OBJECTIVE: We show how continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data can be analyzed using a three-level B-spline model, facilitating the estimation of inter-patient variability, within-patient inter-day variability, and measurement error. We propose methods for statistical comparison of glucose profiles among patient groups. METHODS: We applied a three-level random effects model using quadratic B-spline functions to analyze inter-patient and within-patient inter-day variations of the glucose trend. The estimated SD values of the glucose curves are time-dependent and were averaged over a 24-h period. We analyzed CGM data from 322 patients with type 1 diabetes, 223 patients with type 2 diabetes, and 86 subjects without diabetes using interstitial glucose levels measured every 5 min, for approximately 8 days per patient. We compared group-wide glucose profiles from the insulin pump-treated (n = 124) and multiple daily injection (MDI)-treated (n = 144) patients with type 1 diabetes. RESULTS: The average inter-patient SD values were 49 mg/dL, 43 mg/dL, and 15 mg/dL for type 1 diabetes patients, type 2 diabetes patients, and subjects without diabetes, respectively. The average within-patient, inter-day SD values were 67 mg/dL, 41 mg/dL, and 18 mg/dL, respectively. The residual SD values were 19 mg/dL, 14 mg/dL, and 8 mg/dL, respectively. We identified a statistically significant difference in glucose profiles during the morning between insulin pump-treated and MDI-treated type 1 diabetes patients. CONCLUSIONS: B-spline models facilitate the analysis of CGM data and show that type 1 diabetes is associated with higher inter-day glucose variation than type 2 diabetes or being without diabetes. Pump therapy and MDI have different effects on glucose control during specific time periods.
OBJECTIVE: We show how continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data can be analyzed using a three-level B-spline model, facilitating the estimation of inter-patient variability, within-patient inter-day variability, and measurement error. We propose methods for statistical comparison of glucose profiles among patient groups. METHODS: We applied a three-level random effects model using quadratic B-spline functions to analyze inter-patient and within-patient inter-day variations of the glucose trend. The estimated SD values of the glucose curves are time-dependent and were averaged over a 24-h period. We analyzed CGM data from 322 patients with type 1 diabetes, 223 patients with type 2 diabetes, and 86 subjects without diabetes using interstitial glucose levels measured every 5 min, for approximately 8 days per patient. We compared group-wide glucose profiles from the insulin pump-treated (n = 124) and multiple daily injection (MDI)-treated (n = 144) patients with type 1 diabetes. RESULTS: The average inter-patient SD values were 49 mg/dL, 43 mg/dL, and 15 mg/dL for type 1 diabetespatients, type 2 diabetespatients, and subjects without diabetes, respectively. The average within-patient, inter-day SD values were 67 mg/dL, 41 mg/dL, and 18 mg/dL, respectively. The residual SD values were 19 mg/dL, 14 mg/dL, and 8 mg/dL, respectively. We identified a statistically significant difference in glucose profiles during the morning between insulin pump-treated and MDI-treated type 1 diabetespatients. CONCLUSIONS: B-spline models facilitate the analysis of CGM data and show that type 1 diabetes is associated with higher inter-day glucose variation than type 2 diabetes or being without diabetes. Pump therapy and MDI have different effects on glucose control during specific time periods.
Authors: Roger S Mazze; Ellie Strock; Sarah Borgman; David Wesley; Philip Stout; Joel Racchini Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: William V Tamborlane; Roy W Beck; Bruce W Bode; Bruce Buckingham; H Peter Chase; Robert Clemons; Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer; Larry A Fox; Lisa K Gilliam; Irl B Hirsch; Elbert S Huang; Craig Kollman; Aaron J Kowalski; Lori Laffel; Jean M Lawrence; Joyce Lee; Nelly Mauras; Michael O'Grady; Katrina J Ruedy; Michael Tansey; Eva Tsalikian; Stuart Weinzimer; Darrell M Wilson; Howard Wolpert; Tim Wysocki; Dongyuan Xing Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-09-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David M Nathan; Judith Kuenen; Rikke Borg; Hui Zheng; David Schoenfeld; Robert J Heine Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-06-07 Impact factor: 19.112