Literature DB >> 21489318

Cell fate takes a slug in BRCA1-associated breast cancer.

Geoffrey J Lindeman1, Jane E Visvader.   

Abstract

Understanding why BRCA1 mutation carriers have a predilection for developing clinically aggressive basal-like breast tumors could inform the development of targeted treatment or prevention strategies. Analysis of both mouse and human mammary epithelial cells has identified a role for BRCA1 in orchestrating differentiation. The ability to isolate discrete epithelial subpopulations from mammary tissue has recently directed attention to luminal progenitor cells - the descendants of mammary stem cells - as the likely 'cells-of-origin' in BRCA1-associated breast cancer. A new publication has confirmed the importance of aberrant luminal cells as key culprits and provided insights on how BRCA1 haploinsufficiency biases luminal cells toward a basal-like fate through aberrant expression of the transcription factor SLUG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21489318      PMCID: PMC3219185          DOI: 10.1186/bcr2840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res        ISSN: 1465-5411            Impact factor:   6.466


Women harboring mutations in the tumor suppressor gene BRCA1 (breast cancer 1, early onset) have a profound predisposition to early-onset breast or ovarian cancer or both. BRCA1-associated breast tumors are characteristically 'basal-like', containing minimal estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 and expressing 'basal' cytokeratins and epidermal growth factor receptor. Basal-like tumors were originally defined on the basis of microarray studies, in which their molecular signature suggested similarities to basal cells resident in normal breast epithelium. Such observations led to the hypothesis that BRCA1-associated tumors arose from stem cells. Moreover, mammary stem cells exhibit a similar 'triple-negative' phenotype. BRCA1 plays a crucial role in orchestrating the response to double-stranded DNA damage but is recognized to have multiple other functions. In vitro cellular assays have indicated roles in regulating mammary epithelial cell proliferation and differentiation and in promoting luminal-to-basal lineage transdifferentiation [1-4]. The ability to fractionate mammary epithelium into different subtypes has enabled insights into target cells prone to tumorigenesis. Using human breast tissue, Liu et al. [5] observed that BRCA1 was required for ER-negative stem/progenitor cells to differentiate into mature ER-positive luminal cells. Lim et al. [6] evaluated pathologically normal primary breast tissue samples from haploinsufficient BRCA1 patients and identified an aberrant luminal progenitor population with factor-independent growth properties. A similar observation was made in Brca1-deficient mice [6]. Consistent with a luminal progenitor cell defect, breast tissue from BRCA1 mutation carriers generally showed an increase in this subset relative to the total epithelial population. Moreover, the molecular signature of luminal progenitor cells was found to be more similar to that of basal-like tumors than to that of any other tumor subtype [6]. Overall, these findings indicated, but did not prove, that luminal progenitors are the 'cells-of-origin' for basal-like tumors arising in BRCA1 carriers. An important study by Molyneux et al. [7] conditionally deleted Brca1 in different epithelial populations (heterozygous for p53) and revealed that luminal rather than basal cells were predisposed to basal-like mammary tumors. These in vivo experiments provided direct evidence that BRCA1-associated breast cancers can arise from luminal ER-negative progenitors. A recent study by Proia et al. [8] further highlighted the relevance of luminal cells in haploinsu cient BRCA1 human breast tissue. With an elegant in vivo assay, fresh breast epithelial cells from wild-type or BRCA1women were simultaneously transduced with potent lentiviruses encoding mutant p53, cyclin D1, activated phosphoinositide 3- kinase (PI3K), and oncogenic K-ras and implanted into humanized mammary fat pads of nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency disease (NOD/SCID) mice. Whereas luminal and basal-like tumors arose in mice implanted with wild- type cells, BRCA1cells largely yielded basal-like tumors, indicative of a preprogrammed epithelial defect that dictates tumor phenotype. Proia et al. [8] also used epithelial subsets to demonstrate preferential transformation of luminal compared to basal cells. Gene profiling of wild-type and BRCA1breast epithelia generated a molecular signature enriched for Wnt, Notch, and melanogenesis signaling pathways in BRCA1tissue. Those findings prompted an evaluation of the transcriptional repressor SLUG, which can be activated by these pathways. SLUG is a member of the SNAIL family and has been shown to have an important role in coordinating the epithelial-mesenchymal transition and programming cells toward a basal-like phenotype in breast cancer [9-11]. SLUG is normally expressed in the basal/stem cell-enriched population in both mice and humans [12]. Interestingly, although SLUG mRNA levels were unperturbed in BRCA1tissue, abundant levels of SLUG protein were observed. Moreover, knock-down of BRCA1 by short interfering RNAs in breast cell lines resulted in a twofold increase in SLUG protein. Conversely, knockdown of SLUG in breast epithelial cells biased them toward a more luminal cell fate [8]. Thus, BRCA1 appears to regulate SLUG protein stability, and this may directly influence the cell fate specification of luminal progenitor cells. The precise mechanism through which BRCA1 contributes to SLUG protein stabilization remains to be elucidated. A direct interaction between SLUG with BRCA1 was not found, nor did knockdown of the BRCA1-associated RING domain-1 protein (BARD1) alter SLUG levels [8]. The interesting link between BRCA1 and SLUG in perturbing cell fate decisions will undoubtedly form the basis of future studies. Despite similarities in the epithelial subsets defined by EpCAM and CD49f by Proia et al. [8], there are also some noteworthy differences. In contrast to previous authors [6,13,14], Proia et al. [8] describe two potentially distinct basal subsets: an EpCAMlow population ('basal/myoepithelial') and an EpCAM- population ('mesenchymal' or 'basal progenitor') [15], the latter of which appears to be novel. This subset was found to be expanded in BRCA1breast tissue (with no change in the luminal progenitor subset) and was attributed to diversion of luminal cells toward a basal cell fate. On the other hand, we observed a significant decrease in the basal subset [6] as well as reduced numbers of mammary stem cells in mice. In addition, the mature luminal subpopulation contained a dramatically increased number of CK5/6-expressing cells and fewer PR-positive cells, consistent with a perturbation in differentiation [6]. These differing observations may, in part, reflect different methodological approaches (magnetic beads versus flow cytometry for lineage depletion) and gating strategies used for cell fractionation as well as possible variation between breast samples. Of the 12 BRCA1samples described by Proia et al. [8], at least a third of patients had prior breast cancer. Chemotherapy or endocrine therapy may modify epithelial cell composition. Regardless of these differences, both studies identify BRCA1 as a key regulator of luminal cells. In summary, one striking consequence of BRCA1 deficiency in mammary epithelium appears to be perturbed cell fate specification, in which luminal cells are biased toward a more basal-like phenotype [8]. Luminal progenitor cells presumably depend, in part, on BRCA1 for providing high-fidelity DNA repair, as they are highly proliferative. Altered proliferative and differentiative properties, compounded by a predisposition to genomic instability, are likely to set the stage for neoplastic trans-formation. It seems likely that somatic gene silencing of BRCA1 through epigenetic mechanisms plays a similarly important role in sporadic basal-like breast cancer. Further elucidation of molecular perturbations resulting from BRCA1 deficiency will hopefully provide important clues on therapeutic targets relevant to breast cancer treatment and chemoprevention for high-risk women.

