on the space-time analysis.