Literature DB >> 21488958

Classification of climate-change-induced stresses on biological diversity.

Juliane Geyer1, Iris Kiefer, Stefan Kreft, Veronica Chavez, Nick Salafsky, Florian Jeltsch, Pierre L Ibisch.   

Abstract

Conservation actions need to account for and be adapted to address changes that will occur under global climate change. The identification of stresses on biological diversity (as defined in the Convention on Biological Diversity) is key in the process of adaptive conservation management. We considered any impact of climate change on biological diversity a stress because such an effect represents a change (negative or positive) in key ecological attributes of an ecosystem or parts of it. We applied a systemic approach and a hierarchical framework in a comprehensive classification of stresses to biological diversity that are caused directly by global climate change. Through analyses of 20 conservation sites in 7 countries and a review of the literature, we identified climate-change-induced stresses. We grouped the identified stresses according to 3 levels of biological diversity: stresses that affect individuals and populations, stresses that affect biological communities, and stresses that affect ecosystem structure and function. For each stress category, we differentiated 3 hierarchical levels of stress: stress class (thematic grouping with the coarsest resolution, 8); general stresses (thematic groups of specific stresses, 21); and specific stresses (most detailed definition of stresses, 90). We also compiled an overview of effects of climate change on ecosystem services using the categories of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment and 2 additional categories. Our classification may be used to identify key climate-change-related stresses to biological diversity and may assist in the development of appropriate conservation strategies. The classification is in list format, but it accounts for relations among climate-change-induced stresses.
© 2011 Society for Conservation Biology.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21488958     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01676.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  6 in total

1.  Response diversity of wild bees to overwintering temperatures.

Authors:  Jochen Fründ; Sarah L Zieger; Teja Tscharntke
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Identifying the world's most climate change vulnerable species: a systematic trait-based assessment of all birds, amphibians and corals.

Authors:  Wendy B Foden; Stuart H M Butchart; Simon N Stuart; Jean-Christophe Vié; H Resit Akçakaya; Ariadne Angulo; Lyndon M DeVantier; Alexander Gutsche; Emre Turak; Long Cao; Simon D Donner; Vineet Katariya; Rodolphe Bernard; Robert A Holland; Adrian F Hughes; Susannah E O'Hanlon; Stephen T Garnett; Cagan H Sekercioğlu; Georgina M Mace
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Conceptualizing ecosystem tipping points within a physiological framework.

Authors:  Christopher D G Harley; Sean D Connell; Zoë A Doubleday; Brendan Kelaher; Bayden D Russell; Gianluca Sarà; Brian Helmuth
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Habitat assessment of Marco Polo sheep (Ovis ammon polii) in Eastern Tajikistan: Modeling the effects of climate change.

Authors:  Eric Ariel L Salas; Raul Valdez; Stefan Michel; Kenneth G Boykin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Changes in breeding phenology of eastern Ontario frogs over four decades.

Authors:  Samantha P Klaus; Stephen C Lougheed
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  A review of factors influencing the stress response in Australian marsupials.

Authors:  Stephanie Hing; Edward Narayan; R C Andrew Thompson; Stephanie Godfrey
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.079

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.