Literature DB >> 21490450

Genetic variants in DNA repair predicts the survival of patients with esophageal cancer.

Jang-Ming Lee1, Pei-Wen Yang, Shi-Yi Yang, Tzu-Hsuen Chuang, En-Chi Tung, Jin-Shing Chen, Pei-Ming Huang, Yung-Chie Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of the genetic variants in excision repair cross-complementation group 2 (ERCC2) R156R and ERCC4 rs3136038 with survival duration for patients with esophageal cancer.
BACKGROUND: ERCC2 and ERCC4 are important molecules participating nucleotide excision repair system. The clinical relevance of the genetic variants of these genes is largely unknown currently. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 400 patients with a diagnosis of esophageal cancer were included. The genetic variants in the promoter regions of ERCC2 on R156R and ERCC4 on rs3136038 were analyzed with the TaqMan assay from leukocyte DNA collected before treatment and correlated to survival of the patients.
RESULTS: Presence with ERCC2 R156R C/C or ERCC4 rs3136038 C/T genotype of the patients could additively increase risk of death and disease progression. Under multivariate analysis, T, N staging and simultaneous presentation of these unfavorable genotypes were found significant for prognosis (P < 0.05). Accumulation of each unfavorable genotype would associate with adjusted HRs [95% CI] of 1.35 [1.10-1.65] and 1.37 [1.12-1.68] (P ≤ 0.05) for death and disease progression respectively. The prognostic impact of these genotypes were more evident in the subgroup of patients with early disease status including T staging (II or less), free from lymph node metastasis or being able to undergo surgical resection (P < 0.05 for both overall and disease progression-free survival duration, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Genetic variants in ERCC2 and ERCC4 may provide further survival prediction in addition to TNM staging system of esophageal cancer, which is more evident in the patients with early disease status. @ 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21490450     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318216f374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  12 in total

1.  p16 (CDKN2A) SNP rs11515 was not associated with head and neck carcinoma.

Authors:  Ugo Borges Pinheiro; Carlos Alberto de Carvalho Fraga; Danilo Cangussu Mendes; Luciano Marques-Silva; Lucyana Conceição Farias; Marcela Gonçalves de Souza; Mariana Batista Soares; Kimberly Marie Jones; Sérgio Henrique Souza Santos; Alfredo Maurício Batista de Paula; Gustavo Velásquez-Meléndez; André Luiz Guimarães
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-03-15

2.  Single nucleotide polymorphisms in nucleotide excision repair genes, cancer treatment, and head and neck cancer survival.

Authors:  Annah B Wyss; Mark C Weissler; Christy L Avery; Amy H Herring; Jeannette T Bensen; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; William K Funkhouser; Andrew F Olshan
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Fuzzy clustering demonstrates that codon 72 SNP rs1042522 of TP53 gene associated with HNSCC but not with prognoses.

Authors:  Ugo Borges Pinheiro; Carlos Alberto de Carvalho Fraga; Danilo Cangussu Mendes; Lucyana Conceição Farias; Cláudio Marcelo Cardoso; Christine Mendes Silveira; Marcos Flávio Silveira Vasconcelos D'Angelo; Kimberly Marie Jones; Sérgio Henrique Souza Santos; Alfredo Maurício Batista de Paula; André Luiz Sena Guimarães
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-06-23

Review 4.  Translational research in thoracic surgery-the National Taiwan University Hospital experience.

Authors:  Mong-Wei Lin; Pei-Wen Yang; Jang-Ming Lee
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  The R156R ERCC2 polymorphism as a risk factor of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Magdalena M Michalska; Dariusz Samulak; Filip Jabłoński; Hanna Romanowicz; Beata Smolarz
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-09-09

6.  Mitogen activated protein kinase kinase kinase 3 (MAP3K3/MEKK3) overexpression is an early event in esophageal tumorigenesis and is a predictor of poor disease prognosis.

Authors:  Raghibul Hasan; Rinu Sharma; Anoop Saraya; Tushar K Chattopadhyay; Siddartha DattaGupta; Paul G Walfish; Shyam S Chauhan; Ranju Ralhan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Genetic variants of DNA repair genes predict the survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer receiving platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Fei Zhou; Meiling Zhu; Mengyun Wang; Lixin Qiu; Lei Cheng; Ming Jia; Jiaqing Xiang; Qingyi Wei
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 5.531

8.  Slug is a predictor of poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Md Raghibul Hasan; Rinu Sharma; Anoop Saraya; Tushar K Chattopadhyay; Siddartha DattaGupta; Paul G Walfish; Shyam S Chauhan; Ranju Ralhan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The associations between immunity-related genes and breast cancer prognosis in Korean women.

Authors:  Jaesung Choi; Nan Song; Sohee Han; Seokang Chung; Hyuna Sung; Ji-young Lee; Sunjae Jung; Sue K Park; Keun-Young Yoo; Wonshik Han; Jong Won Lee; Dong-Young Noh; Daehee Kang; Ji-Yeob Choi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of somatic and germline DNA sequence biomarkers of esophageal cancer survival, therapy response and stage.

Authors:  J M Findlay; M R Middleton; I Tomlinson
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.