Literature DB >> 21492377

The infusion method trial of void vs standard catheter removal in the outpatient setting: a prospective randomized trial.

Mark A Boccola1, Anant Sharma, Claire Taylor, Lih-Ming Wong, Douglas Travis, Steven Chan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: • To ascertain if filling the bladder with warm normal saline before trial of void (TOV) reduces time to decision of outcome of TOV and time to discharge compared with standard in-dwelling catheter (IDC) removal in the outpatient setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: • A prospective randomized controlled trial (not blinded) was carried out in the day procedure unit. Randomization was done using computer-generated random numbers. The sample size was calculated based on initial pilot data using α= 0.05 and β= 0.2 and a clinically important reduction of ≥60 min for time to decision of outcome of TOV (primary outcome measure). • In all, 60 consecutive patients were recruited from two referral sources: presentations of acute urinary retention to the emergency department and patients discharged home after failing TOV postoperatively. • The infusion method group (32 patients) had 300-500 mL warm normal saline infused into the bladder before removing their IDC and the control group (28) had standard IDC removal. • Data were collected and analysed using the two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
RESULTS: • The median time to decision was 135.0 (95% confidence interval CI 95.0-190.0) min in the infusion group and 247.5 (95% CI 189.6-294.1) min in the control group. • Patients undergoing a bladder infusion had a shorter discharge time [180.0 (95% CI 126.0-226.9) min] than patients in the standard-IDC-removal group [262.5 (95% CI 233.8-315.0) min]. • The infusion arm shortened time to decision by 112.5 min (P < 0.001) and time to discharge by 82.5 min (P < 0.001). • Furthermore, patients in the infusion group were 1.56 times more likely to achieve catheter-free state after TOV (risk ratio 1.56, 95% CI 1.03-2.36; P= 0.03).
CONCLUSION: • The infusion method for TOV is safe and expeditious, making it ideal for the outpatient setting. This randomized study shows that the infusion method enables a rapid determination of outcome of TOV with a greater chance of success and shortened discharge times.
© 2011 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2011 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21492377     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10044.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  2 in total

1.  Postoperative Bladder Filling After Outpatient Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Time to Discharge: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Lisa Chao; Suketu Mansuria
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Bladder infusion versus standard catheter removal for trial of void: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joshua Makary; Kevin Phan; George McClintock; Marinelle Doctor; David Habashy; Sean Heywood; Steve P McCombie; Mohan Arianayagam; Bertram Canagasingham; Richard Ferguson; Ahmed Goolam; Mohamed Khadra; Raymond Ko; Celi Varol; Matthew Winter; Matthew J Roberts
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.226

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.