Literature DB >> 21492236

Influence of topography and hydrophilicity on initial oral biofilm formation on microstructured titanium surfaces in vitro.

A Almaguer-Flores1, R Olivares-Navarrete, M Wieland, L A Ximénez-Fyvie, Z Schwartz, B D Boyan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of the microtopography and hydrophilicity of titanium (Ti) substrates on initial oral biofilm formation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine bacterial species belonging to the normal oral microbiota, including: Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Actinomyces israelii, Campylobacter rectus, Eikenella corrodens, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Parvimonas micra, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Streptococcus sanguinis were tested on Ti surfaces: pretreatment (PT [R(a) <0.2 μm]), acid-etched (A [R(a) <0.8 μm]), A modified to be hydrophilic (modA), sand-blasted/acid-etched (SLA [R(a) =4 μm]), and hydrophilic SLA (modSLA). Disks were incubated for 24 h in anaerobic conditions using a normal culture medium (CM) or human saliva (HS). The total counts of bacteria and the proportion of each bacterial species were analysed by checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization.
RESULTS: Higher counts of bacteria were observed on all surfaces incubated with CM compared with the samples incubated with HS. PT, SLA, and modSLA exhibited higher numbers of attached bacteria in CM, whereas SLA and modSLA had a significant increase in bacterial adhesion in HS. The proportion of the species in the initial biofilms was also influenced by the surface properties and the media used: SLA and modSLA increased the proportion of species like A. actinomycetemcomitans and S. sanguinis in both media, while the adhesion of A. israelii and P. gingivalis on the same surfaces was affected in the presence of saliva.
CONCLUSIONS: The initial biofilm formation and composition were affected by the microtopography and hydrophilicity of the surface and by the media used.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21492236      PMCID: PMC4287405          DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02184.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  56 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections.

Authors:  J W Costerton; P S Stewart; E P Greenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Biofilm theory can guide the treatment of device-related orthopaedic infections.

Authors:  J William Costerton
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Reduction of background problems in nonradioactive northern and Southern blot analyses enables higher sensitivity than 32P-based hybridizations.

Authors:  G Engler-Blum; M Meier; J Frank; G A Müller
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1993-05-01       Impact factor: 3.365

Review 4.  Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterial surfaces.

Authors:  Y H An; R J Friedman
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1998

Review 5.  Role of adhesion in microbial colonization of host tissues: a contribution of oral microbiology.

Authors:  R J Gibbons
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  Relationship between the ability of oral streptococci to interact with platelet glycoprotein Ibalpha and with the salivary low-molecular-weight mucin, MG2.

Authors:  Christopher Plummer; Charles William Ian Douglas
Journal:  FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol       Date:  2006-10-27

7.  alpha-Amylase and salivary albumin adsorption onto titanium, enamel and dentin: an in vivo study.

Authors:  D Kohavi; A Klinger; D Steinberg; E Mann; N M Sela
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  "Checkerboard" DNA-DNA hybridization.

Authors:  S S Socransky; C Smith; L Martin; B J Paster; F E Dewhirst; A E Levin
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 1.993

9.  Surface-free energy and bacterial adhesion. An in vivo study in beagle dogs.

Authors:  J van Dijk; F Herkströter; H Busscher; A Weerkamp; H Jansen; J Arends
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 8.728

10.  Analysis of early biofilm formation on oral implants in man.

Authors:  W Heuer; C Elter; A Demling; A Neumann; S Suerbaum; M Hannig; T Heidenblut; F W Bach; M Stiesch-Scholz
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.837

View more
  14 in total

1.  Effects of low-frequency ultrasound treatment of titanium surface roughness on osteoblast phenotype and maturation.

Authors:  Janina Sedlaczek; Christoph H Lohmann; Ethan M Lotz; Sharon L Hyzy; Barbara D Boyan; Zvi Schwartz
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 5.977

2.  Effect of UV-photofunctionalization on oral bacterial attachment and biofilm formation to titanium implant material.

Authors:  Erica Dorigatti de Avila; Bruno P Lima; Takeo Sekiya; Yasuyoshi Torii; Takahiro Ogawa; Wenyuan Shi; Renate Lux
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 3.  Ways to control harmful biofilms: prevention, inhibition, and eradication.

Authors:  Wen Yin; Siyang Xu; Yiting Wang; Yuling Zhang; Shan-Ho Chou; Michael Y Galperin; Jin He
Journal:  Crit Rev Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 7.624

4.  Novel Osteogenic Ti-6Al-4V Device For Restoration Of Dental Function In Patients With Large Bone Deficiencies: Design, Development And Implementation.

Authors:  D J Cohen; A Cheng; A Kahn; M Aviram; A J Whitehead; S L Hyzy; R M Clohessy; B D Boyan; Z Schwartz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Evaluation of the role of substrate and albumin on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm morphology through FESEM and FTIR studies on polymeric biomaterials.

Authors:  S Dutta Sinha; Susmita Chatterjee; P K Maiti; S Tarafdar; S P Moulik
Journal:  Prog Biomater       Date:  2017-02-02

6.  Biofilm Analysis of Retrieved Dental Implants after Different Peri-Implantitis Treatments.

Authors:  Thaise C Geremias; Juan F D Montero; Ricardo de Souza Magini; Guenther Schuldt Filho; Edival Barreto de Magalhães; Marco A Bianchini
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2017-04-09

Review 7.  The Relationship between Biofilm and Physical-Chemical Properties of Implant Abutment Materials for Successful Dental Implants.

Authors:  Erica Dorigatti de Avila; Rafael Scaf de Molon; Carlos Eduardo Vergani; Francisco de Assis Mollo; Vehid Salih
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  In Vitro Assessment of Early Bacterial Activity on Micro/Nanostructured Ti6Al4V Surfaces.

Authors:  Benjamin Valdez-Salas; Ernesto Beltrán-Partida; Sandra Castillo-Uribe; Mario Curiel-Álvarez; Roumen Zlatev; Margarita Stoytcheva; Gisela Montero-Alpírez; Lidia Vargas-Osuna
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  Polyspecies biofilm formation on implant surfaces with different surface characteristics.

Authors:  Patrick R Schmidlin; Phillip Müller; Thomas Attin; Marco Wieland; Deborah Hofer; Bernhard Guggenheim
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

10.  Antibiofilm peptides against biofilms on titanium and hydroxyapatite surfaces.

Authors:  Dan Wang; Markus Haapasalo; Yuan Gao; Jingzhi Ma; Ya Shen
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2018-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.