Literature DB >> 21488955

Incentive structure of and private landowner participation in an endangered species conservation program.

Michael G Sorice1, Wolfgang Haider, J Richard Conner, Robert B Ditton.   

Abstract

In the United States, voluntary incentive programs that aid conservation of plant and wildlife species on private lands provide a structural solution to the problem of protecting endangered species by reducing costs and enhancing benefits to landowners. We explored the potential for incentives to encourage landowners to manage land cover for the benefit of endangered songbirds in central Texas (U.S.A.) by asking landowners to indicate their preferences for financial incentives, technical assistance, and regulatory assurances. We identified owners of potential songbird habitat and collected data in face-to-face interviews and self-administered questionnaires. We used a latent-class stated-choice model to identify 3 classes of landowners whose choices varied on the basis of their attitudes and perceived social norms: (1) strong positive attitude, perceived social pressure to participate, and willing to participate with relatively few incentives, (2) weak positive attitude, perceived no social pressure to participate, and required strongest incentives, and (3) negative attitude, perceived social pressure not to enroll, and unwilling to participate regardless of incentive structure. Given this heterogeneity in preferences, conservation incentives may increase management of land cover to benefit endangered species on private lands to some degree; however, exclusive reliance on incentives may be insufficient. Promoting conservation on private lands may be enhanced by integrating incentives into an approach that incorporates other strategies for conservation, including social networks and collaborative processes that reinforce social norms. ©2011 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21488955     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01673.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  6 in total

1.  Bioeconomic analysis supports the endangered species act.

Authors:  Kehinde R Salau; Eli P Fenichel
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Young Forest Conservation Incentive Programs: Explaining Re-Enrollment and Post-program Persistence.

Authors:  Seth H Lutter; Ashley A Dayer; Jeffery L Larkin
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-12-09       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Opening the black box between governance and management: A mechanism-based explanation of how governance affects the management of endangered species.

Authors:  Raphael Anammasiya Ayambire; Jeremy Pittman
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 6.943

4.  A human-centered framework for innovation in conservation incentive programs.

Authors:  Michael G Sorice; C Josh Donlan
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  Scaling participation in payments for ecosystem services programs.

Authors:  Michael G Sorice; C Josh Donlan; Kevin J Boyle; Weibin Xu; Stefan Gelcich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Bovine Tuberculosis Management in Northwest Minnesota and Implications of the Risk Information Seeking and Processing (RISP) Model for Wildlife Disease Management.

Authors:  Megan Cross; Alex Heeren; Louis J Cornicelli; David C Fulton
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-08-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.