Literature DB >> 21489830

Detecting patient safety indicators: How valid is "foreign body left during procedure" in the Veterans Health Administration?

Qi Chen1, Amy K Rosen, Marisa Cevasco, Marlena Shin, Kamal M F Itani, Ann M Borzecki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) developed patient safety indicator (PSI) 5, "Foreign body left during procedure," to flag accidental foreign bodies in surgical and medical procedures. This study examined how well this indicator identifies true foreign body events in the Veterans Health Administration (VA). STUDY
DESIGN: This was a retrospective study within 28 selected VA hospitals from fiscal year 2003 to 2007. Trained abstractors reviewed medical charts flagged by PSI 5 and determined true foreign body cases. We calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) of this indicator and performed descriptive analyses of true positive and false positive cases.
RESULTS: Of the 652,093 eligible cases, 93 were flagged by PSI 5 (0.14 per 1,000). Forty-two were true positives, yielding a PPV of 45% (95% CI 35% to 56%). False positives were due to a foreign body that was present on admission (57%) or coding errors (43%). True foreign bodies were associated with surgical (n = 23) and medical (n = 19) procedures. The most common type of surgical foreign body was a sponge (52%). Overall, approximately 40% of foreign bodies were related to a device failure or malfunction (30% surgical vs 53% medical foreign bodies). Postoperative complications included pain (24%), infection (12%), adhesions (5%), and bowel obstruction (5%).
CONCLUSIONS: The reported rate of foreign body events as detected by PSI 5 is low in the VA, but occurs in both surgical and medical procedures. Despite widespread implementation of surgical counts, quality improvement efforts should focus on novel ways to eliminate this "never event" from operations. Future studies are needed to better understand the preventability of medical procedure-associated foreign bodies and particularly, device failure-related foreign bodies. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21489830     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  8 in total

1.  Using estimated true safety event rates versus flagged safety event rates: does it change hospital profiling and payment?

Authors:  Amy K Rosen; Qi Chen; Ann M Borzecki; Marlena Shin; Kamal M F Itani; Michael Shwartz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Impact of including readmissions for qualifying events in the patient safety indicators.

Authors:  Sheryl M Davies; Olga Saynina; Laurence C Baker; Kathryn M McDonald
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  Validity of ICD-9-CM codes for the identification of complications related to central venous catheterization.

Authors:  Melissa H Tukey; Ann M Borzecki; Renda Soylemez Wiener
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Using AHRQ patient safety indicators to detect postdischarge adverse events in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Hillary J Mull; Ann M Borzecki; Qi Chen; Marlena H Shin; Amy K Rosen
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 1.852

5.  Investigating selected patient safety indicators using medical records data.

Authors:  Hedayatalah Asgari; Sakineh Saghaeiannejad Esfahani; Maryam Yaghoubi; Marzieh Javadi; Saeed Karimi
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2015-08-06

6.  Three years evaluation of retained foreign bodies after surgery in Iran.

Authors:  Mohammad Zarenezhad; Saeed Gholamzadeh; Arya Hedjazi; Kamran Soltani; Jaber Gharehdaghi; Masoud Ghadipasha; Seyyed Mohammad Vahid Hosseini; Ahmad Zare
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2017-01-25

7.  Perioperative patient safety indicators and hospital surgical volumes.

Authors:  Takefumi Kitazawa; Kunichika Matsumoto; Shigeru Fujita; Ai Yoshida; Shuhei Iida; Hirotoshi Nishizawa; Tomonori Hasegawa
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-02-28

8.  Validation of two case definitions to identify pressure ulcers using hospital administrative data.

Authors:  Chester Ho; Jason Jiang; Cathy A Eastwood; Holly Wong; Brittany Weaver; Hude Quan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.