Literature DB >> 2149211

Improved physical performance outcomes after functional restoration treatment in patients with chronic low-back pain. Early versus recent training results.

S Kohles1, D Barnes, R J Gatchel, T G Mayer.   

Abstract

Functional restoration, a medically supervised team treatment approach that addresses deficits that accompany the deconditioning process in patients with chronic low-back pain, has emerged as a viable rehabilitation alternative. While the primary emphasis of this treatment approach has remained unchanged since its inception over 6 years ago, recent rapid advances in quantification technology and understanding of the complexity of the chronic low-back pain (CLBP) syndrome have led to more sophisticated and aggressive rehabilitation efforts. In the current study, the authors examined two groups of patients with CLBP, from the treatment program's initial (n = 45) and most recent years (n = 57) of operation, respectively, to determine if the evolution of the treatment program has resulted in increased gains in physical capacity between these groups of patients. Patients in each group were assessed on measures of isokinetic trunk strength and spinal range of motion at program admission and discharge. Both groups demonstrated improved physical capacity levels, but the recent group also demonstrated considerably higher physical capacity levels than the early group, at both program admission and discharge. It was concluded that functional restoration continues to be successful with CLBP patients, and that increased preprogram training and education may facilitate a more rapid elimination of inhibitory factors (ie, pain, fear of reinjury), which often impede and slow physical training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2149211     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199012000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  10 in total

1.  Differences among outcome measures in occupational low back pain.

Authors:  Sue A Ferguson; William S Marras; Deborah L Burr
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-09

2.  Factors related to outcome following a work hardening program.

Authors:  D C Voaklander; A P Beaulne; R A Lessard
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1995-06

3.  A prospective study of the interrelationship between subjective and objective measures of disability before and 2 months after lumbar decompression surgery for disc herniation.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Jiri Dvorak; Markus Müntener; Dieter Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Should backache be treated with spinal fusion? The case for spinal fusion is unproved.

Authors:  J Wilson-MacDonald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-06

5.  Low back pain in the workplace: attainable benefits not attained.

Authors:  W O Spitzer
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1993-05

6.  A new non exercise-based VO2max prediction equation for patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Ivan Leonardo Duque; José-Hernán Parra; Alain Duvallet
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-05-07

7.  Randomised controlled trial for evaluation of fitness programme for patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  H Frost; J A Klaber Moffett; J S Moser; J C Fairbank
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-21

8.  [Multidisciplinary treatment program for chronic low back pain, part 2. Somatic aspects].

Authors:  P Saur; J Hildebrandt; M Pfingsten; D Seeger; U Steinmetz; A Straub; J Hahn; B Kasi; R Heinemann; D Koch
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1996-10-28       Impact factor: 1.107

9.  [Multidisciplinary treatment program for chronic low back pain, part 1. Overview].

Authors:  J Hildebrandt; M Pfingsten; C Franz; P Saur; D Seeger
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1996-08-26       Impact factor: 1.107

10.  Worker rehabilitation programs. Separating fact from fiction.

Authors:  A J Haig; S Penha
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1991-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.