Literature DB >> 21487930

Using partial area for evaluation of bioavailability and bioequivalence.

Mei-Ling Chen1, Barbara Davit, Robert Lionberger, Zakaria Wahba, Hae-Young Ahn, Lawrence X Yu.   

Abstract

Assessment of bioavailability/bioequivalence generally relies on the comparison of rate and extent of drug absorption between products. Rate of absorption is commonly expressed by peak concentration (C(max)) and time to peak concentration (T(max)), although these parameters are indirect measures of absorption rate. Recognizing the importance of systemic exposure to drug efficacy and safety, FDA recommended that systemic exposure be better used for bioavailability/bioequivalence assessment. Apart from peak exposure and total exposure, FDA also recommended a new metric for early exposure that is considered necessary when a control of input rate is critical to ascertain drug efficacy and/or safety profile. The early exposure can be measured by truncating the area under the curve at T(max) of the reference product (PAUC(r,tmax)) or some designated early time after dosing. The choice of truncation is most appropriately based on PK/PD relationship or efficacy/safety data for the drug under examination. Compared with C(max), PAUC(r,tmax) has higher sensitivity in detecting formulation differences and may be more variable. If the metric is highly variable, the reference-scaling approach can be employed for bioequivalence evaluation. The partial area metric is useful in PK/PD characterization as well as in the evaluation of bioavailability, bioequivalence and/or comparability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21487930     DOI: 10.1007/s11095-011-0421-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  18 in total

1.  An alternative approach for assessment of rate of absorption in bioequivalence studies.

Authors:  M L Chen
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Challenges and opportunities in establishing scientific and regulatory standards for assuring therapeutic equivalence of modified release products: workshop summary report.

Authors:  Mei-Ling Chen; Vinod P Shah; Derek Ganes; Kamal K Midha; James Caro; Prabu Nambiar; Mario L Rocci; Avinash G Thombre; Bertil Abrahamsson; Dale Conner; Barbara Davit; Paul Fackler; Colm Farrell; Suneel Gupta; Russell Katz; Mehul Mehta; Sheldon H Preskorn; Gerard Sanderink; Salomon Stavchansky; Robert Temple; Yaning Wang; Helen Winkle; Lawrence Yu
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 3.  Bioequivalence approaches for highly variable drugs and drug products.

Authors:  Sam H Haidar; Barbara Davit; Mei-Ling Chen; Dale Conner; LaiMing Lee; Qian H Li; Robert Lionberger; Fairouz Makhlouf; Devvrat Patel; Donald J Schuirmann; Lawrence X Yu
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Evaluation of a scaling approach for the bioequivalence of highly variable drugs.

Authors:  Sam H Haidar; Fairouz Makhlouf; Donald J Schuirmann; Terry Hyslop; Barbara Davit; Dale Conner; Lawrence X Yu
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Efficacy and safety of zolpidem-MR: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in adults with primary insomnia.

Authors:  Thomas Roth; Christina Soubrane; Laurence Titeux; James K Walsh
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 3.492

6.  Absorption rate vs. exposure: which is more useful for bioequivalence testing?

Authors:  T N Tozer; F Y Bois; W W Hauck; M L Chen; R L Williams
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Secondary metrics for the assessment of bioequivalence.

Authors:  L Endrenyi; L Tothfalusi
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.534

8.  Evaluation of different metrics as indirect measures of rate of drug absorption from extended release dosage forms at steady-state.

Authors:  C Reppas; L F Lacey; O N Keene; P Macheras; A Bye
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  The cutoff time point of the partial area method for assessment of rate of absorption in bioequivalence studies.

Authors:  P Macheras; M Symillides; C Reppas
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  Bioequivalence: performance of several measures of rate of absorption.

Authors:  F Y Bois; T N Tozer; W W Hauck; M L Chen; R Patnaik; R L Williams
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.200

View more
  6 in total

1.  Use of partial area under the curve metrics to assess bioequivalence of methylphenidate multiphasic modified release formulations.

Authors:  Ethan M Stier; Barbara M Davit; Parthapratim Chandaroy; Mei-Ling Chen; Jeanne Fourie-Zirkelbach; Andre Jackson; Stephanie Kim; Robert Lionberger; Mehul Mehta; Ramana S Uppoor; Yaning Wang; Lawrence Yu; Dale P Conner
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  Metrics for the evaluation of bioequivalence of modified-release formulations.

Authors:  Laszlo Endrenyi; Laszlo Tothfalusi
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Proposing the Use of Partial AUC as an Adjunctive Measure in Establishing Bioequivalence Between Deltoid and Gluteal Administration of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics.

Authors:  Lik Hang N Lee; Charles Choi; Pavel Gershkovich; Alasdair M Barr; William G Honer; Ric M Procyshyn
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.441

4.  The clinical impact of switching attention deficit hyperactivity disorder patients from OROS(®)-MPH to Novo-MPH ER-C(®): A paediatric practice review.

Authors:  Judy Pm van Stralen
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.253

5.  Use of partial AUC (PAUC) to evaluate bioequivalence--a case study with complex absorption: methylphenidate.

Authors:  Jeanne Fourie Zirkelbach; Andre J Jackson; Yaning Wang; Donald J Schuirmann
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Assessment of In Vitro Bioaccessibility and In Vivo Oral Bioavailability as Complementary Tools to Better Understand the Effect of Cooking on Methylmercury, Arsenic, and Selenium in Tuna.

Authors:  Tania Charette; Danyel Bueno Dalto; Maikel Rosabal; J Jacques Matte; Marc Amyot
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-02-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.