Abbreviations

BRCA1: breast cancer 1: early onset; ER: estrogen receptor; PR: progesterone receptor.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
  15 in total

1.  Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer relates to the basal-like phenotype.

Authors:  David Sarrió; Socorro María Rodriguez-Pinilla; David Hardisson; Amparo Cano; Gema Moreno-Bueno; José Palacios
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Brca1 regulates in vitro differentiation of mammary epithelial cells.

Authors:  Marion Kubista; Margit Rosner; Ernst Kubista; Gerhard Bernaschek; Markus Hengstschläger
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2002-07-18       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  BRCA1 regulates human mammary stem/progenitor cell fate.

Authors:  Suling Liu; Christophe Ginestier; Emmanuelle Charafe-Jauffret; Hailey Foco; Celina G Kleer; Sofia D Merajver; Gabriela Dontu; Max S Wicha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells.

Authors:  Sendurai A Mani; Wenjun Guo; Mai-Jing Liao; Elinor Ng Eaton; Ayyakkannu Ayyanan; Alicia Y Zhou; Mary Brooks; Ferenc Reinhard; Cheng Cheng Zhang; Michail Shipitsin; Lauren L Campbell; Kornelia Polyak; Cathrin Brisken; Jing Yang; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Aberrant luminal progenitors as the candidate target population for basal tumor development in BRCA1 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Elgene Lim; François Vaillant; Di Wu; Natasha C Forrest; Bhupinder Pal; Adam H Hart; Marie-Liesse Asselin-Labat; David E Gyorki; Teresa Ward; Audrey Partanen; Frank Feleppa; Lily I Huschtscha; Heather J Thorne; Stephen B Fox; Max Yan; Juliet D French; Melissa A Brown; Gordon K Smyth; Jane E Visvader; Geoffrey J Lindeman
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-08-02       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  The basal-like breast carcinoma phenotype is regulated by SLUG gene expression.

