Literature DB >> 21487927

A model of top-down gain control in the auditory system.

Bruce A Schneider1, Scott Parker, Dana Murphy.   

Abstract

To evaluate a model of top-down gain control in the auditory system, 6 participants were asked to identify 1-kHz pure tones differing only in intensity. There were three 20-session conditions: (1) four soft tones (25, 30, 35, and 40 dB SPL) in the set; (2) those four soft tones plus a 50-dB SPL tone; and (3) the four soft tones plus an 80-dB SPL tone. The results were well described by a top-down, nonlinear gain-control system in which the amplifier's gain depended on the highest intensity in the stimulus set. Individual participants' identification judgments were generally compatible with an equal-variance signal-detection model in which the mean locations of the distribution of effects along the decision axis were determined by the operation of this nonlinear amplification system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21487927      PMCID: PMC3118000          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0097-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  13 in total

1.  The intensity-difference limen for Gaussian-enveloped stimuli as a function of level: tones and broadband noise.

Authors:  L Nizami; J F Reimer; W Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Top-down gain control in the auditory system: evidence from identification and discrimination experiments.

Authors:  Scott Parker; Dana R Murphy; Bruce A Schneider
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-05

3.  Does stimulus context affect loudness or only loudness judgments?

Authors:  B Schneider; S Parker
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-11

4.  Tracking the time to recovery after induced loudness reduction.

Authors:  Yoav Arieh; Karen Kelly; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Gain control in the auditory system: absolute identification of intensity within and across the two ears.

Authors:  Michael S Gordon; Bruce Schneider
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-02

6.  The effect of stimulus range on perceived contrast: evidence for contrast gain control.

Authors:  B Schneider; S Parker; G Moraglia
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1996-12

7.  Criterial range as a frame of reference for stimulus judgment.

Authors:  F Gravetter; G R Lockhead
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Shifts of attention in the identification and discrimination of intensity.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-02

9.  Response bias in category and magnitude estimation of difference and similarity for loudness and pitch.

Authors:  B Schneider; S Parker; M Valenti; G Farrell; G Kanow
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Two tests of a neural attention hypothesis for auditory psychophysics.

Authors:  R D Luce; D M Green
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-05
View more
  3 in total

1.  In pursuit of taste phenotypes.

Authors:  Barry G Green
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Predominant Qualities Evoked by Quinine, Sucrose, and Capsaicin Associate With PROP Bitterness, but not TAS2R38 Genotype.

Authors:  Alissa A Nolden; John E McGeary; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  A striking reduction of simple loudness adaptation in autism.

Authors:  Rebecca P Lawson; Jessica Aylward; Sarah White; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.