Literature DB >> 21489067

Appearance matters: the frame and focus of health messages influences beliefs about skin cancer.

Kevin Thomas1, David Hevey, Maria Pertl, Siobhán Ní Chuinneagáin, Agnella Craig, Laura Maher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to ascertain whether the health message 'framing effect', which has been observed for several diseases, occurs for messages concerning the consequences of skin cancer for one's appearance or one's health. Specifically, the effect of the frame and focus of health messages on intentions to perform skin protection behaviours and the perceived threat of skin cancer was investigated.
DESIGN: Consistent with previous research and to avoid carry-over effects, a two-factor, between-groups (message frame: gain vs. loss × message focus: appearance vs. health) design was used.
METHODS: Participants (N= 390) were recruited using convenience sampling and presented with one of four health messages, which were embedded in a questionnaire concerning beliefs about skin cancer (intentions to perform different skin protection behaviours, the perceived threat of skin cancer) and body consciousness. The health messages were framed in terms of loss (risks of sun exposure) or gain (benefits of skin protection) and focused on the consequences of sun exposure for one's appearance or one's health. The primary outcome measures were responses on rating scales concerning the perceived threat of skin cancer, intentions to perform different skin cancer protection behaviours, and body consciousness.
RESULTS: Perceived threat of skin cancer was found to be greater for appearance-focused messages and intentions to perform different skin protection behaviours were greater for loss-framed messages. These findings held when individual differences in body consciousness were controlled for.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that, for the communication of information about skin cancer to be effective, messages must focus on the impact of sun exposure and inadequate skin protection for people's appearance, not just their health. Moreover, to maximize effectiveness, health messages about skin cancer should take account of dispositional differences in the importance placed upon one's appearance. ©2010 The British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21489067     DOI: 10.1348/135910710X520088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Health Psychol        ISSN: 1359-107X


  11 in total

1.  Brazilian consensus on photoprotection.

Authors:  Sérgio Schalka; Denise Steiner; Flávia Naranjo Ravelli; Tatiana Steiner; Aripuanã Cobério Terena; Carolina Reato Marçon; Eloisa Leis Ayres; Flávia Alvim Sant'anna Addor; Helio Amante Miot; Humberto Ponzio; Ida Duarte; Jane Neffá; José Antônio Jabur da Cunha; Juliana Catucci Boza; Luciana de Paula Samorano; Marcelo de Paula Corrêa; Marcus Maia; Nilton Nasser; Olga Maria Rodrigues Ribeiro Leite; Otávio Sergio Lopes; Pedro Dantas Oliveira; Renata Leal Bregunci Meyer; Tânia Cestari; Vitor Manoel Silva dos Reis; Vitória Regina Pedreira de Almeida Rego
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.896

2.  Evaluation of Project Students are Sun Safe (SASS): A University Student-Delivered Skin Cancer Prevention Program for Schools.

Authors:  Raeann Davis; Lois J Loescher; Jillian Rogers; Denise Spartonos; Aimee Snyder; Stephanie Koch; Robin B Harris
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  The influence of framed messages and self-affirmation on indoor tanning behavioral intentions in 18- to 30-year-old women.

Authors:  Darren Mays; Xiaoquan Zhao
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  "Oh yeah, they're looking": A thematic analysis of indoor UV tanning industry advertising and articles.

Authors:  Suzanne M Prior; Lindsay P Rafuse
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 2.222

Review 5.  Gain-framed messages do not motivate sun protection: a meta-analytic review of randomized trials comparing gain-framed and loss-framed appeals for promoting skin cancer prevention.

Authors:  Daniel J O'Keefe; Daisy Wu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Design and Feasibility of a Text Messaging Intervention to Prevent Indoor Tanning Among Young Adult Women: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  William D Evans; Darren Mays
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.773

7.  Systematic Review of Commercially Available Mobile Phone Applications for Prostate Cancer Education.

Authors:  Otis L Owens; Jenay M Beer; Ligia I Reyes; Tracey L Thomas
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2018-12-07

8.  Perceived relevance of educative information on public (skin) health: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Daniela Haluza; Renate Cervinka
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2013-03-28

9.  Perceived Relevance of Educative Information on Public (Skin) Health: Results of a Representative, Population-Based Telephone Survey.

Authors:  Daniela Haluza; Markus Schwab; Stana Simic; Renate Cervinka; Hanns Moshammer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Systematic Review of Interventions to Increase Awareness of Ultraviolet Radiation-Induced Harm and Protective Behaviors in Post-Secondary School Adults.

Authors:  Yuka Asai; Dawn Armstrong; Meghan L McPhie; Chao Xue; Cheryl F Rosen
Journal:  J Cutan Med Surg       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.