Authors:  G Storci; P Sansone; D Trere; S Tavolari; M Taffurelli; C Ceccarelli; T Guarnieri; P Paterini; M Pariali; L Montanaro; D Santini; P Chieco; M Bonafé
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.996

7.  A method for quantifying normal human mammary epithelial stem cells with in vivo regenerative ability.

Authors:  Peter Eirew; John Stingl; Afshin Raouf; Gulisa Turashvili; Samuel Aparicio; Joanne T Emerman; Connie J Eaves
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2008-11-23       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  Altered proliferation and differentiation properties of primary mammary epithelial cells from BRCA1 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Laura N Burga; Nadine M Tung; Susan L Troyan; Mihnea Bostina; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos; Helena Fountzilas; Dimitrios Spentzos; Alexander Miron; Yosuf A Yassin; Bernard T Lee; Gerburg M Wulf
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Mapping the cellular and molecular heterogeneity of normal and malignant breast tissues and cultured cell lines.

Authors:  Patrica J Keller; Amy F Lin; Lisa M Arendt; Ina Klebba; Ainsely D Jones; Jenny A Rudnick; Theresa A DiMeo; Hannah Gilmore; Douglas M Jefferson; Roger A Graham; Stephen P Naber; Stuart Schnitt; Charlotte Kuperwasser
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Evidence for a stem cell hierarchy in the adult human breast.

Authors:  René Villadsen; Agla J Fridriksdottir; Lone Rønnov-Jessen; Thorarinn Gudjonsson; Fritz Rank; Mark A LaBarge; Mina J Bissell; Ole W Petersen
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  9 in total

1.  Tissue-specific tumor suppression by BRCA1.

Authors:  Eva Y-H P Lee; Serena Abbondante
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The Breast Cancer Protooncogenes HER2, BRCA1 and BRCA2 and Their Regulation by the iNOS/NOS2 Axis.

Authors:  Katie Lin; Stavroula Baritaki; Silvia Vivarelli; Luca Falzone; Aurora Scalisi; Massimo Libra; Benjamin Bonavida
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17

3.  Pubertal bisphenol A exposure alters murine mammary stem cell function leading to early neoplasia in regenerated glands.

Authors:  Danhan Wang; Hui Gao; Abhik Bandyopadhyay; Anqi Wu; I-Tien Yeh; Yidong Chen; Yi Zou; Changjiang Huang; Christi A Walter; Qiaoxiang Dong; Lu-Zhe Sun
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2014-02-11

4.  The PPARγ agonist efatutazone increases the spectrum of well-differentiated mammary cancer subtypes initiated by loss of full-length BRCA1 in association with TP53 haploinsufficiency.

Authors:  Rebecca E Nakles; Bhaskar V S Kallakury; Priscilla A Furth
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Histone Demethylase KDM6A Controls the Mammary Luminal Lineage through Enzyme-Independent Mechanisms.

Authors:  Kyung Hyun Yoo; Sumin Oh; Keunsoo Kang; Chaochen Wang; Gertraud W Robinson; Kai Ge; Lothar Hennighausen
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 6.  The Context-Dependent Impact of Integrin-Associated CD151 and Other Tetraspanins on Cancer Development and Progression: A Class of Versatile Mediators of Cellular Function and Signaling, Tumorigenesis and Metastasis.

Authors:  Sonia Erfani; Hui Hua; Yueyin Pan; Binhua P Zhou; Xiuwei H Yang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Developmental changes in the in vitro activated regenerative activity of primitive mammary epithelial cells.

Authors:  Maisam Makarem; Nagarajan Kannan; Long V Nguyen; David J H F Knapp; Sneha Balani; Michael D Prater; John Stingl; Afshin Raouf; Oksana Nemirovsky; Peter Eirew; Connie J Eaves
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 8.  Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) and Regulation of EMT Factors by Steroid Nuclear Receptors in Breast Cancer: A Review and in Silico Investigation.

Authors:  Ioannis A Voutsadakis
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Brcal Defective Breast Cancer Cells Induce in vitro Transformation of Cancer Associated Fibroblasts (CAFs) to Metastasis Associated Fibroblasts (MAF).

Authors:  Sreelatha K Hemalatha; Satheesh Kumar Sengodan; Revathy Nadhan; Jithin Dev; Reshma R Sushama; Veena Somasundaram; Ratheeshkumar Thankappan; Arathi Rajan; Neetha Rajan Latha; Geetu Rose Varghese; Arun Peter Mathew; Thara Somanathan; Priya Srinivas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.