Literature DB >> 21489718

Adverse events following digital replantation in the elderly.

Ario Barzin1, Tina Hernandez-Boussard, Gordon K Lee, Catherine Curtin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The decision to proceed with digital replantation in the elderly can be challenging. In addition to success of the replanted part, perioperative morbidity and mortality must be considered. The purpose of this study was to compare adverse events in patients less than 65 years of age compared with those 65 years and older after digital replantation. We hypothesize that there is an increased incidence of mortality and sentinel adverse events in patients aged 65 and older.
METHODS: We obtained data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample over a 10-year period from 1998 to 2007. Replantation was identified using International Classification of Diseases-9 procedure codes for finger and thumb reattachment (84.21 and 84.22). Adverse events were identified using Patient Safety Indicators (PSI) to identify adverse events occurring during hospitalization. We used the Charlson index to study medical comorbidities and bivariate statistics.
RESULTS: During the study period 15,413 finger and thumb replantations were performed in the United States, with 616 performed on patients age 65 and older. The overall in-hospital mortality was 0.04% with no statistical difference when factoring age. For the entire group, the percentage of PSI was 0.6%, the most common being postoperative deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolus. Overall, there was no difference in PSI between the 2 groups. The older group had a higher rate of transfusion, 4% versus 8% (p < .05) and were more likely to have a nonroutine disposition (ie, nursing home) (p < .001). We found no correlation between the Charlson index and PSI.
CONCLUSIONS: This study found no difference in sentinel perioperative complications or mortality when comparing replantation patients under 65 years of age and those age 65 and older. Age alone should not be an absolute contraindication to finger replantation. Instead, the patient's functional demands, type of injury, general state of health, and rehabilitative potential should drive the decision of whether to proceed with replantation.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21489718     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.01.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  6 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness of Initial Revision Digit Amputation Performed in the Emergency Department Versus the Operating Room.

Authors:  Joseph A Gil; Avi D Goodman; Andrew P Harris; Neill Y Li; Arnold-Peter C Weiss
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-07-30

2.  Survival Rate of Limb Replantation in Different Age Groups.

Authors:  Masahiro Tatebe; Shiro Urata; Kenji Tanaka; Toshikazu Kurahashi; Shinsuke Takeda; Hitoshi Hirata
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2017-07-31

3.  Lessons Learned in Scalp Reconstruction and Tailoring Free Tissue Transfer in the Elderly: A Case Series and Literature Review.

Authors:  Michael Sosin; Arif Chaudhry; Carla De La Cruz; Branko Bojovic; Paul N Manson; Eduardo D Rodriguez
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-11-24

4.  An increasing number of hand injuries in an elderly population - a retrospective study over a 30-year period.

Authors:  Hans-Eric Rosberg; Lars B Dahlin
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  Implications of Aging in Plastic Surgery.

Authors:  Danny S Roh; Adriana C Panayi; Shalender Bhasin; Dennis P Orgill; Indranil Sinha
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-01-14

6.  Preoperative Cryopreservation Promotes Digital Survival after Digit Replantation.

Authors:  Yu Tian; Nan Li; Wei Wang; Lei Liu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.238

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.