INTRODUCTION: There has been little research published on the impact of intrauterine contraceptive (IUC) methods on sexual functioning. AIMS: This study aimed: (i) to assess different aspects of sexual functioning, including the prevalence of sexual dysfunction in women using a levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS); (ii) to compare this prevalence with that among copper-releasing intrauterine device (Cu-IUD) users; and (iii) to identify the relationship between psychological variables and sexual functioning in women using one of the aforementioned IUCs. METHODS: In a multicenter cross-sectional study, 845 women with an IUC were invited to fill out a questionnaire. The latter was returned by 402 (48%) of them: 353 women were LNG-IUS users (88%) and 49 were Cu-IUD users (12%). The questions asked pertained to depression, well-being, marital relation quality, and sexual functioning. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sexual functioning was measured with the short sexual functioning scale. RESULTS: One-third of LNG-IUS users (33%) reported a sexual dysfunction. Of those, 20% reported an increased sexual desire, 25% a decreased sexual desire, 5% arousal problems, and 8% orgasm problems. Women using a LNG-IUS did not differ significantly in distribution, type, or prevalence (32.9% vs. 36.7%) of sexual dysfunction, nor in depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory score; 4.7 vs. 3.9; P = 0.33), general well-being (WHO-5 well-being scale score; 16.8 vs. 17.7; P = 0.170), or partner relationship quality (Dyadic Adjustment Scale score; 107 vs. 108; P = 0.74) compared to Cu-IUD users. Overall, the perceived influence of IUCs on sexual functioning was in the lower range and did not differentiate LNG-IUS greatly from Cu-IUD-users. CONCLUSION: Women using a LNG-IUS do not differ from those wearing a Cu-IUD with regard to psychological and sexual functioning. The perceived impact of IUD use on sexuality should not be overestimated.
INTRODUCTION: There has been little research published on the impact of intrauterine contraceptive (IUC) methods on sexual functioning. AIMS: This study aimed: (i) to assess different aspects of sexual functioning, including the prevalence of sexual dysfunction in women using a levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS); (ii) to compare this prevalence with that among copper-releasing intrauterine device (Cu-IUD) users; and (iii) to identify the relationship between psychological variables and sexual functioning in women using one of the aforementioned IUCs. METHODS: In a multicenter cross-sectional study, 845 women with an IUC were invited to fill out a questionnaire. The latter was returned by 402 (48%) of them: 353 women were LNG-IUS users (88%) and 49 were Cu-IUD users (12%). The questions asked pertained to depression, well-being, marital relation quality, and sexual functioning. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sexual functioning was measured with the short sexual functioning scale. RESULTS: One-third of LNG-IUS users (33%) reported a sexual dysfunction. Of those, 20% reported an increased sexual desire, 25% a decreased sexual desire, 5% arousal problems, and 8% orgasm problems. Women using a LNG-IUS did not differ significantly in distribution, type, or prevalence (32.9% vs. 36.7%) of sexual dysfunction, nor in depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory score; 4.7 vs. 3.9; P = 0.33), general well-being (WHO-5 well-being scale score; 16.8 vs. 17.7; P = 0.170), or partner relationship quality (Dyadic Adjustment Scale score; 107 vs. 108; P = 0.74) compared to Cu-IUD users. Overall, the perceived influence of IUCs on sexual functioning was in the lower range and did not differentiate LNG-IUS greatly from Cu-IUD-users. CONCLUSION:Women using a LNG-IUS do not differ from those wearing a Cu-IUD with regard to psychological and sexual functioning. The perceived impact of IUD use on sexuality should not be overestimated.
Authors: Maurizio Guida; Manuela Farris; Carmen Imma Aquino; Elena Rosato; Lucio M A Cipullo; Carlo Bastianelli Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: James Curtis Dring; Alicja Forma; Zuzanna Chilimoniuk; Maciej Dobosz; Grzegorz Teresiński; Grzegorz Buszewicz; Jolanta Flieger; Tomasz Cywka; Jacek Januszewski; Jacek Baj Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-12-31 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Jan Baekelandt; Peter A De Mulder; Ilse Le Roy; Chantal Mathieu; Annouschka Laenen; Paul Enzlin; Steven Weyers; Ben Wj Mol; Jan Ja Bosteels Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-08-12 Impact factor: 2.692