Literature DB >> 21490577

Imaging cell shape change in living Drosophila embryos.

Lauren Figard1, Anna Marie Sokac.   

Abstract

The developing Drosophila melanogaster embryo undergoes a number of cell shape changes that are highly amenable to live confocal imaging. Cell shape changes in the fly are analogous to those in higher organisms, and they drive tissue morphogenesis. So, in many cases, their study has direct implications for understanding human disease (Table 1)(1-5). On the sub-cellular scale, these cell shape changes are the product of activities ranging from gene expression to signal transduction, cell polarity, cytoskeletal remodeling and membrane trafficking. Thus, the Drosophila embryo provides not only the context to evaluate cell shape changes as they relate to tissue morphogenesis, but also offers a completely physiological environment to study the sub-cellular activities that shape cells. The protocol described here is designed to image a specific cell shape change called cellularization. Cellularization is a process of dramatic plasma membrane growth, and it ultimately converts the syncytial embryo into the cellular blastoderm. That is, at interphase of mitotic cycle 14, the plasma membrane simultaneously invaginates around each of ~6000 cortically anchored nuclei to generate a sheet of primary epithelial cells. Counter to previous suggestions, cellularization is not driven by Myosin-2 contractility(6), but is instead fueled largely by exocytosis of membrane from internal stores(7). Thus, cellularization is an excellent system for studying membrane trafficking during cell shape changes that require plasma membrane invagination or expansion, such as cytokinesis or transverse-tubule (T-tubule) morphogenesis in muscle. Note that this protocol is easily applied to the imaging of other cell shape changes in the fly embryo, and only requires slight adaptations such as changing the stage of embryo collection, or using "embryo glue" to mount the embryo in a specific orientation (Table 1)(8-19). In all cases, the workflow is basically the same (Figure 1). Standard methods for cloning and Drosophila transgenesis are used to prepare stable fly stocks that express a protein of interest, fused to Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) or its variants, and these flies provide a renewable source of embryos. Alternatively, fluorescent proteins/probes are directly introduced into fly embryos via straightforward micro-injection techniques(9-10). Then, depending on the developmental event and cell shape change to be imaged, embryos are collected and staged by morphology on a dissecting microscope, and finally positioned and mounted for time-lapse imaging on a confocal microscope.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21490577      PMCID: PMC3197300          DOI: 10.3791/2503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  24 in total

1.  A protein trap strategy to detect GFP-tagged proteins expressed from their endogenous loci in Drosophila.

Authors:  X Morin; R Daneman; M Zavortink; W Chia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Parallels between tissue repair and embryo morphogenesis.

Authors:  Paul Martin; Susan M Parkhurst
Journal:  Development       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.868

3.  Multicellular rosette formation links planar cell polarity to tissue morphogenesis.

Authors:  J Todd Blankenship; Stephanie T Backovic; Justina S P Sanny; Ori Weitz; Jennifer A Zallen
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 12.270

4.  A photographic study of development in the living embryo of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M Bownes
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1975-06

5.  Cortical actin dynamics facilitate early-stage centrosome separation.

Authors:  Jian Cao; Justin Crest; Barbara Fasulo; William Sullivan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Epithelial tube morphogenesis during Drosophila tracheal development requires Piopio, a luminal ZP protein.

Authors:  Anna Jaźwińska; Carlos Ribeiro; Markus Affolter
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2003-09-14       Impact factor: 28.824

7.  Reassessing the role and dynamics of nonmuscle myosin II during furrow formation in early Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  Anne Royou; Christine Field; John C Sisson; William Sullivan; Roger Karess
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-12-02       Impact factor: 4.138

8.  Myosin-dependent junction remodelling controls planar cell intercalation and axis elongation.

Authors:  Claire Bertet; Lawrence Sulak; Thomas Lecuit
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Real-time imaging of cell-cell adherens junctions reveals that Drosophila mesoderm invagination begins with two phases of apical constriction of cells.

Authors:  H Oda; S Tsukita
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  Multiple forces contribute to cell sheet morphogenesis for dorsal closure in Drosophila.

Authors:  D P Kiehart; C G Galbraith; K A Edwards; W L Rickoll; R A Montague
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2000-04-17       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Methods for studying planar cell polarity.

Authors:  Jessica Olofsson; Jeffrey D Axelrod
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Membrane Supply and Demand Regulates F-Actin in a Cell Surface Reservoir.

Authors:  Lauren Figard; Mengyu Wang; Liuliu Zheng; Ido Golding; Anna Marie Sokac
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 12.270

3.  Crumbs organizes the transport machinery by regulating apical levels of PI(4,5)P2 in Drosophila.

Authors:  Johanna Lattner; Weihua Leng; Elisabeth Knust; Marko Brankatschk; David Flores-Benitez
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Live Imaging of mRNA Synthesis in Drosophila.

Authors:  Hernan G Garcia; Thomas Gregor
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2018

5.  The plasma membrane flattens out to fuel cell-surface growth during Drosophila cellularization.

Authors:  Lauren Figard; Heng Xu; Hernan G Garcia; Ido Golding; Anna Marie Sokac
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 12.270

6.  Optogenetic inhibition of actomyosin reveals mechanical bistability of the mesoderm epithelium during Drosophila mesoderm invagination.

Authors:  Hanqing Guo; Michael Swan; Bing He
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Studying mitotic checkpoint by illustrating dynamic kinetochore protein behavior and chromosome motion in living Drosophila syncytial embryos.

Authors:  Maureen Sinclair; Jun-Yong Huang
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Imaging Intranuclear Actin Rods in Live Heat Stressed Drosophila Embryos.

Authors:  Natalie Biel; Lauren Figard; Anna Marie Sokac
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 1.424

9.  Combining protein and mRNA quantification to decipher transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  Heng Xu; Leonardo A Sepúlveda; Lauren Figard; Anna Marie Sokac; Ido Golding
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 28.547

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.